• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

行为经济学视角下的矿工故意违章行为决策仿真研究

祁丽霞, 陈光浩

祁丽霞, 陈光浩. 行为经济学视角下的矿工故意违章行为决策仿真研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2020, 51(2): 239-243.
引用本文: 祁丽霞, 陈光浩. 行为经济学视角下的矿工故意违章行为决策仿真研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2020, 51(2): 239-243.
QI Lixia, CHEN Guanghao. Simulation Research on Deliberate Violation Behavior Decision-making of Miners from the Perspective of Behavioral Economics[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(2): 239-243.
Citation: QI Lixia, CHEN Guanghao. Simulation Research on Deliberate Violation Behavior Decision-making of Miners from the Perspective of Behavioral Economics[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(2): 239-243.

行为经济学视角下的矿工故意违章行为决策仿真研究

Simulation Research on Deliberate Violation Behavior Decision-making of Miners from the Perspective of Behavioral Economics

  • 摘要: 根据行为经济学相关理论,从个体偏好、自信水平、工作意志力、违章示范等几个角度对矿工井下作业过程中故意违章决策影响因素进行分析,并构建了矿工故意违章决策系统动力学模型,运用vensimPLE软件仿真分析各因素对矿工故意违章决策的动态影响。结果表明,安全监管对矿工自信水平影响效果显著;安全宣传和安全教育分别对矿工偏好和意志力的提升具有长期效果;安全监管对矿工违章倾向的即时作用效果显著,安全教育作用的发挥则需要一定的时间积累。
    Abstract: According to the relevant theories of behavioral economics, this paper analyzes the influence factors of deliberate violation decision-making in the underground operation of miners from the perspectives of the individual preference, self-confidence level, work willpower and violation demonstration, and establishes a dynamic model of the intentional violation decision-making system. The vensim PLE software is used to simulate the dynamic influence of various factors on the deliberate violation decision of miners. The results show that the safety supervision has a significant effect on the confidence level of miners; the safety propaganda and safety education have long-term effects on the improvement of preferences and willpower of miners; the safety supervision has a significant effect on the immediate effect for violation tendency, and the role of safety education needs to be played after a certain amount of time.
  • [1] 刘毅,樊劭.发达国家煤矿安全发展历史及经验分析[J].中国煤炭,2018,44(10):174-181.
    [2] 陈红,祁慧,谭慧.基于特征源与环境特征的中国煤矿重大事故研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2005,15(9):33-38.
    [3] 陈红,祁慧,汪鸥,等.中国煤矿重大事故中故意违章行为影响因素结构方程模型研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007(8):127-136.
    [4] 李乃文,马跃,牛莉霞.基于计划行为理论的矿工故意违章行为意向研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(10):3-9.
    [5] 卢文倩,吕永卫.基于SEM的诱发矿工故意违章行为因素实证分析[J].中国矿业,2017,26(5):35-39.
    [6] 陈春霞.行为经济学和行为决策分析:一个综述[J].经济问题探索,2008(1):124-128.
    [7] 姜涛.偏好结构、信念特征与个体决策模型—基于行为经济学范式的研究综述[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2013(2):11-18.
    [8] George E Loewenstein, Leigh Thompson, Max H Bazerman. Social Utility and Decision Making in Interpersonal Contexts[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 57(3): 223-245.
    [9] Colin F Camerer, Ernst Fehr. When Does “Economic Man” Dominate Social Behavior[J]. Science, 2006, 311(6): 47-52.
    [10] 王国宏,戴烽,刘强.农民工学习力的代际变迁[J].教育与职业,2016(17):117-120.
    [11] 董志勇.行为经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
    [12] 娄振山,蔡杨,佟洋.官兵意志力与理性的影响因素研究[J].中国社会医学杂志,2015,32(6):457-459.
    [13] Frese M, Kring W, Soose A, et al. Personal Initiative at Work: Differences between East and West Germany[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(1):37-63.
    [14] Frese M, Fay D. Personal Initiative: An Active Perform-ance Concept for Work in the 21st Century[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2001, 23(1):133-187.
    [15] Ola Svenson. Are We All Less Risky and More Skillful than Our Fellow Drivers[J]. Acta Psychologica, 1981, 47(2): 143-148.
    [16] Buehler R, Dale Griffin, M Ross. Exploring the “Planning Fallacy”: Why People Underestimate Their Task Completion Times[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 67(3): 366-381.
    [17] Quiarnzade A, Huillier J L. Herding by attribution of privileged information[J]. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2009, 22(1): 1-19.
    [18] 王丹,沈玉志.矿工违章行为分类及控制模式研究[J]. 煤矿安全,2010,41(8):151-153.
  • 期刊类型引用(2)

    1. 李静,冒香凝,吴悠,张江石. 托管视角下矿工违章行为的动态演化博弈分析. 煤炭经济研究. 2024(11): 159-165 . 百度学术
    2. 吴伟东,钟明茜,黄鹏,姚灿,陈欣. 基于系统动力学的高校学生公寓安全管理水平研究. 科技促进发展. 2021(03): 572-580 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  74
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 3
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2020-02-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回