• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

下伏半采空型上层煤回采底板破坏特征与安全评价

周金艳, 赵立松, 卫皓皓, 高刚

周金艳, 赵立松, 卫皓皓, 高刚. 下伏半采空型上层煤回采底板破坏特征与安全评价[J]. 煤矿安全, 2023, 54(5): 127-132.
引用本文: 周金艳, 赵立松, 卫皓皓, 高刚. 下伏半采空型上层煤回采底板破坏特征与安全评价[J]. 煤矿安全, 2023, 54(5): 127-132.
ZHOU Jinyan, ZHAO Lisong, WEI Haohao, GAO Gang. Floor failure characteristics and safety evaluation of upper coal mining with underlying semi-goaf[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(5): 127-132.
Citation: ZHOU Jinyan, ZHAO Lisong, WEI Haohao, GAO Gang. Floor failure characteristics and safety evaluation of upper coal mining with underlying semi-goaf[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(5): 127-132.

下伏半采空型上层煤回采底板破坏特征与安全评价

Floor failure characteristics and safety evaluation of upper coal mining with underlying semi-goaf

  • 摘要: 在上层煤回采过程中,底板条件可能由于下层煤采空区而出现地层不完整的情况,底板条件的变化对上层煤回采中底板破坏影响明显。基于九龙矿15249S工作面微震监测数据,对底板事件活动性、顶底板比值、能量等多个参数进行统计、分析。研究结果表明:当下层煤为采空区时,上层煤回采时底板事件活动性强、扰动深度大;随着回采位置的前移以及下伏煤层条件的变化,底板与顶板事件频次之比发生较大变化,其变化规律与导水通道孕育形成等过程相吻合;下伏由采空区变为实体煤区域,底板破坏深度在0~5 m微震事件占比增长16.49%,5~20 m微震事件占比降低10.92%;上层煤层回采在接近下伏停采联络巷的过程中,大能量事件发育位置由浅部向深部延展。应用底板警戒层事件活动性、底板与顶板事件比值、距下伏煤层终采线距离、能量垂向密度参数构建底板安全评价体系,在下伏工作面停采位置前后为危险区,危险系数较高,可结合安全评价参数变化进行预警,加强水文地质观测。
    Abstract: In the process of upper coal mining, the floor condition may be incomplete because of the lower coal goaf, and the change of the floor condition has an obvious influence on the floor failure in the upper coal mining. Based on the micro-seismic monitoring data of 15249S working face in Jiulong Mine, the activity of floor events, the ratio of roof to floor, energy and other parameters are statistically analyzed. The results show that: when the lower coal is a gob, the activity of floor events is strong and the disturbance depth is large when the upper coal is mined. With the advance of mining location and the change of underlying coal seam conditions, the frequency ratio of floor and roof events changes greatly, and its change rule is consistent with the formation of water channel. The proportion of micro-seismic events increased by 16.49% and decreased by 10.92% when the bottom floor failure depth was 0-5 m and 5-20 m respectively. In the process of overlying coal stoping approaching the underlying stoping contact roadway, the development location of large energy events extends from shallow to deep. The floor safety evaluation system is constructed by using the parameters of floor warning layer event activity, floor and roof event ratio, distance from the stoping line of the underlying coal seam and vertical energy density. The danger zone before and after the stoping position of the underlying working face is a high risk factor, which can be combined with the changes of safety evaluation parameters for early warning and strengthening hydro-geological observation.
  • [1] 李连崇, 姚成宇, 魏廷双, 等.淮南矿区A组煤开采工作面底板破坏带深度确定[J].煤矿安全, 2022, 53(1): 212-218.

    LI Lianchong, YAO Chengyu, WEI Tingshuang, et al. Depth determination of floor crack zone in coal mining face of group A in Huainan minging area[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2022, 53(1): 212-218.

    [2] 张玉军, 张风达, 张志巍, 等.采动煤层底板层次性破坏特征全空间多参量协同监测[J].煤炭科学技术, 2022, 50(2): 86-94.

    ZHANG Yujun, ZHANG Fengda, ZHANG Zhiwei, et al. Full-space multi-parameter cooperative monitoring of failure hierarchy characteristics of mining coal seam floor[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2022, 50(2): 86-94.

    [3] 张志巍, 张玉军, 张风达.采动与隐伏断层双重作用下底板破坏特征[J].煤矿安全, 2021, 52(1): 194-199.

    ZHANG Zhiwei, ZHANG Yujun, ZHANG Fengda. Characteristics of floor failure under the double action of mining and hidden faults[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2021, 52(1): 194-199.

    [4] 段李宏, 张金陵.城郊煤矿二水平煤层底板突水危险性综合评价研究[J].煤炭工程, 2021, 53(1): 128-132.

    DUAN Lihong, ZHANG Jinling. Comprehensive risk assessment of water inrush from coal seam floor for No.2 mining level in Chengjiao Coal Mine[J]. Coal Engineering, 2021, 53(1): 128-132.

    [5] 付翔, 杨勇, 史文豹.采后底板破坏深度探测与数值模拟研究[J].建井技术, 2022, 43(1): 30-34.

    FU Xiang, YANG Yong, SHI Wenbao. Study on floor failure depth after mining by geophysical prospecting and numerical simulation[J]. Mine Construction Technology, 2022, 43(1): 30-34.

    [6] 苗葳, 许延春, 阚雪冬, 等.大水矿区底板采动“两带”实测方法研究[J].煤炭技术, 2022, 41(3): 116-119.

    MIAO Wei, XU Yanchun, KAN Xuedong, et al. Research on measurement of mining effect on floor “two zones” in abundant underground water mining area[J]. Coal Technology, 2022, 41(3): 116-119.

    [7] 王进尚.煤层底板破坏与递进导升协同突水致灾机理研究[D].淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2020.
    [8] 丁湘, 周新河, 闫鑫, 等.深埋近距离煤层开采底板破坏深度确定方法研究与应用[J].中国煤炭, 2022, 48(11): 27-33.

    DING Xiang, ZHOU Xinhe, YAN Xin, et al. Research and application of determination method of floor failure depth in deep-buried short-distance coal seam mining[J]. China Coal, 2022, 48(11): 27-33.

    [9] 胡彦博.深部开采底板破裂分布动态演化规律及突水危险性评价[D].徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2020.
    [10] 周金艳, 陈为民, 赵立松.煤层底板导水通道微震信号辨识特征[J].煤炭技术, 2022, 41(12): 128-134.

    ZHOU Jinyan, CHEN Weimin, ZHAO Lisong. Identification characteristics of microseismic signal of water channel in coal floor[J]. Coal Technology, 2022, 41(12): 128-134.

    [11] 周金艳, 桂二国, 扈勇亮.不等长工作面微震响应特征分析[J].煤炭与化工, 2022, 45(4): 43-48.

    ZHOU Jinyan, GUI Erguo, HU Yongliang. Research of microseismic response characteristics of unequal length working face[J]. Coal and Chemical Industry, 2022, 45(4): 43-48.

  • 期刊类型引用(1)

    1. 高刚. 带压开采工作面构造导水性微震监测研究. 煤炭与化工. 2024(09): 51-58 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(0)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  30
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  22
  • 被引次数: 1
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2023-05-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回