• Chinese Core Periodicals
  • Chinese Core Journals of Science and Technology
  • RCCSE Chinese Authoritative Academic Journals
LIU Chuanhai, WU Qiang, ZHANG Baoyong, ZHANG Jiahao, ZHANG Qiang, WU Qiong. Effect of Atomization Nozzle Angle on Hydration Separation of Gas[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(3): 1-4,8.
Citation: LIU Chuanhai, WU Qiang, ZHANG Baoyong, ZHANG Jiahao, ZHANG Qiang, WU Qiong. Effect of Atomization Nozzle Angle on Hydration Separation of Gas[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(3): 1-4,8.

Effect of Atomization Nozzle Angle on Hydration Separation of Gas

More Information
  • Published Date: March 19, 2018
  • In order to improve the hydration separation effect of high concentration CH4 gas, the separation experiment of high concentration CH4 gas hydrate under the influence of spray nozzle angle was carried out by using the gas rapid hydrating spray experiment device. The influence of nozzle angle on recovery and separation factor of CH4 was discussed by combining gas hydration with the end gas-solid chromatography. The results show that: CH4 gas samples with concentration of 60% and nozzle angles of 30°, 45°, 60°, 90° corresponding CH4 recovery rates are 20.69%, 24.23%, 16.83% and 15.39%, respectively, and the separation factors are 1.69, 1.89, 1.55, 1.49; CH4 gas samples with concentration of 70% and nozzle angles of 30°, 45°, 60° 90° corresponding recovery rates of CH4 are 22.44%, 25.27%, 19.63% and 17.87%, respectively, the separation factors are 1.67,1.83, 1.52, 1.4; CH4 gas samples with concentration of 80% and nozzle angles of 30°, 45°, 60° and 90° corresponding recovery rates of CH4 are 22.36%, 24.51%, 18.81% and 16.14%, respectively, and the separation factors were 1.90, 1.95, 1.76, 1.75. The three kinds of CH4 gas recovery and separation factors increase first and then decrease with the increase of the nozzles angle, and the influence sequence is 45°> 30°> 60°> 90°.
  • [1]
    Guo Hua, Yuan Liang. An integrated approach to study of strata behaviour and gas flow dynamics and its application [J]. International Journal of coal Science & Technology, 2015, 2(1): 12-21.
    [2]
    Cheng Yuanping, Wang Liang, Liu Hongyong, et al. Definition, theory, methods, and applications of the safe and efficient simultaneous extraction of coal and gas [J]. International Journal of coal Science & Technology, 2015, 2(1): 52-65.
    [3]
    张强,吴强,张保勇,等.干水对瓦斯混合气水合分离动力学影响研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2014,43(4):593-599.
    [4]
    吴强,李成林,江传力.瓦斯水合物生成控制因素探讨[J].煤炭学报,2005,30(3):283-287.
    [5]
    吴强,张保勇.THF-SDS对矿井瓦斯水合分离影响研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2010,39(4):484-489.
    [6]
    Lucia Brinchi, Beatrice Castellani, Federico Rossi, et al. Experimental investigations on scaled-up methane hydrate production with surfactant promotion: Energy considerations [J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2014, 120: 187-193.
    [7]
    Kazuya Fukumoto, Jun-ichiro Tobe, Ryo Ohmura, et al. Hydrate formation using water spraying in a hydrophobic gas: A preliminary study [J]. Environmental and Energy, 2001, 47(8): 1899 -1904.
    [8]
    刘道平,潘云仙,周文铸,等.喷雾制取天然气水合物过程的特性[J].上海理工大学学报,2007,29(2):132.
    [9]
    赵建忠,赵阳升,石定贤.喷雾法合成气体水合物的实验研究[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2006,25(2):286-289.
    [10]
    张亮,刘道平,樊燕,等.喷雾反应器中甲烷水合物生长动力学模型[J].化学反应工程与工艺,2008,24(5):385-389.
    [11]
    钟栋梁,杨晨,刘道平,等.喷雾反应器中二氧化碳水合物的生长实验研究[J].过程工程学报,2010,10(2):309-313.
    [12]
    Mohammad Kazemeini, Farideh Freidoonian, Moslem Fattahi. Developing a Mathematical Model for Hydrate Formation in a Spray Batch Reactor [J]. Advances in Materials Physics and Chemistry, 2013, 2(4): 244-247.
    [13]
    Federico Rossi, Mirko Filipponi, Beatrice Castellani. Investigation on a novel reactor for gas hydrate production [J]. Applied Energy, 2012, 99(6): 167-172.
    [14]
    Linga P, Kumar R, Englezos P. The clathrate hydrate process for post and pre-combustion capture of carbon dioxide [J]. Hazard Mater, 2007, 149 (3): 625-629.
    [15]
    吴强,王世海,张保勇,等.THF对高浓度CH4瓦斯水合分离效果影响实验[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(5):1158-1164.
    [16]
    钟栋梁,刘道平,邬志敏,等.天然气水合物在喷雾装置中的制备[J].上海理工大学学报,2009,31(1):27-30.
  • Related Articles

    [1]XING Xiuju. Mine Transient Electromagnetic Fixed Point Three-dimensional Advance Detection Technology[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(2): 67-71,75.
    [2]LI Huanyu, XING Yuzhong, YAN Jingjing, YU Long. Study on Damage Range of Overlying Coal Seam Floor in Goaf Based on Electromagnetic Prospecting Technology[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(7): 201-204.
    [3]GUAN Wanli. Spontaneous Combustion Control Technology in Overlying Goaf of Bulianta Coal Mine[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(s1): 32-36,42.
    [4]WEN Hu, ZHANG Duo, ZHENG Xuezhao. Research Progress and Trend of Life Detection Technology of Drilling and Rescue in Mine[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(9): 85-88.
    [5]ZHOU Junjie, WU Zepeng, DU Zhenchuan, JIN Kankun. Comprehensive Recognition Technology of Collapsed Column in Coalfield[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(6): 74-77.
    [6]WANG Zhanfeng, LI Bo. A Fine Detection Technology for the Best Extraction Layer in Mining Fissure Zone[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(10): 70-72.
    [7]SHAO Hongqi. Integrated and Stereo Detection Technology of Roof Water Disaster at S1210 Working Face in Ningtiaota Coal Mine[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(4): 81-83,87.
    [8]XU Kai-yu, LI Hao-dang. A Detection Technology for Small Gob Zones in Open-pit Mining Area Based on Transient Electromagnetic Method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(7): 95-97.
    [9]MU Yi. Mine Advanced Detailed Detection Technology Method and Optimization[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(11): 88-91.
    [10]ZHAO Jian-jun, XU Zhi-min. Transient Electromagnetic Detection and Control of Overlying Old Gob Water in Thick Seam Mining[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(9): 79-82.

Catalog

    Article views (218) PDF downloads (0) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return