• Chinese Core Periodicals
  • Chinese Core Journals of Science and Technology
  • RCCSE Chinese Authoritative Academic Journals
AN Yu, LI Dan. Study on Unsafe Acts in Coal and Gas Outburst Accidents[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(7): 251-253.
Citation: AN Yu, LI Dan. Study on Unsafe Acts in Coal and Gas Outburst Accidents[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(7): 251-253.

Study on Unsafe Acts in Coal and Gas Outburst Accidents

More Information
  • Published Date: July 19, 2016
  • In order to reduce the accidents of coal and gas outburst, we divide employees into 4 rankings, which are the front-line staff, the group leader, the supervisor, the senior manager. Using case analysis method of behavior safety “2-4” model, we analyze reasons of unsafe acts led to 66 classical coal and gas outburst accidents from the year of 2000 to 2011. It shows that proportion of unsafe acts of front-line staff is 37.30%, senior manager 36.99%, the supervisor 24.76%, and the group leader 5.64%. The highest frequency unsafe act for front-line staff is when they are working in coal and gas outburst area. Indirect causes are the lack of safety knowledge and the lack of safety awareness.
  • [1]
    郑权.煤与瓦斯突出孔洞形成机理及突出能量源的实验与理论研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2013.
    [2]
    杨森林.深部矿井不同采深煤与瓦斯突出实验与数值模拟研究[D].阜新:辽宁工程技术大学,2013.
    [3]
    马跃,傅贵,杨卓明.矿工不安全行为分类及控制对策研究[J].煤矿安全,2014,45(9):235-237.
    [4]
    傅贵,殷文韬,董继业.行为安全“2-4”模型及其在煤矿安全管理中的应用[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(7):1123-1129.
    [5]
    孙成坤,傅贵,董继业,等.行为控制方法在煤矿企业中的应用研究[J].安全与环境工程,2014(4):25.
    [6]
    傅贵,陆柏,陈秀珍.基于行为科学的组织安全管理方案模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,15(9):21-27.
    [7]
    曹庆仁.管理者与员工在不安全行为控制认识上的差异研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(1):22-28.
    [8]
    秦臻.企业班组长安全领导力与员工安全行为关系研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2014.
    [9]
    季大奖.煤矿班组安全共享心智模式研究[D].阜新:辽宁工程技术大学,2012.
    [10]
    孙成坤,傅贵,董继业,等.行为控制方法在煤矿放炮事故预防中的应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(12):107-111.
  • Related Articles

    [1]RONG Tongrui, HOU Enke, XIA Bingbing. Research on prediction method of coal mining face gas outflow based on quadratic decomposition and BO-BiLSTM combination model[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2024, 55(5): 83-92. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.20222269
    [2]YANG Tao, XIE Ziqi, HU Jingyan, WANG Chen. Study on influencing factors of gas emission in mining face based on regression shapley value decomposition method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(11): 18-24. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2023.11.005
    [3]WU Bing, GUO Zhiguo, WANG Ziwei. Gas Emission Forecasting at Heading Face Based on ARIMA-GM Model[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(11): 152-155.
    [4]LIU Yanwei, XUE Wentao, LI Zhiqiang. Problems and Correction of Gas Emission Prediction Model in Mine Statistical Method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(5): 176-178,182.
    [5]HAN Yibo. Gas Emission Prediction Based on GA-ELM[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(4): 166-169.
    [6]DI Zhiqiang. Prediction Method of Gas Emission Based on Multi-source Information Fusion[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(8): 172-174,178.
    [7]XIAO Peng, LI Shu-gang, SONG Ying, LIN Hai-fei, PAN Hong-yu. Forecasting of Gas Emissions at Fully Mechanized Caving Face in Gassy Mine Based on Multi-variable Gray Model[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(10): 11-13.
    [8]CHEN Yan-ke, DAI Guang-long, LI Peng, REN Wei-bing. The Application of Equal-dimension New-information Model on Amount of Gas Emission[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(2): 121-124.
    [9]ZHANG Sheng-jun, ZHU Rui-jie, JIANG Chun-lu. Prediction Model for Gas Emission Quantity in Mining Face Based on Partial Least Squares Regression[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(2): 7-11.
    [10]WANG Ming, WANG Jian-Jun. Gas Emission Prediction Model of Stope Based on Random Forests[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(8): 182-185.

Catalog

    Article views (254) PDF downloads (0) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return