Study on maximum explosion pressure and maximum pressure rise rate of premixed gas explosion in flameproof enclosure

LI Dong; DAI Shijie; ZHENG Hongwei; CUI Ziyao

Safety in Coal Mines > 2023 > 54(4): 216-221.

LI Dong, DAI Shijie, ZHENG Hongwei, CUI Ziyao. Study on maximum explosion pressure and maximum pressure rise rate of premixed gas explosion in flameproof enclosure[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(4): 216-221.

Citation:

PDF (2367 KB)

Study on maximum explosion pressure and maximum pressure rise rate of premixed gas explosion in flameproof enclosure

More Information

Published Date: April 19, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In order to study the variation law of the maximum explosion pressure and the maximum pressure rise rate of the premixed gas in the flameproof enclosure, three different flameproof enclosures were selected as the test samples, and the explosion was carried out by filling the premixed typical combustible gas in the flameproof enclosure. In the experiment, the relationship between maximum explosion pressure and its rise rate with the length-diameter ratio of the flameproof enclosure and the position of the ignition source was analyzed. In order to reveal the pressure piling phenomenon in the experiment, the mechanism was analyzed by numerical simulation. The results show that the maximum explosion pressure of the flameproof enclosure has a negative nonlinear relationship with the length-diameter ratio of the flameproof enclosure, the maximum explosion pressure is more affected by the surface area of the cavity, and the rate of increase of the maximum explosion pressure decreases with the increaseof the length-diameter ratio; the explosion-proof enclosure of the double-chamber communication structure is prone to pressure piling, and the ignition position in the pressure piling has a significant effect on the maximum explosion pressure and the maximum explosion pressure rise rate; the maximum pressure rise rate produced by hydrogen as a typical gas is significantly higher than that of ethylene.
- flameproof enclosure,
- length-diameter ratio,
- ignition location,
- pressure piling,
- heat loss

FullText(HTML)

References (19)

References

[1]	F Cammarota, A Di Benedetto, P Russo, et al. Experimental analysis of gas explosions at non-atmospheric initial conditions in cylindrical vessel[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2010, 88（5）: 341-349.
[2]	GB/T 3836.2—2021爆炸性环境第2部分：由隔爆外壳“d”保护的设备[S].
[3]	周伟锋.隔爆外壳爆炸压力测试方法与影响因素分析[J].煤炭科学技术，2012，40（3）：91-94. ZHOU Weifeng. Method to test explosion pressure of flameproof enclosure and analysis on influence factors[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2012, 40（3）: 91-94.
[4]	MUNRO J, KOU A, YE J. Flame Transmission at Extremely Low Temperatures When Pressure Piling Is Present[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2017, 53（2）: 1685-1693.
[5]	KRAUSE Tim, BEWERSDORFF Juergen, MARKUS Detlev. Investigations of static and dynamic stresses of flameproof enclosures[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2017, 49（2）: 775-784.
[6]	杨怀海，闫丹，杜鹏.隔爆型电机外壳强度的计算[J].防爆电机，2014，49（3）：27-29. YANG Huaihai, YAN Dan, DU Peng. Strength calculation for flame-proof motor enclosure[J]. Explosion-proof Electric Machine, 2014, 49（3）: 27-29.
[7]	李莹莹.基于有限元法的防爆箱螺栓联接快速优化设计[J].煤矿机械，2018，39（4）：132-135. LI Yingying. Fast optimization design of bolt connection of explosion-proof box based on finite element method[J]. Coal Mine Machinery, 2018, 39（4）: 132-135.
[8]	贺奎.压铸铝合金防爆箱体失爆分析及优化设计[J].煤矿机械，2018，39（5）：61-63. HE Kui. Analysis and optimum design of explosion loss case of die castingaluminum alloy[J]. Coal Mine Machinery, 2018, 39（5）: 61-63.
[9]	杨华.基于有限元法的高压变频器隔爆外壳设计[J].煤矿机电，2020，41（6）：35-38. YANG Hua. Design of flameproof enclosure of high voltage converter based on finite element method[J]. Colliery Mechanical ＆ Electrical Technology, 2020, 41（6）: 35-38.
[10]	AHIRWAL B, PRASAD R, KASHYAP S K, et al. Stress analysis due to internal explosion pressure of designed flameproof enclosure for hazardous area[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2020, 39（2）: 1-6.
[11]	鞠哲，陈凡东，贺振国，等.隔爆外壳中孔板结构对爆炸压力的叠加影响[J].煤矿安全，2014，45（5）：219-221. JU Zhe, CHEN Fandong, HE Zhenguo, et al. The superposition impact of orifice structure of flameproof enclosure on explosion pressure[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45（5）: 219-221.
[12]	张锦辉，陈志明.圆管状隔爆产品爆炸压力测试实验研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2019，15（5）：80-84. ZHANG Jinhui, CHEN Zhiming. Experimental study on explosion pressure testing for cylindrical flameproof products[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2019, 15（5）: 80-84.
[13]	GB/T 3836.1—2021爆炸性环境第1部分：设备通用要求[S].
[14]	GB/T 3836.15—2017爆炸性环境第15部分：电气装置的设计、选型和安装[S].
[15]	XIAO H, HOUIM R W, ORAN E S. Formation and evolution of distorted tulip flames[J]. Combustion & Flame, 2015, 162（11）: 4084-4101.
[16]	VISHWAKARMA R K, RANJAN V, KUMAR J. Comparison of explosion parameters for Methane-Air mixture in different cylindrical flameproof enclosures[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2014, 31: 82-87.
[17]	张英华，黄志安.燃烧与爆炸学[M].北京：冶金出版社，2012：140-141.
[18]	顾璠，黄亚继，刘道银.燃烧学基础[M].南京：东南大学出版社，2019：150.
[19]	ROGSTADKJERNET Lars. Combustion of Gas in Closed, Interconnected Vessels: Pressure Piling[D]. Bergen: University of Bergen, 2004.

[1]	MA Xiang, BAI Xianxi, CAO Anye, ZENG Haili, HUANG Rui, ZHANG Debing, QIN Xufeng, ZHANG Runbing. Study on evolution law of overburden structure based on microseismic distribution characteristics[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(12): 80-87. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2023.12.012
[2]	LI Minghu. Micro-seismic source location algorithm based on spatio-temporal distribution of arrival times[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(7): 93-100.
[3]	ZHANG Pengming, ZHANG Yulong, WANG Dapeng, HAN Changjiang, WANG Junfeng, HAO Zijing, ZHOU Chunshan. Static and dynamic distribution characteristics and migration law of gas in goaf of short distance coal seams[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(1): 46-55.
[4]	HU Quanhong, YAN Peng, HUANG Guangli. Study on Distribution Law of Coal Seam Gas and Hydrogen Sulfide in Area Affected by Abandoned Oil Wells[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(12): 147-151.
[5]	BIAN Menglong. PM2.5 Dust Concentration Distribution Law of Open Pit Coal Mine During Perforation and Transportion[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(4): 50-53.
[6]	WANG Lianhe, WU Guanghui, SU Zhenguo, XU Yonggang. Research on Mine Earthquake Law for Tunneling Roadway in Folded Region[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(2): 40-42.
[7]	LIU Hui. Microseismic Activity Law Analysis of Failure and Deformation of Special Igneous Rock[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(7): 183-186.
[8]	WANG Shi-chao. Power Spectrum Laws of Microseism Signal Before and After Rock Burst[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(11): 50-52.
[9]	DENG Zhi-gang. Rock-burst Monitoring Technology Based on ARAMIS M/E Micro-seismic Monitoring System[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(5): 105-107.
[10]	LIU Qian, LIN Bai-quan, ZHU Chuan-jie, JIANG Bing-you, LIU Yang. Numerical Analysis of Distribution Laws of Carbon Monoxide in Coal Mine Goaf[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(2): 168-171.

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (23) PDF downloads (17)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Study on maximum explosion pressure and maximum pressure rise rate of premixed gas explosion in flameproof enclosure

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Catalog

Study on maximum explosion pressure and maximum pressure rise rate of premixed gas explosion in flameproof enclosure

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content