- Chinese Core Periodicals
- Chinese Core Journals of Science and Technology
- RCCSE Chinese Authoritative Academic Journals
| Citation: |
LI Nana, LIU Huihu, SANG Shuxun. Comparative study on pore size distribution in coal based on mercury intrusion-low temperature liquid nitrogen combined pore and nuclear magnetic resonance analysis[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2024, 55（2）: 1−9. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.20230344
|
The pore structure measurement in coal is commonly analyzed by mercury intrusion method, low temperature liquid nitrogen method and nuclear magnetic resonance method. Due to the different test methods, the results cannot be used uniformly, and the matrix compression effect in mercury intrusion method will cause large errors. In order to solve this problem, three high-rank coal samples from Jincheng and Changzhi Mining Areas in Qinshui Basin were taken as examples, and used mercury injection, low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption and nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation methods to test the pore structure of coal samples respectively. Through the compressibility correction of mercury injection data and splicing with low-temperature liquid nitrogen data at the connection aperture, the pore structure of coal was characterized by joint characterization, and the pore size distribution characteristics of coal were compared and analyzed in combination with nuclear magnetic resonance. The results show that the pore volume corrected by mercury intrusion data is closer to that of low temperature liquid nitrogen, and the deviation value is 22.40%-38.51%; the pore structure of different coal samples is analyzed by the joint pore method, and the position of the joint pore is between 75-89 nm; the results show that the pore volume of coal samples is 0.001 36-0.004 58 cm3/g, and the pore volume ratio of different pore sizes is transition pore>macropore>mesopore>micropore; compared with the single test method, the pore size distribution of the combined pore method and the nuclear magnetic resonance method is closer, but there are also differences. The average distribution ratios of micropores, transition pores, mesopores and macropores characterized by the combined pore method are 8.68%, 45.58%, 20.54% and 25.20%, respectively. The average distribution ratios of micropores, transition pores, mesopores and macropores characterized by the nuclear magnetic resonance method are 10.64%, 64.21%, 14.23% and 10.92%, respectively. The reason for the difference may be mainly related to the pore structure of coal changed by mercury intrusion method and low temperature liquid nitrogen method; through the comparison of NMR results, it is found that the combined corrected mercury injection and low temperature liquid nitrogen data can improve the accuracy of the pore size distribution test results in coal.
| [1] |
周德华,陈刚,陈贞龙,等. 中国深层煤层气勘探开发进展、关键评价参数与前景展望[J]. 天然气工业,2022,42(6):43−51.
ZHOU Dehua, CHEN Gang, CHEN Zhenlong, et a1. Exploration and development progress, key evaluation parameters and prospect of deep CBM in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(6): 43−51.
|
| [2] |
许耀波,朱玉双. 高阶煤的孔隙结构特征及其对煤层气解吸的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学,2020,31(1):84−92.
XU Yaobo, ZHU Yushuang. Pore structure characteristics of high rank coal and its effect on CBM desorption[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(1): 84−92.
|
| [3] |
刘娜,康永尚,李喆,等. 煤岩孔隙度主控地质因素及对煤层气开发的意义[J]. 现代地质,2018,32(5):963−974.
LIU Na, KANG Yongshang, LI Zhe, el al. Geological controlling factors of coal pore system and its significance in CBM development[J]. Geoscience, 2018, 32(5): 963−974.
|
| [4] |
李鑫. 准南高挥发分烟煤储层孔裂隙结构及其排采力学伤害机制[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学,2018.
|
| [5] |
LI Kejiang, KHANNA Rita, ZHANG Jianliang, et al. Comprehensive investigation of various structural features of bituminous coals using advanced analytical techniques[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(11): 7178−7189.
|
| [6] |
SONG Yu, JIANG Bo, SHAO Pei, et al. Matrix compression and multifractal characterization for tectonically deformed coals by Hg porosimetry[J]. Fuel, 2018, 211: 661−675. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.070
|
| [7] |
赵迪斐,郭英海,毛潇潇,等. 基于压汞、氮气吸附与FE-SEM 的无烟煤微纳米孔特征[J]. 煤炭学报,2017,42(6):1517−1526.
ZHAO Difei, GUO Yinghai, MAO Xiaoxiao, et al. Characteristics of macro-nanopores in anthracite coal based on mercury injection, nitrogen adsorption and FE-SEM[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2017, 42(6): 1517−1526.
|
| [8] |
戚灵灵,王兆丰,杨宏民,等. 基于低温氮吸附法和压汞法的煤样孔隙研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2012,40(8):36−39.
QI Lingling, WANG Zhaofeng, YANG Hongmin, et al. Study on porosity of coal samples based on low temperature nitrogen adsorption method and mercury porosimetry[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2012, 40(8): 36−39.
|
| [9] |
ZHENG Sijian, YAO Yanbin, LIU Dameng, et a1. Characterizations of full-scale pore size distribution porosity and permeability of coals: A novel methodology by nuclear magnetic resonance and fractal analysis theory[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2018, 196: 148−158. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2018.07.008
|
| [10] |
LIU Huihu, IBRAHIM Issa Farid, SANG Shuxun, et a1. Synthetical study on the difference and reason for the pore structure of the No. 3 coal reservoir from the southern Qinshui Basin, China, using mercury intrusion porosimetry, low-temperature N2 adsorption, low field nuclear magnetic resonance, and nuclear magnetic resonance cryoporometry[J]. Energy Reports, 2020, 6: 1876−1887. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.07.011
|
| [11] |
陈燕燕,邹才能,MASTALERZ M,等. 页岩微观孔隙演化及分形特征研究[J]. 天然气地球科学,2015,26(9):1646−1656.
CHEN Yanyan, ZOU Caineng, MASTALERZ M, et a1. Porosity and fractal characteristics of shale across a maturation gradient[J]. Nature Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(9): 1646−1656.
|
| [12] |
王民,关莹,李传明,等. 济阳坳陷沙河街组湖相页岩储层孔隙定性描述及全孔径定量评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2018,39(6):1107−1119.
WANG Min, GUAN Ying, LI Chuanming, et a1. Qualitative description and full-pore-size quantitative evaluation of pores in lacustrine shale reservoir of Shahejie Formation, Jiyang Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(6): 1107−1119.
|
| [13] |
焦堃,姚素平,吴浩,等. 页岩气储层孔隙系统表征方法研究进展[J]. 高校地质学报,2014,20(1):151−161.
JIAO Kun, YAO Suping, WU Hao, et a1. Advances in characterization of pore system of gas shales[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2014, 20(1): 151−161.
|
| [14] |
程丽媛,李伟. 基于压汞法的构造煤基质压缩特性及其对孔隙结构的影响[J]. 煤矿安全,2016,47(2):175−179.
CHENG Liyuan, LI Wei. Tectonic coal matrix compression characteristics based on mercury intrusion method and its impact on pore structure[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(2): 175−179.
|
| [15] |
刘厅,林柏泉,邹全乐,等. 杨柳煤矿割缝预抽后煤体孔隙结构变化特征[J]. 天然气地球科学,2015,26(10):1999−2008.
LIU Ting, LIN Baiquan, ZOU Quanle, et al. Pore characteristics of coal with the treatment of hydraulic slotting and gas pre-drainage in Yangliu coal mine[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(10): 1999−2008.
|
| [16] |
韩贝贝,秦勇,张政,等. 基于压汞试验的煤可压缩性研究及压缩量校正[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2015,43(3):68−72.
HAN Beibei, QIN Yong, ZHANG Zheng, et al. Study on coal compressibility and correction of compression amount based on compressibility of mercury injection test[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2015, 43(3): 68−72.
|
| [17] |
LI Yonghua. Compressibility and fractal dimension of fine coal particles in relation to pore structure characterisation using mercury porosimetry[J]. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 1999, 16(1): 25−31.
|
| [18] |
李阳,张玉贵,张浪,等. 基于压汞、低温N2吸附和CO2吸附的构造煤孔隙结构表征[J]. 煤炭学报,2019,44(4):1188−1196.
LI Yang, ZHANG Yugui, ZHANG Lang, et a1. Characterization on pore structure of tectonic coals based on the method of mercury intrusion, carbon dioxide adsorption and nitrogen adsorption[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2019, 44(4): 1188−1196.
|
| [19] |
CAI Yidong, LIU Dameng, PAN Zhejun, et al. Pore structure and its impact on CH4 adsorption capacity and flow capability of bituminous and subbituminous coals form Northeast China[J]. Fuel, 2013, 103: 258−268. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.055
|
| [20] |
陈义林,秦勇,田华,等. 基于压汞法无烟煤孔隙结构的粒度效应[J]. 天然气地球科学,2015,26(9):1629−1639.
CHEN Yilin, QIN Yong, TIAN Hua, et al. Particle size effect of pore structure of anthracite by mercury porosimetry[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(9): 1629−1639.
|
| [21] |
张志勇,廖光伦,唐桂宾,等. 压汞仪数据处理中消除水银封闭间隙体积的量化方法[J]. 矿物岩石,1997,17(3):49−52.
ZHANG Zhiyong, LIAO Guanglun, TANG Guibin. Quantitative method for eliminating mercury locked pore volume in the course of processing data from autoporeⅡ9220[J]. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 1997, 17(3): 49−52.
|
| [22] |
YAO Yanbin, LIU Dameng, CHE Yao, et al. Petrophysical characterization of coals by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)[J]. Fuel, 2010, 89(7): 1371−1380. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.11.005
|
| [23] |
ZHENG Sijian, YAO Yanbin, LIU Dameng, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance T2 cutoffs of coals: A novel method by multifractal analysis theory[J]. Fuel, 2019, 241: 715−724. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.12.044
|
| [24] |
BRUNAUER S, EMMETT P H, TELLER E. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1938, 60: 309−319. doi: 10.1021/ja01269a023
|
| [25] |
ZHANG Miao, FU Xuehai, DUAN Chaochao, et al. Influencing factor analysis of the coal matrix compressibility of middle-high rank coals[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 81: 103462. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103462
|
| [26] |
GB/T 21650.1—2008 压汞法和气体吸附法测定固体材料孔径分布和孔隙度第l部分:压汞法[S].
|
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: