• Chinese Core Periodicals
  • Chinese Core Journals of Science and Technology
  • RCCSE Chinese Authoritative Academic Journals
ZHANG Xing-Yang. Application of Mathematical Methods in Evaluation of Top-coal Caving and Drawing Characteristics[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(8): 204-206.
Citation: ZHANG Xing-Yang. Application of Mathematical Methods in Evaluation of Top-coal Caving and Drawing Characteristics[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(8): 204-206.

Application of Mathematical Methods in Evaluation of Top-coal Caving and Drawing Characteristics

More Information
  • Published Date: August 09, 2012
  • Mine fully-mechanized caving mining technology is used to exploit No.8 coal seam in Guobei coal mine.In order to evaluate and classify the top-coal caving and drawing characteristics of No.8 coal seam,taking 8203 working face as an example,using mining depth,thickness and strength of coal seam,thickness and strength of parting,crack growth degree as evaluation factors,fuzzy math method and function calculation classification method combined with AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) are adopted to evaluate top coal caving and drawing characteristics.As a result,analysis and practice show that top-coal caving and drawing characteristics in 8203 working face is extremely good.
  • [1]
    李孟臻,张东升,吕修明.综放工作面顶煤冒放性评价[J].矿山压力与顶板管理,2003(3):64-66.
    [2]
    靳钟铭.放顶煤开采理论与技术[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2001.
    [3]
    李奎来.神东矿区保德煤矿8-1煤顶煤可放性研究[J].煤矿开采,2009,14(6):25-27.
    [4]
    宋选民,靳钟铭,康天合.放顶煤开采顶煤冒放性影响规律研究[J].山西矿业学院学报,1995(3):264-271.
    [5]
    宋晓秋.模糊数学原理与方法[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2004.
    [6]
    林在康,左秀峰,涂兴子.矿业信息及计算机应用[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2005.
  • Related Articles

    [1]OUYANG Zhenhua, XU Qianhai, ZHANG Ningbo, ZHANG Tianzi, GUO Haoran, WANG Jiajia. Classification and weighting evaluation method for rock burst prevention safety and its application in coal mine[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2024, 55(10): 82-90. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.20240913
    [2]YANG Zongnan, SUN Changyan, FAN Yigang, XU Mengtang, SUN Junyi, YU Lizhu. Study on sweet layers evaluation method for coal measures gas joint development[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(1): 62-69.
    [3]LIU Ming, LI Kuan, WU Yongping, LYU Wenyu. Safety Evaluation and Application for Flying Gangue of Steeply Dipping Coal Seam Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(2): 244-247.
    [4]XU Xing, TIAN Kunyun, ZHAO Xintao, LI Fengqin. Coal Mine Water Disaster Safety Evaluation Based on Compromise Weight and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(9): 241-244.
    [5]WANG Zhen. Discussion on Classification and Identification Method for Dynamic Disasters of Coal and Rock[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(6): 176-179.
    [6]LEI Wulin, ZHOU Hualong, JIANG Siyang, YU Lan, HE Jiangyi. Application of Normal Cloud Model in Surrounding Rock Classification of Coal Roadway[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(5): 194-197.
    [7]LAN Zequan, WANG Zhiliang, ZHANG Yuebing, QI Liming. Study on Coal and Gas Outburst Risk Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(3): 159-163.
    [8]WANG Jiangrong, LUO Ziqin, WEN Hui. Application of Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model in Recognition of Coal Samples[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(12): 123-125,128.
    [9]ZHU Jing. Coal Mine Safety Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(4): 226-228.
    [10]WEI Da-Yong, WANG Fei, XU Jin-peng, XU Qing-qing. Risk Evaluation of Mine Water Inrush Based on the Fractal and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(8): 184-186.

Catalog

    Article views (809) PDF downloads (0) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return