煤矿人因事故影响因素与组态路径分析
Analysis on influencing factors and configuration paths of human-caused accidents in coal mines
-
摘要: 为分析煤矿人因事故的影响因素及其组态路径，采用清晰集定性比较分析方法（csQCA），以25起典型人因事故案例为研究对象，选取人本因素、安全监管、组织管理、设备设施、复杂环境、安全规范和安全文化7个条件变量,探讨了煤矿人因事故形成的组态构型和多元路径。结果表明：煤矿人因事故的形成存在7条组态路径，并且在7条组态路径中各条件变量间呈现组合效用；不同条件变量对煤矿人因事故的影响力不同，其中安全规范、复杂环境、组织管理、安全监管4个因素对于煤矿人因事故的发生具有重要影响作用，组织管理因素尤为关键。最后根据研究结果,提出了预防煤矿人因事故的对策建议。Abstract: In order to analyze the various influencing factors and their configuration paths of human-caused accidents in coal mines, through adopting the clear set qualitative comparative analysis method（ｃｓＱＣＡ） and taking 25 typical human-caused accident cases as the research object, this paper selects seven conditional variables: human factors, safety supervision, organization and management, equipment and facilities, complex environment, safety norms and safety culture to discuss the group configuration and multiple paths of human-caused accidents in coal mines. The results show that there are seven configuration paths in the formation of human-caused accidents in coal mines, and the associative effect is shown among the conditional variables in the seven configuration paths. In addition, different conditional variables have different influence on human-caused accidents in coal mines. Among them, safety norms, complex environment, organization management and safety supervision impose important effect on the occurrence of human accidents, and the organization management is particularly critical. Finally, this paper proposes the measures and suggestions to prevent human-caused accidents in coal mines based on the research results.
-
-
[1] 张培森，李复兴，朱慧聪，等．2008—2020年煤矿事故统计分析及防范对策[J]．矿业安全与环保，2022，49（1）：128－134. ZHANG Peisen, LI Fuxing, ZHU Huicong, et al. Statistical analysis and prevention countermeasures of coal mine accidents from 2008 to 2020[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2022, 49（1）: 128-134.
[2] 张俊文，杨虹霞．2005—2019年我国煤矿重大及以上事故统计分析及安全生产对策研究[J]．煤矿安全，2021，52（12）：261－264. ZHANG Junwen, YANG Hongxia. Statistical analysis of major and above accidents in coal mines in China from 2005 to 2019 and study on counterm easures for safe production[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2021, 52（12）: 261-264.
[3] LENNE M G, SALMON P M, LIU C C, et al. A systems approach to accident causation in mining: An application of the HFACS method[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2012, 48: 111-117. [4] 牛国庆，闫思洁．改进的ＨＦＡＣＳ煤矿事故致因灰色关联分析[J]．煤炭工程，2016，48（5）：142－145. NIU Guoqing, YAN Sijie. Grey correlation analysis of coal mine accident triggering factor based on improved HFACS[J]. Coal Engineering, 2016, 48（5）: 142-145.
[5] 田水承，樊梦琰，韩旭，等．煤矿险兆事件风险评价指标及分级方法[J]．矿业安全与环保，2021，48（4）：123－127. TIAN Shuicheng, FAN Mengyan, HAN Xu, et al. Risk evaluation index and grading method of near-miss incidents in coal mine[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2021, 48（4）: 123-127.
[6] 林永明．基于层次话题模型的煤矿安全事故致因要素研究[J]．安全与环境学报，2018，18（2）：619－623. LIN Yongming. On the cause tracing of the coal mine safety accidents based on the hierarchical topic model[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2018, 18（2）: 619-623.
[7] 汪刘凯，孟祥瑞，何叶荣，等．基于ＣＡ－ＳＥＭ的煤矿安全事故风险因素结构模型[J]．中国安全生产科学技术，2015，11（12）：150－156. WANG Liukai, MENG Xiangrui, HE Yerong, et al. Structural model of risk factors for safety accidents in coal mine based on CA-SEM[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015, 11（12）: 150-156.
[8] 谢晓佳，李婷婷，郑义，等．组态视角下科技小院运行绩效研究—基于20个科技小院的定性比较分析[J]．科技管理研究，2022，42（3）：41－49. XIE Xiaojia, LI Tingting, ZHENG Yi, et al. Research on operation performance of science and technology backyards from the perspective of configuration: qualitative comparative analysis based on 20 science and technology backyards[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2022, 42（3）: 41-49.
[9] 杜运周，李佳馨，刘秋辰，等．复杂动态视角下的组态理论与ＱＣＡ方法：研究进展与未来方向[J]．管理世界，2021，37（3）：180-197. DU Yunzhou, LI Jiaxin, LIU Qiuchen, et al. Configurational theory and QCA method from a complex dynamic perspective: research progress and future directions[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37（3）: 180-197.
[10] 田水承，张利华，许永刚．基于三类危险源的瓦斯爆炸ＳD仿真[J]．煤矿安全，2012，43（7）：213－216. TIAN Shuicheng, ZHANG Lihua, XU Yonggang. Gas explosion SD simulation based on three classes of hazards theory[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43（7）: 213-216.
[11] 刘思琦，曾祥敏．知识类短视频关键构成要素及传播逻辑研究—基于Ｂ站知识类短视频的定性比较分析（ＱＣＡ）[J]．新闻界，2022（2）：30－39. LIU Siqi, ZENG Xiangmin. Research on key components and communication logic of knowledge-based short videos: a qualitative comparative analysis based on knowledge-based short videos in Bilibili[J]. Journalism and Mass Communication Monthly, 2022（2）: 30-39.
[12] 黄扬，李伟权，郭雄腾，等．事件属性、注意力与网络时代的政策议程设置—基于40起网络焦点事件的定性比较分析（ＱＣＡ）[J]．情报杂志，2019，38（2）：123－130. HUANG Yang, LI Weiquan, GUO Xiongteng, et al. Event properties，attention and policy agenda setting in the internet age: a qualitative comparative analysis based on 40 online focusing events[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2019, 38（2）: 123-130.
[13] 田水承，李红霞，王莉，等．从三类危险源理论看煤矿事故的频发[J]．中国安全科学学报，2007，17（1）：10－15. TIAN Shuicheng, LI Hongxiao, WANG Li, et al. Probe into the frequency of coalmine accidents based on the theory of three types of hazards[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2007, 17（1）: 10-15.
[14] 黄曙东，戴立操，张力．核电厂人因事故预防的定量化决策[J]．中国安全科学学报，2006，16（6）：46－49. HUANG Shudong, DAI Licao, ZHANG Li. Quantified decision-making for prevention of accident caused by human factor in nuclear power plant[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2006, 16（6）: 46-49.
[15] 田水承，钟铭．煤矿事故频发的组织人原因分析[J]．矿业安全与环保，2009，36（1）：84－85. TIAN Shuicheng, ZHONG Ming. Discussion on organizers' factors causing frequent occurrence of coalmine accidents[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2009, 36（1）: 84-85.
计量
- 文章访问数: 18
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 22
下载:
