• Chinese Core Periodicals
  • Chinese Core Journals of Science and Technology
  • RCCSE Chinese Authoritative Academic Journals
QIU Fengqi, ZHU Lei, GU Wenzhe, LIU Zhicheng, ZHANG Xinfu, PAN Hao, SONG Tianqi. Mining Pressure Law and Working Resistance of Support in Face with Large Mining Height in Shallow Seam[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(11): 243-247.
Citation: QIU Fengqi, ZHU Lei, GU Wenzhe, LIU Zhicheng, ZHANG Xinfu, PAN Hao, SONG Tianqi. Mining Pressure Law and Working Resistance of Support in Face with Large Mining Height in Shallow Seam[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(11): 243-247.

Mining Pressure Law and Working Resistance of Support in Face with Large Mining Height in Shallow Seam

More Information
  • Published Date: November 19, 2020
  • In order to study the law of ground pressure appearance in the face with large mining height in shallow coal seam and determine its reasonable working resistance of support, the 5-2 coal 503 working face of Daliuta Coal Mine in Shendong is selected as the research object. The law of ground pressure appearance in the face with large mining height in shallow coal seam is studied through the thin plate theory and the field measured ground pressure data, and the support resistance is calculated by combining two different theoretical calculation formulas force analysis. The results show that the initial step distance of 52503 working face is 64.4 m, which is basically consistent with 61.7 m calculated based on thin plate theory; the periodic weighting step fluctuates between 7.65 m and 29.75 m during the normal mining period, with an average of 19.16 m, a dynamic load coefficient of 1.45-1.57, an average of 1.50, which shows a strong mine pressure; during the weighting period, the support resistance along the inclined direction of the working face presents a “convex” type among them, the lower support resistance of the working face is about 69.8% of the middle part, and the upper support resistance of the working face is about 66.5% of the middle part; the working resistance calculated based on the two support strength theories is 17 871 kN and 19 890 kN respectively, which is smaller than the ZY21000/36.5/70D hydraulic support with the rated working resistance of 21 000 kN, which can meet the support requirements of the roof pressure above the working face.
  • [1]
    王云广,郭文兵,白二虎,等.高强度开采覆岩运移特征与机理研究[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(S1):28-35.
    [2]
    王淑燕.神东矿区资源开发利用研究与探索[J].煤矿安全,2017,48(S1):104-108.
    [3]
    张建华.薄基岩浅埋煤层安全开采技术研究[D].太原:太原理工大学,2011.
    [4]
    赵勋益,雷文成,万志军.中厚煤层高产高效开采上覆岩层的破断规律[J].矿山压力与顶板管理,2003(4):78-80.
    [5]
    郭佐宁,黄永安,崔峰,等.两硬浅埋条件下6.0m采高工作面顶板运移规律数值分析[J].西安科技大学学报,2011,31(1):1-5.
    [6]
    张子飞,杨俊哲,代贵生,等.7 m大采高综采工作面开采关键技术研究[J].煤炭工程,2015,47(3):1.
    [7]
    刘洋,吴桂义,孔德中,等.大采高工作面支架阻力确定及顶板运移规律的采厚效应分析[J].煤矿安全,2018,49(2):202-205.
    [8]
    梅星,孔德中,刘新杰,等.深埋薄基岩大采高工作面矿压规律研究[J].煤矿安全,2014,45(4):21.
    [9]
    许家林,朱卫兵,鞠金峰.浅埋煤层开采压架类型[J].煤炭学报,2014,39(8):1625-1634.
    [10]
    管杰,李彦斌,李立功,等.大采高一次采全高工作面片帮机理及控制方案[J].煤矿安全,2015,46(9):232-235.
    [11]
    杨俊哲.7.0 m大采高工作面覆岩破断及矿压显现规律研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2017(8):1-7.
    [12]
    柴敬,高登彦,王国旺,等.厚基岩浅埋大采高加长工作面矿压规律研究[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2009, 26(4):437-440.
    [13]
    鞠金峰,许家林,王庆雄.大采高采场关键层“悬臂梁”结构运动型式及对矿压的影响[J].煤炭学报,2011,36(12):2115-2120.
    [14]
    于斌,朱卫兵,李竹,等.特厚煤层开采远场覆岩结构失稳机理[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(9):2398-2407.
    [15]
    鞠金峰,许家林,朱卫兵,等.大柳塔煤矿22103综采面压架机理及防治技术[J].煤炭科学技术,2012,40(2):4-7.
    [16]
    高登彦,杨金楼.大柳塔煤矿52煤7 m大采高综采工作面支架工作阻力分析[J].中国矿业,2016,25(2):80-84.
    [17]
    余学义,穆驰,毛旭魏,等.大采高综采工作面支架合理工作阻力研究[J].煤矿安全,2017,48(6):196.
    [18]
    于辉.基于薄板理论的首采工作面基本顶来压步距数值研究[J].科学技术与工程,2018,18(21):195.
    [19]
    吴成峰.液压支架工作阻力确定方法[J].煤矿机械,2015,36(10):64-66.
    [20]
    钱鸣高,石平五,许家林.矿山压力与岩层控制[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2010.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Bei, YANG Yuanzhong. Study on Caving Property of Top Coal in Fully Mechanized Caving Face with Double Inclined and Large Dip Angle[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(9): 211-216,221.
    [2]MA Duanzhi. Structural Charaeteristics and Adaptability of Four-leg Caving Top Coal Hydraulic Supports[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(2): 137-139.
    [3]YUN Dongfeng, LIU Zhu, CHENG Wendong, FAN Zhendong, SU Puzheng, WANG Dongfang, ZHANG Yuanhao. Monitoring Analysis of Side Guard Plate Load of Fully Mechanized Caving Support in Large Dip Angle Thick Coal Seam[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(10): 216-219.
    [4]CUI Jingkun, LI Haijiang, LI Xuning, LI Zhenyu, LI Mo, GU Kelei. Experiment of Processing Parameters for Loose Top-coal Under Caving Mining Technique[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(4): 60-62,67.
    [5]LI Jianfeng, REN Wanxing, GUO Qing, FANG Shuqi, WANG Zhenfeng. Application of Superhigh-water Material in Fire Preventing and Extinguishing of Large Dip Angle Fully-mechanized Working Face[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(10): 143-145,149.
    [6]WU Linping. Analysis of Support Stability for Fully Mechanized Caving Face in Steep Thick Coal Seam[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(6): 224-227,230.
    [7]SONG Zhengyang, WANG Wei, ZHANG Jinwang, GUO Yao. Dynamic Bearing Characters and Numerical Analysis for Top Coal Caving Hydraulic Supports in Mindong No.1 Mine[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(4): 199-202.
    [8]KONG Dezhong, PAN Weidong, LI Delin, SONG Wenbo. Cavability Analysis of Top-coal at Close Coal Seams Full Mechanized Caving Face with Large Height[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(9): 216-218,225.
    [9]ZHANG Hai-feng. Application of Top Coal Caving Technology in Yangwangou Coal Mine[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(5): 157-159.
    [10]ZHAO Guang-rong. Fully Mechanized Coal Caving Mining Technology in Soft and Thick Coal Seams with Large Inclination[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(6): 41-43,44.

Catalog

    Article views (21) PDF downloads (0) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return