• Chinese Core Periodicals
  • Chinese Core Journals of Science and Technology
  • RCCSE Chinese Authoritative Academic Journals
REN Wei, ZHAO Yao-jiang, FENG Zi-fang. Namerical Simulation of flow Field in Goof Based on FLUENT[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(6): 26-29.
Citation: REN Wei, ZHAO Yao-jiang, FENG Zi-fang. Namerical Simulation of flow Field in Goof Based on FLUENT[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(6): 26-29.

Namerical Simulation of flow Field in Goof Based on FLUENT

More Information
  • Published Date: June 19, 2013
  • The determination method of porous medium permeability in the goaf is studied by FLUENT numerical simulation, and the built three-dimensional model is verified through the introduction of ventilation resistance laws. The paper summarizes and analyzes the hulking coefficient of coal and rock collapsed from the x, y, z three directions respectively, and the three dimensional continuous distribution functions of the goaf permeability and porosity is determined. It takes the stope space as a porous zone that has a different permeability, and it builds a more accurate working face—the goaf continuous flow field mathematical model. The paper introduces the ventilation resistance characteristic, and compares the numerical simulation with the resistance coefficient model based on the field test differential pressures and air quantity. The study is based on the Shaqu Mine 14204 fully mechanized working face, and combines with the field test data to make the numerical simulation validation. The results show that the model is effective and reliable.
  • [1]
    钱鸣高,李鸿昌.采场上覆岩层活动规律及其对矿山压力的影响[J].煤炭学报,1982,7(2):1-12.
    [2]
    李树刚,石平五,钱鸣高.覆岩采动裂隙椭抛带动态分布特征研究[J].矿山压力与顶板管理,1999(3):44-46.
    [3]
    高建良,王海生.采空区渗透率分布对流场的影响[J].中国安全科学学报,2010(3):81-85.
    [4]
    张国枢,戴广龙.煤炭自然理论与防治实践[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2002:62-67.
    [5]
    丁厚成.张集矿综采面采空区瓦斯运移规律及抽放技术研究[D].北京:北京科技大学,2008.
    [6]
    王福军.计算流体动力学分析[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004.
  • Related Articles

    [1]GAO Tong, LIU Yun, HUANG He, SUN Jianlin. Study on Optimization of Coal Mine Safety Risk Evaluation Index System[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(12): 296-300.
    [2]JIANG Yang. CW-FCEM Evaluation Model of Rock Burst in Coal Mine Based on Group Decision Analytic Hierarchy Process and Factor Analysis[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(9): 187-191.
    [3]FANG Gang. Risk Evaluation of Roof Water Inflow (Inrush) and Prevention and Control Measures in Early Mining Areas of Balasu Coal Mine[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(12): 189-193,199.
    [4]PAN Guoying, QIN Yongtai, MA Yafen. Risk Evaluation of Coal Floor Water Inrush Based on Improved Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(9): 194-197.
    [5]CHEN Lijie, WANG Jishun, SUN Chao. Risk Management Countermeasures for Coal Mine Enterprise Based on Mine Safety Evaluation[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(12): 236-237,241.
    [6]SANG Zhibiao, SHEN Xia, CHUAI Xiaoming, PENG Kun, QIAN Hongwei, HE Shanfeng. Identification and Evaluation of Human Risk Factors in Coal Mines[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(9): 232-234.
    [7]ZHU Jing. Coal Mine Safety Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014, 45(4): 226-228.
    [8]WEI Da-Yong, WANG Fei, XU Jin-peng, XU Qing-qing. Risk Evaluation of Mine Water Inrush Based on the Fractal and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(8): 184-186.
    [9]SUN Ming, ZHENG Wen-xiang, LI Xu-ping, MA Kai. Influence Factors Analysis for Floor Water Bursting in Deep Coal Seam Mining Based on Analytic Hierachy Process[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2013, 44(3): 183-186.
    [10]ZHANG Peng, DU Ze-sheng, LI Zhong-hui, MA Yan-kun, XUE Shi-peng, WEI Li-na. Sensitivity Analysis of Outburst Hazard Evaluation Index Based on Principal Component Analysis[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(4): 1-4.

Catalog

    Article views (931) PDF downloads (0) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return