• Chinese Core Periodicals
  • Chinese Core Journals of Science and Technology
  • RCCSE Chinese Authoritative Academic Journals
JIA Aifang, TIAN Shuicheng, GUO Xinyue, TANG Kai. An experimental study on risk decision of miners based on dual IGT task[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2021, 52(9): 256-260.
Citation: JIA Aifang, TIAN Shuicheng, GUO Xinyue, TANG Kai. An experimental study on risk decision of miners based on dual IGT task[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2021, 52(9): 256-260.

An experimental study on risk decision of miners based on dual IGT task

More Information
  • Published Date: September 19, 2021
  • In order to study the risk decision-making tendency of miners, control the occurrence of human accidents, reduce the incidence of coal mine accidents, and ensure the safety of life and property in the coal mine, the dual Iowa Game Task(IGT) experiment combined with questionnaire was adopted to invite miners from a coal mine in Gaoping as participants for empirical research. The data obtained in the study were analyzed and processed by software such as SPSS 25.0, GraphPad Prism 5.0 and Excel 19.0. The results showed that the participants’ risk tendency was not obvious in the “highlight reward” test, while in the “highlight punishment” test, participants’ risk tendency was more risky in the condition of high penalty, and more conservative in the condition of low penalty. Mixed measure analysis of variance(ANOV) on the net scores of the five modules in the experiment showed that participants tended to make more conservative risk decisions under the “highlight penalty” condition, while participants tended to make more risky risk decisions under the “highlight reward” condition. In the “highlight reward” condition, net score was significantly correlated with risk preference and positive emotional margin, while in the “highlight punishment” condition, net score was significantly correlated with trait self-control, but had no correlation or weak correlation with other variables.
  • [1]
    Bechara A, Damasio AR, DamasioH, et a1. Insensitivity to futureconsequences following damage to human prefrontal codex[J]. Cognition, 1994, 50(1): 7-l5.
    [2]
    王欣.不同领导力水平大学生风险决策能力研究[D].开封:河南大学,2019.
    [3]
    王玉洁.冲动性对风险决策影响的实验研究[D].广州:广州大学,2013.
    [4]
    Jorie L Casey, Anita Cservenka. Effects of frequent marijuana use on risky decision-making in young adult college students[J]. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 2020(10)253.
    [5]
    许盼盼.奖励敏感性和冒险行为对青少年决策的影响—来自爱荷华博弈任务的证据[D].南昌:江西师范大学,2020.
    [6]
    刘笑笑,辛涛,林喆,等.初中生风险决策表现的认知建模分析:自尊及性别的影响[J].心理学探新,2018,38(4):319 -325.

    LIU Xiaoxiao, XIN Tao, LIN Zhe, et al. Risky decision making of adolescents in junior high school with cognitive modeling analysis: the roles of self-esteem and gender[J]. Psychological Exploration, 2018, 38(4): 319-325.
    [7]
    Jennifer L Temple, Amanda M Ziegler, Adam M Graczyk,et al. Effects of acute and chronic caffeine on risk-taking behavior in children and adolescents[J]. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 2017, 31(5): 561-568.
    [8]
    田菊.老年人在模糊决策上风险倾向研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2013.
    [9]
    Tangney J P, Baumeister R F, Boone A L. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success[J]. Journal of Personality, 2004, 72(2): 271-322.
    [10]
    谭树华,郭永玉.大学生自我控制量表的修订[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2008,16(5):468-470.

    TANG Shuhua, GUO Yongyu. Revision of self-control scale for Chinese college students[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2008, 16(5): 468-470.
    [11]
    李红霞,范永斌,韩晓静,等.煤矿工人风险偏好水平量表的设计与开发[J].安全与环境学报,2016,16(3):177 -181.

    LI Hongxia, FANG Yongbin, HAN Xiaojing, et al. On the development and establishment of the measuring questionnaire of coal miners’risk preference level scale[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2016, 16(3): 177-181.
    [12]
    Watson D, ClarkL A, Tellegen A. Development and validatio no fbrief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54(6): 1063—1070.
  • Related Articles

    [1]CHEN Tiehua. Concept definition and scale development of miners’ safety commitment[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(8): 258-264.
    [2]TIAN Shuicheng, ZHAO Zhaoying, FAN Binbin, CAI Xinfu, SUN Wen, GAO Ling. Research on fatigue and unsafe behavior of miners based on SEM[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2022, 53(6): 247-251.
    [3]YANG Xue, YANG Juan, ZHANG Hanyuan. Study on emotional evolution mechanism of miners based on system dynamics[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2021, 52(1): 252-256.
    [4]QI Hui, ZHANG Mingyang, CHEN Hong. Mechanism of Group Norms on Miners’ Violation Behaviors[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(9): 293-296.
    [5]YANG Xue, TIAN Yang, TONG Fengming. Research on Miners’ Emotional Supervision and Unsafe Behavior Based on Evolutionary Game[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(8): 299-302.
    [6]LI Hongxia, LI Siqi. Research on Relationship Between Safety Cognition and Unsafe Behavior of Coal Miners[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(11): 233-236.
    [7]GAI Lili. Research on Miners' Unsafe Behavior Based on Dynamic Game Theory[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(9): 251-253.
    [8]TIAN Shuicheng, KOU Meng, XUE Jianwen. Test Measurement on Miners' Capacity of Safety Behaviors[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(12): 245-248.
    [9]MAN Shen-gang. Analysis and Control Countermeasures of Miner Unsafe Behaviors[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(12): 217-220.
    [10]TIAN Shui-cheng, ZHAO Xue-ping, HUANG Xin, LI Ting-jun, LI Guang-li. Research on Miner Unsafe Behavior Intervention Based on Evolutionary Game Theory[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(8): 231-234.

Catalog

    Article views (18) PDF downloads (5) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return