• Chinese Core Periodicals
  • Chinese Core Journals of Science and Technology
  • RCCSE Chinese Authoritative Academic Journals
KOU Jianxin, ZHANG Jinjing, SUN Juzheng, ZHOU Yang, SUN Weiji. Pressure Relief Effect of Overlapping Mining of Upper Protective Layer with Large Spacing[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(9): 179-186.
Citation: KOU Jianxin, ZHANG Jinjing, SUN Juzheng, ZHOU Yang, SUN Weiji. Pressure Relief Effect of Overlapping Mining of Upper Protective Layer with Large Spacing[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(9): 179-186.

Pressure Relief Effect of Overlapping Mining of Upper Protective Layer with Large Spacing

More Information
  • Published Date: September 19, 2020
  • The first mining area of Pingmei No.8 mine was selected as the research object, through FLAC3D numerical simulation method combined with field measurement results of drilling cuttings, the protection effect of large spacing upper protective layer on lower coal was analyzed. The research results show that the pressure relief effect of group Ⅳ coal seam mining on group Ⅴ coal seam is 42%, and the inclination pressure relief angle is 75° on the lower side and 65° on the upper side, which has a certain pressure relief protection effect, and the decompression effect on group Ⅵ is 6%, but the decompression effect is not obvious; decompression effect of group Ⅴ mining on the coal seam of group Ⅵ is 17%, and the inclination pressure relief angle is 77° on the lower side and 71° on the upper side; the decompression effect was further enhanced after the joint mining of Ⅳ-Ⅴ, and the decompression effect of Ⅳ-Ⅴ on the coal seam of the group Ⅵ was 20% after Ⅳ-Ⅴ mining, and the inclination pressure relief angle is 77° on the lower side and 72° on the upper side; the overlapping and staggered layout of the spatial projection on the working face of each coal group makes the pressure relief zone of group Ⅳ and group Ⅴ play a role of mutual shielding in the mining process, eliminating the influence of stress concentration and playing a good protection role for the coal seam of group Ⅵ.
  • [1]
    唐巨鹏,陈帅,于宁.基于平均有效应力煤与瓦斯突出钻屑量指标研究[J].地球物理学进展,2017,32(1):395-400.
    [2]
    李连昌.新安煤田二1煤层煤与瓦斯突出危险程度预测[D].焦作:河南理工大学,2010.
    [3]
    刘光雨,冯雷.数值模拟在保护层上覆煤层应力分析中的应用[J].中州煤炭,2013(6):40-42.
    [4]
    李思乾.深井远距离上保护层开采卸压效果研究[J].煤矿安全,2018,49(10):179-182.
    [5]
    杨瑜.红阳二矿煤层瓦斯基础参数测定和保护层开采瓦斯涌出规律[D].阜新:辽宁工程技术大学,2013.
    [6]
    胡建华,罗先伟,周科平,等.碎裂矿段层间采动应力规律与优化[J].矿冶工程,2011,31(5):18-21.
    [7]
    鲜学福,辜敏,李晓红.煤与瓦斯突出的激发和发生条件[J].岩土力学,2009,30(3):577-581.
    [8]
    程五一,张序明,吴福昌.煤与瓦斯突出区域预测理论及技术[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2005.
    [9]
    赵志刚,谭云亮.基于混沌理论的煤与瓦斯突出前兆时序预测研究[J].岩土力学,2009,30(7):2186.
    [10]
    尹光志,李晓泉,赵洪宝.钻屑量与矿山压力及瓦斯压力关系现场实验研究[J].北京科技大学学报,2010,32(1):1-7.
    [11]
    吕有厂.平顶山矿区地形曲率对瓦斯赋存的影响[J].能源与环保,2018,40(3):104-107.
    [12]
    程志恒.近距离煤层群保护层开采裂隙演化及渗流特征研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学(北京),2015.
    [13]
    陈亮.中远距离煤层群叠加开采双重卸压效应数值分析[J].煤炭工程,2018,50(7):92-96.
    [14]
    刘小刚,张艺山,于志方.基于FLAC3D的层状岩石强度特征研究[J].矿冶工程,2018,38(6):39-43.
    [15]
    唐巨鹏,陈帅,李卫军.考虑有效应力的钻屑量理论分析及试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2018,40(1):130-138.
    [16]
    易俊,姜永东,鲜学福.应力场、温度场瓦斯渗流特性实验研究[J].中国矿业,2007,16(5):113-116.
    [17]
    汪大海,贺少辉,刘夏冰,等.基于主应力旋转特征的浅埋隧道上覆土压力计算及不完全拱效应分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(6):1284-1296.
    [18]
    楼一珊.地层倾角对地应力的影响研究[J].钻采工艺,1998(6):22-23.
    [19]
    周洋,梁冰,孙维吉,等.深部煤层钻屑粒度随钻进深度分布规律[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(1):66-72.
  • Related Articles

    [1]HAN Feilin, ZHENG Chunshan, XUE Sheng, WANG Zhigen, WANG Yong. Study on Distribution Characteristics of Floor Stress Field Induced by the First Mined Coal Seam[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(12): 263-269.
    [2]SA Zhanyou, WANG Li, LI Lei, LU Weidong, LU Shouqing, YANG Shuai. Decompression Deformation and Stress Distribution of Underlying Coal Seam in Upper Protective Coal Seam Mining[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(7): 61-65.
    [3]LIU Xiao. Depth Effect of Mining Stress Distribution Characteristics[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(6): 163-167,173.
    [4]YANG Chuangqian, FENG Guorui. Numerical Simulation on Stress Distribution Law During Upward Mining in Wedge Pillar Mining Area[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(5): 56-60.
    [5]XUAN Zhongtang, ZHAO Shankun, GUO Gang, LYU Kun. Study on Stress Distribution Laws of Crossing and Mining Open-off Cut[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(8): 221-225.
    [6]DONG Peng, ZHAO Jian. Influence of Working Face Strike on Fault Activation and Stress Distribution[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(11): 229-232.
    [7]LI Ke, ZHANG Kaizhi, ZHANG Jinhong. Stress Distribution and Failure Characteristics of Coal Seam Floor Mining[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(6): 192-195.
    [8]FENG Yufeng, ZHAO Jie, WANG Chen. Floor Stress Distribution Laws of Mining Above Gob in Close Distance Coal Seams[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(7): 30-33.
    [9]LUO Kun, HE Lihui, SUN Yuliang. Underground Ground Stress Field Measurements and the Analysis of Stress Fields Distribution Laws in Qianyingzi Coal Mine[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(1): 32-35.
    [10]XU Hai-tao, LI Peng, TIAN Xiao, LIU Zheng-he. The Overburden Caving and Strata Stress Distribution Laws in Large Mining Height Fully-mechanized Mining Face[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(8): 30-32.

Catalog

    Article views (47) PDF downloads (0) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return