• Chinese Core Periodicals
  • Chinese Core Journals of Science and Technology
  • RCCSE Chinese Authoritative Academic Journals
GUAN Qingsheng, YANG Bo, WANG Dechao, LI Weiteng, MEI Yuchun, YANG Ning, MA Haiyao. Study on Fine Numerical Simulation of Arch-locking Bolt in Soft Rock Roadway[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(2): 51-57,69.
Citation: GUAN Qingsheng, YANG Bo, WANG Dechao, LI Weiteng, MEI Yuchun, YANG Ning, MA Haiyao. Study on Fine Numerical Simulation of Arch-locking Bolt in Soft Rock Roadway[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(2): 51-57,69.

Study on Fine Numerical Simulation of Arch-locking Bolt in Soft Rock Roadway

More Information
  • Published Date: February 19, 2020
  • Locking bolts are frequently used to control the failure of the supporting arch in soft rock roadway support system, but the design basis of the locking bolts parameters is not clear. In order to investigate the roadway support effect influenced by the position and length of the arch-locking bolt, based on a typical soft rock roadway engineering case, numerical simulation experiments were carried out through an improved numerical simulation approach. The results indicate that: roadway supported without locking bolts deformed seriously, and the arch legs’ inward bending deformation and arch-rock separation were the breakthrough of the overall failure of the support system; the arch-locking bolts suppressed the arch legs inward bending deformation and prevented arch-rock separation, which ensured the integrity of the support system, and the final supporting effect was improved significantly; the deformation value and plastic zone volume both first decrease and then increase with the increasing of the locking bolt height H, and the impact was significant; the support effect tends to be better but not obvious with the increasing the arch-locking bolt length L. Based on the research conclusions, the optimized parameters of the lock arch bolt (H=1.0 m, L=3.0 m) were determined, and the field practice showed the optimization scheme works well.
  • [1]
    康红普,范明建,高富强,等.超千米深井巷道围岩变形特征与支护技术[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015, 34(11):2227-2241.
    [2]
    蓝航,陈东科,毛德兵.我国煤矿深部开采现状及灾害防治分析[J].煤炭科学技术,2016,44(1):39-46.
    [3]
    高延法,王波,王军,等.深井软岩巷道钢管混凝土支护结构性能试验及应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2010,29(S1):2604-2609.
    [4]
    李为腾,王乾,杨宁,等.钢管混凝土拱架在巷道支护中的发展与现状[J].土木工程学报,2016,49(11): 97-114.
    [5]
    谢文兵,荆升国,王涛,等.U型钢支架结构稳定性及其控制技术[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(S2):3743-3748.
    [6]
    王其洲,谢文兵,荆升国,等.动压影响巷道U型钢支架-锚索协同支护机理及其承载规律[J].煤炭学报,2015,40(2):301-307.
    [7]
    荆升国,王其洲,陈杰.深部“三软”煤巷棚-索强化控制机理研究[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2014,31(6):938-944.
    [8]
    荆升国.高应力破碎软岩巷道棚—索协同支护围岩控制机理研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2009.
    [9]
    罗彦斌,陈建勋.软弱围岩隧道锁脚锚杆受力特性及其力学计算模型[J].岩土工程学报,2013,35(8):1519-1525.
    [10]
    陈丽俊,张运良,马震岳,等.软岩隧洞锁脚锚杆–钢拱架联合承载分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(1):129-138.
    [11]
    李为腾,李术才,玄超,等.高应力软岩巷道支护失效机制及控制研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(9):1837-1847.
    [12]
    Li Wei-teng, Yang Ning, Li Ting-chun, et al. A new approach to simulate the supporting arch in a tunnel based on improvement of the beam element in FLAC3D[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A(Applied Physics & Engineering), 2017, 18(3): 179.
    [13]
    李为腾,杨宁,李廷春,等.FLAC3D中锚杆破断失效的实现及应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(4):753-767.
    [14]
    杨宁,李为腾,玄超,等.FLAC3D可破断锚杆单元完善及深部煤巷应用[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2017,34(2):251-258.
    [15]
    Li Weiteng, Yang Ning, Yang Bo, et al. An improved numerical simulation approach for arch-bolt supported tunnels with large deformation[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 77:1-12.
  • Related Articles

    [1]BAI Jieqi, BAI Jicheng, LIANG Yuntao, WANG Lin, SONG Shuanglin, TIAN Fuchao. Study on suppression of CH4 explosion by CF3H and CO2[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2024, 55(5): 122-130. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.20240180
    [2]SI Xiaokun. Properties of CO2 adsorption and migration during carbon sequestration in confined spaces[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2024, 55(4): 26-32. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.20230502
    [3]ZHENG Xuezhao, WU Shuo, WEN Hu, ZHANG Duo, WANG Baoyuan, YAN Xing. Study on CO2 adsorption and diffusion law of coal under different temperatures and pressures[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(9): 60-65. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2023.09.009
    [4]LI Dong, DAI Shijie, ZHENG Hongwei, CUI Ziyao. Study on maximum explosion pressure and maximum pressure rise rate of premixed gas explosion in flameproof enclosure[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(4): 216-221.
    [5]CUI Junfei. Influence of unloading confining pressure rate and gas pressure on mechanics and seepage properties of raw coal[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(4): 36-42.
    [6]JING Guoxun, PENG Le, BAN Tao. Influence of Coal Quality Index on Maximum Pressure Rise Rate in Coal Dust Explosion[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(1): 42-46.
    [7]XU Youlin, WU Xukun. Experimental Study on Influence of Gas Pressure on Adsorption Characteristics and Structure of Coal[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(8): 1-4,9.
    [8]LIU Kaihua. Shell Explosion Test for Flameproof Electrical Apparatus with Two Connected Chambers[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(10): 8-10,14.
    [9]DENG Jun, MA Xiaofeng, SHANG Tielin, ZHAO Yong. Numerical Simulation of Peak Pressure for Multiple Combustible Gase[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(4): 13-16,20.
    [10]NI Shuo-shuo, ZHANG Jing-song. Research on the Effect of Plunger Diameter Ratio on Peak Pressure of High Pressure Pulse Water Hammer Device[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(5): 76-79.

Catalog

    Article views (94) PDF downloads (0) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return