常村井田煤层气井排采储层类型划分及意义
Classification of drainage and extraction reservoir types for coalbed methane wells in Changcun coalfield
-
摘要: 准确划分煤层气井的排采储层类型能为排采过程压力传播研究奠定基础。以常村井田的3#煤层为研究对象,分析并选取了排采过程中影响煤储层的导流能力强弱和围岩的补给能力大小的主要参数,提出了获取这些参数的方法,确定了临界值;根据这些参数将研究区划分为4种排采储层类型,通过现场煤层气井的产水、产气情况验证了理论的可靠性,并讨论了排采储层类型划分的意义。结果表明:研究区可划分为高导流弱补给储层、高导流强补给储层、低导流弱补给储层和低导流强补给储层;高导流弱补给储层最有利于降低煤储层压力,表现出产水量小、见套压时间短的特点;低导流强补给储层表现出产水量大、见套压时间长的特点。Abstract: Accurate classification of drainage and extraction reservoir types of coalbed methane wells can lay a foundation for the study of pressure propagation in drainage process. Taking 3# coal seam of Changcun Mine Field as the research object, the main parameters affecting the conductivity of coal reservoir and the recharge capacity of surrounding rock in the process of drainage and extraction are analyzed and selected. The method of obtaining these parameters is proposed, and the critical value is determined. The study area is divided into four types of drainage reservoirs. The water production and gas production of CBM wells in the field verify the reliability of the theory. The significance of classification of drainage and extraction reservoir types was discussed. The results show that the study area can be divided into high-conductivity weak supply reservoir, high-conductivity strong supply reservoir, low-conductivity weak supply reservoir and low-conductivity strong supply reservoir. Among them, the high conductivity and weak recharge reservoir is most conducive to reduce coal reservoir pressure, showing the characteristics of small water production and short casing pressure time. The low conductivity and strong recharge reservoir shows the characteristics of large water production and long casing pressure time.
-
-
[1] 张遂安,曹立虎,杜彩霞.煤层气井产气机理及排采控压控粉研究[J].煤炭学报,2014,39(9):1927-1931. ZHANG Suian, CAO Lihu, DU Caixia. Study on CBM production mechanism and control theory of bottom-hole pressure and coal fines during CBM well production[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(9): 1927-1931.
[2] 康永尚,秦绍锋,韩军,等.煤层气井排采动态典型指标分析方法体系[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(10):1825-1830. KANG Yongshang, QIN Shaofeng,HAN Jun,et al. Typical dynamic index analysis method system for drainage and production dynamic curves of CBM wells[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(10): 1825-1830.
[3] 汤达祯,杨曙光,唐淑玲,等.准噶尔盆地煤层气勘探开发与地质研究进展[J].煤炭学报,2021,46(8):2412-2425. TANG Dazhen, YANG Shuguang, TANG Shuling, et al. Advance on exploration-development and geological research of coalbed methane in the Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(8): 2412-2425.
[4] 刘小磊,吴财芳,秦勇,等.我国煤层气开发技术适应性及趋势分析[J].煤炭科学技术,2016,44(10):58 -64. LIU Xiaolei, WU Caifang, QIN Yong, et al. Analysis on suitability and tendency of China coalbed methane development technology[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2016, 44(10): 58-64.
[5] 秦勇,张政,白建平,等.沁水盆地南部煤层气井产出水源解析及合层排采可行性判识[J].煤炭学报,2014,39(9):1892-1898. QIN Yong, ZHANG Zheng, BAI Jianping, et al. Source apportionment of produced-water and feasibility discrimination of commingling CBM production from wells in Southern Qinshui Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(9): 1892-1898.
[6] 刘之的,赵靖舟,徐凤银,等.煤层气井排采水源分析及出水量预测—以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘韩城矿区为例[J].天然气工业,2014,34(8):61-67. LIU Zhidi, ZHAO Jingzhou, XU Fengyin, et al. Analysis on water sources in a CBM gas well and forecast of water yield quantity: A case study from the Hancheng Mine at the eastern edge of the Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(8): 61-67.
[7] 杨宇,田慧君,张昊,等.具有越流补给的含水煤层渗流模型求解与典型曲线[J].煤田地质与勘探,2017, 45(1):95-99. YANG Yu, TIAN Huijun, ZHANG Hao, et al. Solution and typical curves of seepage model of water-bearing coal seam with leakage recharge[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2017, 45(1): 95-99.
[8] 刘冰,张松航,唐书恒,等.无越流补给含水层对煤层气排采影响的数值模拟[J].煤田地质与勘探,2021, 49(2):43-53. LIU Bing, ZHANG Songhang, TANG Shuheng, et al. Numerical simulation of the influence of no-flow re-charge aquifer on CBM drainage[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2021, 49(2): 43-53.
[9] 胡秋嘉,毛崇昊,石斌,等.沁水盆地南部高煤阶煤层气井“变速排采-低恒套压”管控方法[J].煤炭学报,2019,44(6):1795-1803. HU Qiujia, MAO Chonghao, SHI Bin, et al. “Variable speed drainage-low casing pressure” control method of high rank CBM wells in South Qinshui Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2019, 44(6): 1795-1803.
[10] 贾奇锋,刘大锰,蔡益栋.煤层气开采井间干扰研究进展[J].煤炭学报,2020,45( S2):882-893. JIA Qifeng, LIU Dameng, CAI Yidong. Research prog-ress on wells interference in coalbed methane mining[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(S2): 882-893.
[11] SIBBIT A M, FAIVRE Q. The dual laterolog response in fractured rocks[R]. Dallas: SPWLA 26th Annual Logging Symposium, 1985. [12] 乌洪翠,邵才瑞,张福明.深部煤层气测井评价方法及其应用[J].煤田地质与勘探,2008,36(4):25-28. WU Hongcui, SHAO Cairui, ZHANG Fuming. Application of logging evaluation methods for coalbed methane resources at deep depth[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2008, 36(4): 25-28.
[13] 姚艳斌,王辉,杨延辉,等.煤层气储层可改造性评价—以郑庄区块为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2021, 49(1):119-129. YAO Yanbin, WANG Hui, YANG Yanhui, et al. Evaluation of the hydro-fracturing potential for coalbed methane reservoir: A case study of Zhengzhuang CBM field[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2021, 49(1): 119-129.
[14] 郭广山.柿庄南区块煤层气储层有利区综合评价研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2019,47(3):200-206. GUO Guangshan. Comprehensive evaluation study on favorable area of coalbed methane reservoir in southern Shizhuang Block[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2019, 47(3): 200-206.
[15] 郭红玉,苏现波,夏大平,等.煤储层渗透率与地质强度指标的关系研究及意义[J].煤炭学报,2010,35(8):1319-1322. GUO Hongyu, SU Xianbo, XIA Daping, et al. Relationship of the permeability and geological strength index(GSI) of coal reservoir and its significance[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2010, 35(8): 1319-1322.
[16] 吴财芳,张晓阳.煤层气井排采过程中渗透率动态变化研究进展[J].煤炭科学技术,2016,44(6):7-13. WU Caifang, ZHANG Xiaoyang. Study progress of permeability dynamic variation in drainage process of coalbed methane well[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2016, 44(6): 7-13.
[17] 倪小明,王延斌,韩文龙,等.煤层气开发地质单元划分与应用实践[J].煤炭学报,2020,45(7):2562-2574. NI Xiaoming, WANG Yanbin, HAN Wenlong, et al. Division and application of development geological units for coalbed methane[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(7): 2562-2574.
计量
- 文章访问数: 13
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 9