• Chinese Core Periodicals
  • Chinese Core Journals of Science and Technology
  • RCCSE Chinese Authoritative Academic Journals
FAN Yongpeng, HUO Zhonggang, WANG Yong. Numerical simulation of CO2-ECBM based on fluid-solid-thermal coupled model[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2022, 53(2): 162-169.
Citation: FAN Yongpeng, HUO Zhonggang, WANG Yong. Numerical simulation of CO2-ECBM based on fluid-solid-thermal coupled model[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2022, 53(2): 162-169.

Numerical simulation of CO2-ECBM based on fluid-solid-thermal coupled model

More Information
  • Published Date: February 19, 2022
  • In order to analyze the effect of coal reservoir characteristic parameters on CO2-ECBM project, based on the non-isothermal competitive adsorption and seepage characteristics of binary gas, a fluid-solid-thermal coupled model of CO2-ECBM was established. The effects of initial reservoir temperature, permeability, and pressure on permeability, CH4 production rate, and CO2 storage rate were studied by numerical simulation. Results show that: CH4 production rate drops rapidly in the initial stage of pumping, after that, the production rate slowly decreases with the increase of the extraction time; the CO2 storage rate can be divided into three stages: initial rapid reduction, almost stable in the middle period, and slowly decreasing in the later period; in the gas extraction process without CO2 injection, the variation of permeability is competition result of two types of factors: the coal matrix shrinkage caused by temperature reduction and gas desorption increase, the other is the coal matrix expansion caused by gas pressure decrease, so the permeability follows the rule of first decreasing and then increasing with the extraction time, the injection of CO2 has a great influence on the permeability of coalbed, adsorption of CO2 by the coal matrix causes the permeability to drop rapidly; under the same conditions, the CH4 production rate and CO2 storage rate are inversely proportional to the initial reservoir temperature and are proportional to the initial reservoir permeability and initial reservoir pressure.
  • [1]
    Jiang Z M. Reflections on energy issues in China[J]. China Nuclear Power, 2008(1): 98-113.
    [2]
    张松航,唐书恒,潘哲军,等.晋城无烟煤CO2-ECBM数值模拟研究[J].煤炭学报,2011,36(10):1741.

    ZHANG Songhang, TANG Shuheng, PAN Zhejun, et al. Numerical simulation of CO2 enhanced coalbed methane recovery on Jincheng anthracite coal reservoir[J]. Journal of China Coal Science, 2011, 36(10): 1741.
    [3]
    王杰祥,陈征,赵密福,等.煤层气藏CO2-ECBM注入参数优化研究[J].特种油气藏,2014,21(5):115-118.

    WANG Jiexiang, CHEN Zheng, ZHAO Mifu, et al. Optimization of CO2-ECBM injection parameters for coal gas reservoir[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2014, 21(5): 115-118.
    [4]
    孙可明.煤层气注气开采多组分流体扩散模型数值模拟[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2005,24(3):305-308.

    SUN Keming. Model and numerical simulation about multispecies fluid diffusion and seepage in exploitation coalbed methane by gas injection[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University, 2005, 24(3): 305-308.
    [5]
    郑爱玲,王新海,刘德华.注气驱替煤层气数值模拟研究[J].石油钻探技术,2006,34(2):55-57.

    ZHENG Ailing, WANG Xinhai, LIU Dehua. Research on numerical simulation of enhaneed coalbed methane reeovery by injecting gas[J]. Petroleum Drlling Techniques, 2006, 34(2): 55-57.
    [6]
    吴嗣跃,郑爱玲.注气驱替煤层气的三维多组分流动模型[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(4):580-583.

    WU Siyue, ZHENG Ailing. A three-dimension multicomponent flow model of enhanced coalbed methane recovery by gas injection[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2007, 18(4): 58-583.
    [7]
    PERERA M S A, RANJITH P G, RANATHUNGA A S, et al. Optimization of enhanced coal-bed methane recovery using numerical simulation[J]. Journal of Geophysics & Engineering, 2015, 12(1): 90-107.
    [8]
    吴宇.煤层中封存二氧化碳的双重孔隙力学效应研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2010:103-104.
    [9]
    冯启言,周来,陈中伟,等.煤层处置 CO2的二元气-固耦合数值模拟[J].高校地质学报,2009,5(1):63.

    FENG Qiyan, ZHOU Lai, CHEN Zhongwei, et al. Numerical simulation of coupled binary gas-solid interaction during carbon dioxide sequestration in a coal bed geological[J]. Journal of China Universities, 2009, 15(1): 63-68.
    [10]
    FAN Y, DENG C, ZHANG X, et al. Numerical study of CO2-enhanced coalbed methane recovery[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 76: 12-23.
    [11]
    XIA T, ZHOU F, GAO F, et al. Simulation of coal self-heating processes in underground methane-rich coal seams[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2015, 141-142: 1-12.
    [12]
    ZHANG H, LIU J, Elsworth D. How sorption-induced matrix deformation affects gas flow in coal seams: a new FE model[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2008, 45(8): 1226-1236.
    [13]
    GUO Hongguang, YU Zhisheng, ZHANG Hongxun. Phylogenetic diversity of microbial communities associated with coalbed methane gas from Eastern Ordos Basin, China[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2015, 150-151: 120-126.
    [14]
    ZHU W C, WEI CH, LIU J, et al. A model of coal-gas interaction under variable temperatures[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2011, 86(2-3): 213.
    [15]
    LI S, Fan C, Han J, et al. A fully coupled thermal-hydraulic-mechanical model with two-phase flow for coalbed methane extraction[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2016, 33: 324-336.
    [16]
    KONG X, WANG E, LIU Q, et al. Dynamic permeability and porosity evolution of coal seam rich in CBM based on the flow-solid coupling theory[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering 2017, 40: 61-71.
    [17]
    WU Y, LIU J, ELSWORTH D, et al. Dual poroelastic response of a coal seam to CO2 injection[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2009, 4(4): 668-678.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LIU Jiajia, YANG Ming, WEI Chunrong. Numerical Simulation of Optimization for Drainage Negative Pressure of High Level Suction Roadway[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(2): 35-38,42.
    [2]ZHANG Jiayong, CUI Xiao, ZHOU Fengzeng, WANG Kai, XU Shen. Numerical Simulation on Crack Radius of Coal Seam Drilling by Static Blasting[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(12): 146-149.
    [3]CAI Peipei, ZHAO Yaojiang, GUO Jinyan. Numerical Simulation Study on Gas Drainage in Extra Long Borehole Based on COMSOL Multiphysics[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(8): 132-135.
    [4]DONG Hongjuan, ZHANG Jinshan, LI Wenzhe, WANG Yan. Research on Time Varying Laws of Extraction Radius for Bedding Directional 1 000 m Long Drilling[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(3): 9-12.
    [5]LIU Li, LI Shugang, LIU Chao, XING Lijie. Drilling Holes Spacing Optimization for Breaking Roof Blasting Pressure Releasing in Deep Hole of Jixian Coal Mine[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(10): 137-139.
    [6]LIU Feifei, HUANG Yuanyue, XU Quan, LI Shuai, ZHAO Pengtao, QIN Zuoya, HUANG Bing. Numerical Simulation of Seepage-heat Similarity for Effective Radius of Drilling Gas Drainage[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(12): 1-5.
    [7]LIU Ting, LIN Baiquan, ZOU Quanle, SHEN Chunming, ZHANG Zhen, YANG Wei. Measurement of Effective Drainage Radius Based on Primitive Gas Content and Pressure for Slotted Drilling[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(8): 8-11.
    [8]WU Lei, DAI Guang-long, YANG Zhi-lei. Experimental Study on Effective Extraction Radius for Bedding Hole[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(5): 4-6.
    [9]WANG Zhao-feng, LI Yan-tao, XIA Hui-hui, TAN Rong-hui. Numerical Simulation on Effective Drainage Radius of Drill Hole Along Coal Seam Based on COMSOL[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(10): 4-6.
    [10]NING Zhi-yong, LI Sheng. Numerical Simulation on Gas Extraction Parameters Optimization in Soft and Low Permeability Coal Seam of Wuyang Coal Mine[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(10): 1-3.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 李龙龙,李雨成,刁友鹏,任建业. 声波速度反演呼吸器氢氧化钙有效性研究. 太原理工大学学报. 2023(06): 1076-1082 .
    2. 夏海燕. 水泥中氧化钙含量检测终点的返色现象及消除途径探究. 江西化工. 2021(06): 47-49 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (54) PDF downloads (19) Cited by(2)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return