• Chinese Core Periodicals
  • Chinese Core Journals of Science and Technology
  • RCCSE Chinese Authoritative Academic Journals
QIU Sheng-hua, YANG Zhi-xi, LIU Guang-zhao, CAO Fu-hui, LIU Meng, ZHU Yan-jiang. Simulation Study on the Height of Water Flowing Fractured Zone After Coal Seam Mining[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(6): 34-36.
Citation: QIU Sheng-hua, YANG Zhi-xi, LIU Guang-zhao, CAO Fu-hui, LIU Meng, ZHU Yan-jiang. Simulation Study on the Height of Water Flowing Fractured Zone After Coal Seam Mining[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(6): 34-36.

Simulation Study on the Height of Water Flowing Fractured Zone After Coal Seam Mining

More Information
  • Published Date: June 19, 2013
  • For the safe mining of coal resource, depending on the designing mining height, a mine applied the two methods of empirical formula and numerical simulation to study the height of water flowing fractured zone of 16# and 17# coal seams which are exploited alone. The result shows that these two values are 36.1 m and 29.7 m according to the empirical formula, and 37.1 m and 26.9 m according to computer simulation. Depending on the designing mining height, the height of water flowing fractured zone of 16# and 17# coal seams after mining is 41.7 m according to computer simulation.
  • [1]
    何国清,杨伦.矿山开采沉陷学[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,1991.
    [2]
    唐春安, 于广明,刘红元,等.采动岩体破裂与岩层移动数值实验[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,2003.
    [3]
    唐春安, 王述红,傅宇方.岩石破裂过程数值实验[M].北京: 科学出版社,2003.
    [4]
    刘红元, 刘建新, 唐春安.采动影响下覆岩垮落过程的数值模拟[J].岩土工程学报, 2001,23(3):201-204.
    [5]
    王双美.导水裂隙带高度研究方法概述[J].江苏地质,2006,30(1):64-66.
    [6]
    刘保卫.采场上覆岩层“三带”高度与岩性的关系[J].煤炭技术,2009,28(8):56-57.
    [7]
    栾元重.近距煤层开采覆岩导水裂隙带高度观测研究[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2010,27(1):139-142.
  • Related Articles

    [1]GAO Tong, LIU Yun, HUANG He, SUN Jianlin. Study on Optimization of Coal Mine Safety Risk Evaluation Index System[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(12): 296-300.
    [2]JIANG Yang. CW-FCEM Evaluation Model of Rock Burst in Coal Mine Based on Group Decision Analytic Hierarchy Process and Factor Analysis[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(9): 187-191.
    [3]FANG Gang. Risk Evaluation of Roof Water Inflow (Inrush) and Prevention and Control Measures in Early Mining Areas of Balasu Coal Mine[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(12): 189-193,199.
    [4]PAN Guoying, QIN Yongtai, MA Yafen. Risk Evaluation of Coal Floor Water Inrush Based on Improved Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(9): 194-197.
    [5]CHEN Lijie, WANG Jishun, SUN Chao. Risk Management Countermeasures for Coal Mine Enterprise Based on Mine Safety Evaluation[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(12): 236-237,241.
    [6]SANG Zhibiao, SHEN Xia, CHUAI Xiaoming, PENG Kun, QIAN Hongwei, HE Shanfeng. Identification and Evaluation of Human Risk Factors in Coal Mines[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(9): 232-234.
    [7]ZHU Jing. Coal Mine Safety Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(4): 226-228.
    [8]WEI Da-Yong, WANG Fei, XU Jin-peng, XU Qing-qing. Risk Evaluation of Mine Water Inrush Based on the Fractal and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(8): 184-186.
    [9]SUN Ming, ZHENG Wen-xiang, LI Xu-ping, MA Kai. Influence Factors Analysis for Floor Water Bursting in Deep Coal Seam Mining Based on Analytic Hierachy Process[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(3): 183-186.
    [10]ZHANG Peng, DU Ze-sheng, LI Zhong-hui, MA Yan-kun, XUE Shi-peng, WEI Li-na. Sensitivity Analysis of Outburst Hazard Evaluation Index Based on Principal Component Analysis[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(4): 1-4.

Catalog

    Article views (876) PDF downloads (0) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return