• Chinese Core Periodicals
  • Chinese Core Journals of Science and Technology
  • RCCSE Chinese Authoritative Academic Journals
YU Jun. Research on Structural Difference for Different Soft and Hard Coal Samples[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(12): 5-8.
Citation: YU Jun. Research on Structural Difference for Different Soft and Hard Coal Samples[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(12): 5-8.

Research on Structural Difference for Different Soft and Hard Coal Samples

More Information
  • Published Date: December 19, 2017
  • In order to investigate the microstructural difference of different soft and hard coal, taking Wangzhuang Coal Mine of Shanxi Lu’an Group as the engineering background. Aimed at 6 different soft and hard coal samples, the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to analyze the surface morphology features. The pore structural characteristics of these soft and hard coal samples were also studied combined with low temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption method. The comparison of microstructural difference was made among soft and hard coal samples with different metamorphism and deformation degree. The research results show that tectonic deformation has significant influence on surface structure of soft coal. Compared with hard coal, soft coal has more rough surface and contains more complex pore structure. Coalification also has great impact on pore structure. The pore diameter of coal gradually declines with increasing coalification, but the total specific surface area increases. For all the studied samples, micropore occupies more than 60% of the total specific surface area, making it as the main contributor. The average pore diameter of soft coal is always smaller than that of corresponding hard coal, but it is inverse for pore specific surface area. Tectonic deformation complicates the pore structure of coal, and tectonic soft coal has precocious evolution characteristics.
  • [1]
    姜波,琚宜文.构造煤结构及其储层物性特征[J].天然气工业,2004,24(5):27-29.
    [2]
    琚宜文,姜波,王桂梁,等.构造煤结构及储层物性[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2005:82-117.
    [3]
    Han Y, Xu R, Hou Q, et al. Deformation mechanisms and macromolecular structure response of anthracite under different stress[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(2): 975-983.
    [4]
    沈仲辉,李希建,徐明智.贵州矿区煤孔隙结构及其等温吸附特性研究[J].煤矿安全,2017,48(1):9-12.
    [5]
    Sharon M S, Maria D M,Mark A E, et al. Pore characteristics of Wilcox Group Coal, U. S. Gulf Coast Region: Implications for the occurrence of coalbed gas[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2015, 139(1): 80.
    [6]
    么玉鹏,姜波,李明.淮北朱仙庄矿构造煤孔隙结构及其分形表征研究[J].煤炭工程,2016,48(5):98-101.
    [7]
    曹代勇,李小明,张守仁.构造应力对煤化作用的影响—应力降解机制与应力缩聚机制[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2006,36(1):59-68.
    [8]
    王振.突出煤体的瓦斯解吸特征及其影响因素分析[J].矿业安全与环保,2017,44(1):102-105.
    [9]
    孟召平,刘珊珊,王保玉,等.不同煤体结构煤的吸附性能及其孔隙结构特征[J].煤炭学报,2015,40(8):1865-1870.
    [10]
    屈争辉,姜波,汪吉林,等.构造煤微孔特征及成因探讨[J].煤炭学报,2015,40(5):1093-1102.
    [11]
    宋晓夏,唐跃刚,李伟,等.中梁山南矿构造煤吸附孔分形特征[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(1):134-139.
    [12]
    张玉贵,张子敏,曹运兴.构造煤结构与瓦斯突出[J].煤炭学报,2007,32(3):281-284.
    [13]
    Pan J, Lv M, Bai H, et al. Effects of metamorphism and deformation on the coal macromolecular structure by laser Raman spectroscopy[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(2): 1136-1146.
    [14]
    Frodsham K, Gayer R A. The impact of tectonic deformation upon coal seams in the South Wales coalfield, UK[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 1999, 38(3): 297-332.
    [15]
    聂百胜,柳先锋,郭建华,等.水分对煤体瓦斯解吸扩散的影响[J].中国矿业大学学报,2015,44(5):781.
    [16]
    王宝俊,章丽娜,凌丽霞,等.煤分子结构对煤层气吸附与扩散行为的影响[J].化工学报,2016,67(6):2548-2557.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Xin, LI Wenpu, SHAO He, ZHENG Yiyi, GAO Yurong, CHEN Xi. Mathematical model for droplet size prediction of gas-water nozzle based on orthogonal experiment[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2025, 56(1): 72-78. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.20231556
    [2]XUE Honglai, MIN Zheng, WEN Zhe. Study on mathematical relationship of classical diffusion models of coal containing methane[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2024, 55(10): 1-8. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.20231096
    [3]JI Chaohui. Research progress of coalbed gas migration model in China[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2024, 55(6): 8-18. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.20231900
    [4]WANG Lei, LYU Yahui, WANG Cong. Mathematical Model of Desorption Curve and Desorption Gas Content Test Method for Low-rank Coal Samples[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(7): 12-16.
    [5]ZENG Jianqiang, HUA Bin, TAN Zhenglin. Adaptability Evaluation of Mathematical Model of Capillary Pressure for High-rank Coalbed Methane[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(9): 17-20.
    [6]XUE Honglai, GUAN Cheng, FU Shuai, DONG Lihui, WANG Feiyin. Theoretical Model of Early Diffusion in Coal Particles Containing Methane and Its Analytical Solution[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(3): 164-167.
    [7]JIA Xingwang, WANG Enyuan. Coal Burst Tendency Classification Based on Attribute Mathematical Model[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(4): 156-158,162.
    [8]HE Yong-sheng. The Mathematical Model Establishment of Coal Gas Diffusion Initial Speed △p [J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(8): 14-17.
    [9]FAN Hai-dong, CAI Cheng-gong, WANG Yao, WANG Tian-tai. Establishment of Mathematical Model about Drilling Gas Inrush Initial Rate[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(2): 112-115.
    [10]YANG Rong, ZHANG Ren-wei, LI Ying-hua, SHI Jian-li. Application of Mathematical Models for CO Emission Prediction[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(1): 89-92.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 胡宝岭,李伟,王磊,王彦恒. 晶闸管串级调速的矿井通风自动化监控技术研究. 自动化技术与应用. 2025(03): 146-150 .
    2. 贾进章,尚文天,雷涛,李欣垚. 矿井智能通风发展趋势. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(05): 545-555 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (196) PDF downloads (0) Cited by(2)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return