突出煤体视密度测定技术研究
Study on Measuring Technology for Apparent Density of Outburst Coal
-
摘要: 为解决突出煤体由于粒径过小导致其视密度测定结果不准确的问题,通过理论分析煤样粒径与视密度之间的关系,并运用自主研制的视密度测定装置,选取全国各地9个不同变质程度的煤样,提出了模拟煤层法测定突出煤体视密度的新方法。结果表明:很小范围内煤体视密度随煤体粒径的增加而减小后趋于常数;随着煤体变质程度增大其视密度呈现先变大后变小的变化规律,这和煤体变质程度与微孔体积、孔隙度、吸附能力变化规律相吻合;每个煤样在相同的水分、粒径、成型压力和围岩压力下对其视密度测定2次,对测定结果进行误差分析,分析发现不同煤样视密度测定误差均小于0.5%,不同煤样之间所得的视密度误差最大为0.33%。Abstract: In order to solve the problem that the apparent density measurement result of the coal body is inaccurate due to its small particle size, the feasibility of the coal seam apparent density measurement by simulating coal seam method is researched by theoretical analysis of the relationship between the coal sample particle size and the apparent density. Using the self-developed visual density measuring device, nine coal samples with different metamorphic degrees from different parts of the country were selected for experimental study. The results show that: in a very small range, the apparent density of coal samples increases with the decrease of the particle size of coal samples. When the particle size of coal samples is large enough, the apparent density of coal samples will tend to nearly constant value. With the increase of coal metamorphism, the apparent density of coal increases first and then decreases, which is same to the change rule of coal metamorphism degree and coal micropore volume, porosity and coal adsorption capacity. For each coal sample measured twice under the same moisture content, particle size, molding pressure and surrounding rock pressure, the analysis found that the apparent density measurement error is less than 0.5%; the error difference of the apparent density obtained is no more than 0.33%.
-
-
[1] 杜振宇,薛俊华,任波,等.基于层次-可拓的煤与瓦斯突出预警研究[J].煤矿安全,2018,49(12):169-172. [2] 蒋承林,石必明,杨胜强,等.矿井瓦斯灾害防治与利用[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2013. [3] 俞启香,程远平.矿井瓦斯防治[M].徐州:中国矿业大学,2012. [4] 谢雄刚.石门揭煤过程煤与瓦斯突出的注液冻结防治理论及技术研究[D].长沙:中南大学, 2010. [5] 叶青,冯涛,林柏泉,等.石门揭煤过程中煤与瓦斯延时突出及防治技术研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2008(9):167-171. [6] 蒋承林,俞启香. 煤与瓦斯突出的球壳失稳机理及防治技术[M]. 徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,1998. [7] 张淑娟,李树峰.检测石子表观密度和吸水率的新方法-倒称法[J].铁道建筑技术,1999(4):51-53. [8] HE HUANG, KEYU WANG.Density measurements of Argonne premium coal samples[J]. Energy & Fuels, 1995(9): 20-24. [9] GB/T 6949—2010煤的视相对密度测定方法[S]. [10] 李磊.突出煤表观密度测定技术研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2008. [11] 华安增.矿山岩石力学基础[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1980. [12] 陈结,潘孝康,姜德义,等.三轴应力下软煤和硬煤对不同气体的吸附变形特性[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(S1):149-157. [13] 田忠斌,王红冬,金法礼,等.我国气、肥煤储层煤层气资源开发潜力评价[J].煤炭科学技术,2017,45(2):95-101. [14] 张凯,汤达祯,陶树,等.不同变质程度煤吸附能力影响因素研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2017,45(5):192-197. [15] 周世宁,林柏泉.煤层瓦斯赋存与流动理论[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1997. [16] 李海青.浅析煤炭化验误差与处理[J].煤矿现代化, 2017(3):129-130. -
期刊类型引用(2)
1. 杨红红. 煤体变质程度对突出煤体吸附/解吸影响. 当代化工研究. 2022(13): 13-15 . 
百度学术
2. 蒋承林，俞启香，张超杰. 煤巷突出预测敏感指标及临界值的实验室测定方法及应用. 煤矿安全. 2021(10): 24-29 . 本站查看
其他类型引用(0)
计量
- 文章访问数: 88
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 2
下载:
