基于G1-DEMATEL-测度量化的煤矿应急救援协同能力评价模型
Evaluation model of coal mine emergency rescue collaborative ability based on G1-DEMATEL-measurement quantification
-
摘要: 为了提高多元主体参与的煤矿应急救援协同能力，构建了包含救援准备协同、指挥决策协同、生命救援协同、事故处置协同和救援保障协同5个一级指标和17个二级指标的评价指标体系，并提出了基于G1-DEMATEL-测度量化的应急救援协同能力评价模型，利用青海柴达尔煤矿事故验证模型。结果显示：应急救援协同能力处于“一般”水平，其中救援准备协同和救援保障协同能力处于“较好”的水平，指挥决策协同、生命救援协同和事故处置协同能力处于“一般”水平，与柴达尔煤矿事故救援实际情况相符合；由此表明，该评价模型不仅能够客观评价应急救援协同能力，还能够分析应急救援协同能力的薄弱环节，为应急救援协同能力建设提供决策支持。
-
关键词:
- 多元主体参与 /
- 煤矿应急救援 /
- 协同能力 /
- G1-DEMATEL /
- 评价模型
Abstract: In order to improve the coal mine emergency rescue coordination ability of multivariate main body participation, we built an evaluation index system consisting of 5 first-level indexes and 17 second-level indexes including rescue preparation coordination, command decision-making coordination, life rescue coordination, accident handling coordination and rescue support coordination, and proposed an evaluation model of emergency rescue coordination capacity based on G1-dematel-measure quantification. The model is verified by the accident of Qinghai Chaidar Coal Mine. The results show that the coordination ability of emergency rescue is at the “general” level, in which the coordination ability of rescue preparation and rescue support is at the “good” level, and the coordination ability of command and decision, life rescue and accident disposal is at the “general” level, which is consistent with the actual situation of the rescue in Chaidar Coal Mine. It shows that the evaluation model can not only objectively evaluate the emergency rescue coordination capacity, but also analyze the weak links of the emergency rescue coordination capacity, providing decision support for the emergency rescue coordination capacity construction. -
-
[1] 应急管理部．2020年全国煤矿发生事故123起、死亡228人[EB/OL].（2021－01－29）[2021-02-23].https://www.chinanews.com/gn/2021/01-29/9399572.shtml. [2] 朱莉．考虑效率和公平的跨区域协同应急救援路径选择[J]．控制与决策，2021，36（2）：483－490. ZHU Li. Routing optimization of cross-regional collaborative emergency rescue considering efficiency and fairness[J]. Control and Decision, 2021, 36（2）: 483-490.
[3] 朱敬聪，王飞，孟冬，等．基于ＩＳＭ－ＭＩＣＭＡＣ模型的工业园区应急协同影响因素研究[J]．消防科学与技术，2021，40（3）：442－445. ZHU Jingcong, WANG Fei, MENG Dong, et al. Research on influencing factors of industrial park emergency coordination based on ISM-MICMAC model[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40（3）: 442-445.
[4] 赵金龙，袁杰，赵荣华，等．危化品公路泄漏多主体应急协同调度系统[J]．中国安全科学学报，2020，30（8）：116－121. ZHAO Jinlong, YUAN Jie, ZHAO Ronghua, et al. Multi-agent emergency cooperative dispatching system for dangerous chemicals leakage on highways[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30（8）: 116-121.
[5] 哈肯．高等协同学[Ｍ].郭治安，译．北京：科学出版社，1989. [6] 孙丹．煤矿生产系统协同度评价及其关键子系统改善研究[D]．青岛：山东科技大学，2017：11. [7] 姜兰，吕忠，彭亚，等．基于组合权重－Ｆｕｚｚｙ的航空公司安全管理体系有效性评估[J]．安全与环境学报，2021，21（5）：2107－2113. JIANG Lan, LYU Zhong, PENG Ya, et al. Evaluation of safety management system effectiveness for airline companies based on combined weights and fuzzy method[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2021, 21（5）: 2107-2113.
[8] 李红霞，谢瑞瑞．基于ＡＨＰ和DＥＭＡＴＥＬ的员工模糊容忍度影响因素研究[J]．实验室研究与探索，2019， 38（7）：237－241. LI Hongxia, XIE Ruirui. Study on influence factors of miner’s tolerance of ambiguity based on AHP and DEMATEL[J]. Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 2019, 38（7）: 237-241.
[9] 阳雨平，黄丕森，陈国国．基于改进ＦＩＭ－未确知测度的尾矿库风险评价模型及应用[J]．安全与环境学报，2021，21（3）：996－1004. YANG Yuping, HUANG Pisen, CHEN Guoguo. Safety evaluation of tailings pond based on FIM-optimization unascertained measure[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2021, 21（3）: 996-1004.
[10] 阮超，张延军，李胡爽，等．基于改进熵权－未确知测度模型的城市污水深隧下穿既有铁路施工风险评价[J]．安全与环境工程，2021，28（6）：84－90. RUAN Chao, ZHANG Yanjun, LI Hushuang, et al. Construction risk assessment of urban wastewater deep-buried tunnels underpassing existing railway based on the improved entropy weight unascertained measurement model[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2021, 28（6）: 84-90.
计量
- 文章访问数: 35
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 14
下载:
