• Chinese Core Periodicals
  • Chinese Core Journals of Science and Technology
  • RCCSE Chinese Authoritative Academic Journals
WANG Haidong, GAO Jiahui, CHEN Xuexi, LIANG Zhongqiu, GUAN Yongming, ZHEN Kangzhe. Influence of pore structure of coal on sensitivity of drillings gas desorption index[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(5): 169-174.
Citation: WANG Haidong, GAO Jiahui, CHEN Xuexi, LIANG Zhongqiu, GUAN Yongming, ZHEN Kangzhe. Influence of pore structure of coal on sensitivity of drillings gas desorption index[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(5): 169-174.

Influence of pore structure of coal on sensitivity of drillings gas desorption index

More Information
  • Published Date: May 19, 2023
  • In order to study the influence of low gas content and high gas pressure of the occurrence of the lower 5# coal seam of Yushuling Coal Mine in Xinjiang on the sensitivity of coal seam drillings gas desorption index, this paper adopted a constant temperature gas release test and low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption method to determine the gas adsorption law and pore composition of the coal samples of the lower 5# coal seam of Yushuling and the coal sample of Duanshi No.3 coal seam, to summarize and analyze the influence of pore structure characteristics and gas desorption rate of coal samples with different degrees of metamorphism on the accuracy of drillings desorption index. The results show that: the degree of coal metamorphism and pore structure have a great influence on gas desorption and diffusion rate, and the overall trend of gas desorption rate of Yushuling low-rank gas coal is stable in the first 10 min, while the trend of gas desorption rate of Duanshi high-rank anthracite is faster in the first 4 min and stable in the last 6 min; the correlation between drillings gas desorption index K1and gas pressure p of Yushuling coal is poorer than that of Δh2, while the correlation between K1 and gas pressure p is better than that of Δh2 for Duanshi coal drillings gas desorption index. The analysis concludes that Δh2 is more suitable as a predictor of the outburst of low-rank coal, and K1 is more suitable as a predictor of the outburst of high-rank coal.
  • [1]
    刘义孟, 董贺, 高杰.采动应力下煤钻屑瓦斯解吸指标试验研究[J].煤炭技术, 2020, 39(9): 135-138.

    LIU Yimeng, DONG He, GAO Jie. Test research on gas desorption index of drill cuttings under impact of mining stress[J]. Coal Technology, 2020, 39(9): 135-138.
    [2]
    李祥春, 李忠备, 张良, 等.不同煤阶煤样孔隙结构表征及其对瓦斯解吸扩散的影响[J].煤炭学报, 2019, 44(S1): 142-156.

    LI Xiangchun, LI Zhongbei, ZHANG Liang, et al. Porestructure characterization of various rank coals and its effect on gas desorption and diffusion[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2019, 44(S1): 142-156.
    [3]
    康志勤, 李翔, 李伟, 等.煤体结构与甲烷吸附/解吸规律相关性实验研究及启示[J].煤炭学报, 2018, 43(5): 1400-1407.

    KANG Zhiqin, LI Xiang, LI Wei, et al. Experimental investigation of methane adsorption/desorption behavior in coals with different coal-body structure and its revelation[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(5): 1400-1407.
    [4]
    李阳, 张玉贵, 张浪, 等.基于压汞、低温N2吸附和CO2吸附的构造煤孔隙结构表征[J].煤炭学报, 2019, 44(4): 1188-1196.

    LI Yang, ZHANG Yugui, ZHANG Lang, et al. Characterization on pore structure of tectonic coals based on the method of mercury intrusion, carbon dioxide adsorption and nitrogen adsprption[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2019, 44(4): 1188-1196.
    [5]
    张春旺, 李绍泉.低渗透煤的孔隙结构特征及其瓦斯吸附特性[J].煤矿安全, 2019, 50(1): 21-24.

    ZHANG Chunwang, LI Shaoquan. Pore structure and gas adsorption characteristics of coal with low permeability[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(1): 21-24.
    [6]
    GREGORY N Okolo, RAYMOND C Everson, HEIN WJP Neomagus, et al. Comparing the porosity and surface areas of coal as measured by gas adsorption, mercury intrusion and SAXS techniques[J]. Fuel, 2015, 141: 293-304.
    [7]
    胡彪, 程远平, 王亮.原生结构煤与构造煤孔隙结构与瓦斯扩散特性研究[J].煤炭科学技术, 2018, 46(3): 103-107.

    HU Biao, CHENG Yuanping, WANG Liang. Study on porous structure and gas diffusion characteristics of primarystructure coal and tectonic coal[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2018, 46(3): 103-107.
    [8]
    张建国, 周红星, 李喜员, 等.构造煤孔隙结构对瓦斯解吸及钻屑瓦斯解吸指标影响[J].西安科技大学学报, 2021, 41(1): 36-45.

    ZHANG Jianguo, ZHOU Hongxing, LI Xiyuan, et al. Influence of pore structure of tectonic coal on gas desorption and gas desorption index of drilling cuttings[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2021, 41(1): 36-45.
    [9]
    KATIE A Cychosz, MATTHIAS Thommes. Progress in the physisorption characterization of nanoporous gas storage materials[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(4): 279-295.
    [10]
    陈向军, 赵伞, 司朝霞, 等.不同变质程度煤孔隙结构分形特征对瓦斯吸附性影响[J].煤炭科学技术, 2020, 48(2): 118-124.

    CHEN Xiangjun, ZHAO San, SI Zhaoxia, et al. Fractal characteristics of pore structure of coal with different metamorphic degrees and its effect on gas adsorption characteristics[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2020, 48(2): 118-124.
    [11]
    张慧杰, 张浪, 汪东, 等.煤变质程度对瓦斯吸附能力的控制作用[J].煤矿安全, 2017, 48(7): 5-8.

    ZHANG Huijie, ZHANG Lang, WANG Dong, et al. Control effect of metamorphic grade of coal on gas adsorption capacity[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(7): 5-8.
    [12]
    JIN Kan, CHENG Yuanping, LIU Qingquan, et al. Experimental Investigation of Pore Structure Damage in Pulverized Coal: Implications for Methane Adsorption and Diffusion Characteristics[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(12): 10383-10395.
    [13]
    程远平, 胡彪.微孔填充-煤中甲烷的主要赋存形式[J].煤炭学报, 2021, 46(9): 2933-2948.

    CHENG Yuanping, HU Biao. Main occurrence form of methane in coal: Micropore filling[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(9): 2933-2948.
    [14]
    刘业忠.煤的孔隙结构对瓦斯吸附性能的影响[J].矿业装备, 2018(5): 58-59.

    LIU Yezhong. Effect of pore structure of coal on adsorption performance of gas[J]. Journal of Mining Equipment, 2018(5): 58-59.
  • Related Articles

    [1]YANG Xiaoyu, WANG Yiliang. Numerical simulation research on arrangement of spray nozzles outside fully mechanized excavation face[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(12): 40-47. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2023.12.007
    [2]WANG Fei, REN Peng, YAN Jingjing, GAO Yabin, LI Ziwen, HE Zhihong, LIU Zhenming. Numerical simulation and experimental research on ultrasonic atomization dust suppression device[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2021, 52(12): 29-34.
    [3]WEN Luchun. Simulation and Analysis of Parameters Optimization of Ultrasonic Atomizing Nozzle for Mine Atomizing Dust Removal[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(11): 109-112.
    [4]CHEN Chen, GUO Zengle, BAI Shumin. Numerical Simulation and Field Application of Swirling-cored Nozzle for Dust Suppression[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(5): 186-189.
    [5]LI Hongxi, ZHANG Jianlin, LIU Yanping, LIU Qiuzu. Simulation Research on Cavitation Flow Characteristics of Ultrasonic Atomization Nozzle for Mine Dust Suppression[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(1): 40-43.
    [6]ZHANG Jianlin, LI Hongxi, LIU Yanping. Experimental Research on Flow Field Simulation and Parameter Optimization of Ultrasonic Atomization Nozzle for Dust Suppression[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(12): 41-43.
    [7]LI Xiaojian, LIU Qiuzu, ZHANG Hong. Numerical Simulation on Atomization Characteristics of Lining Micro Oscillation Cavity Nozzle Based on CFD[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(11): 37-39.
    [8]HE Tingmei. Numerical Simulation of Oxygen Cylinder Burst for Breathing Apparatus[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(4): 112-114.
    [9]WANG Wen-jing, JIANG Zhong-an, CHEN Ju-shi, JIANG Lan, CAO Bei. Numerical Simulation Analysis of Inside and Outside Fields for Nozzles With Different Structures[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(11): 162-165.
    [10]QIAO Wei, SHANG Zhi-yuan, ZHANG Xin-jian, HAN Bao-deng. Numerical Simulation for Nozzle Characteristics of Hydraulic Slotting Based on Solidworks[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(4): 5-7.

Catalog

    Article views (13) PDF downloads (7) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return