• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

低阶煤高温燃烧特性参数实验研究

杨梦单, 张雷林

杨梦单, 张雷林. 低阶煤高温燃烧特性参数实验研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2022, 53(7): 7-13.
引用本文: 杨梦单, 张雷林. 低阶煤高温燃烧特性参数实验研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2022, 53(7): 7-13.
YANG Mengdan, ZHANG Leilin. Experimental study on high temperature combustion characteristic parameters of low rank coal[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2022, 53(7): 7-13.
Citation: YANG Mengdan, ZHANG Leilin. Experimental study on high temperature combustion characteristic parameters of low rank coal[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2022, 53(7): 7-13.

低阶煤高温燃烧特性参数实验研究

Experimental study on high temperature combustion characteristic parameters of low rank coal

  • 摘要: 为了研究低阶煤在高温氧化过程中的燃烧特性,采用锥形量热仪测试了3种低阶煤样的点燃时间、热释放速率、总热释放量、质量损失速率、总质量损失量、CO释放量等参数,通过计算得到各煤样的燃烧效率,进而分析煤样的变质程度与燃烧特性参数之间的关系。结果表明:煤样的点燃时间随变质程度的加深而增加;煤样的热释放速率和总热释放量随变质程度的加深而增加,其热释放速率峰值也随之增加,分别为48.27、98.98、108.91 kW/m2;煤样的质量损失速率和总质量损失量随变质程度的加深而呈减少趋势,其质量损失速率峰值也随之减小,分别为0.052、0.049、0.044 g/s;煤样的CO释放量最大值随变质程度的加深而增大,在燃烧初期,长焰煤的CO释放量大于气煤和1/3焦煤,在燃烧后期,长焰煤的CO释放量小于气煤和1/3焦煤;煤样的变质程度越高,燃烧效率就越高。
    Abstract: In order to study the combustion characteristics of low-order coal in high temperature oxidation process, the cone calorimeter was used to test the ignition time, heat release rate, total heat release, mass loss rate, total mass loss, CO release and other parameters of three low-order metamorphic coal samples. The combustion efficiency of each coal sample was calculated, and then the relationship between the metamorphic degree of coal samples and combustion characteristic parameters was analyzed. The experimental results show that the ignition time of coal samples increase with the deepening of metamorphism degree, the heat release rate and total heat release amount of coal samples increase with the deepening of metamorphism degree, and their peak heat release rates also increase, which are 48.27, 98.98 and 108.91 kW/m2, respectively. The mass loss rate and total mass loss of coal samples decrease with the deepening of metamorphism degree, and the peak value of mass loss rate also decreases, which are 0.052, 0.049 and 0.044 g/s respectively. The maximum CO release amount of coal samples increase with the deepening of metamorphism degree. In the early stage of combustion, the CO release amount of long-flame coal is larger than that of gas coal and 1/3 coking coal, but in the late stage of combustion, the CO release amount of long-flame coal is smaller than that of gas coal and 1/3 coking coal. The higher the metamorphic degree of the coal sample is, the higher the combustion efficiency is.
  • [1] 刘峰,曹文君,张建明,等.我国煤炭工业科技创新进展及“十四五”发展方向[J].煤炭学报,2021,46(1):1-15.

    LIU Feng, CAO Wenjun, ZHANG Jianming, et al. Current technological innovation and development direction of the 14th Five-Year Plan period in China coal industry[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(1): 1.

    [2] 郭军,蔡国斌,金彦,等.煤自燃火灾防治技术研究进展及趋势[J].煤矿安全,2020,51(11):180-184.

    GUO Jun, CAI Guobin, JIN Yan, et al. Research progress and trend of coal spontaneous combustion fire prevention technology[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(11): 180-184.

    [3] 王德明,邵振鲁,朱云飞.煤矿热动力重大灾害中的几个科学问题[J].煤炭学报,2021,46(1):57-64.

    WANG Deming, SHAO Zhenlu, ZHU Yunfei. Several scientific issues on major thermodynamic disasters in coal mines[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(1): 57-64.

    [4] 梁运涛,罗海珠.中国煤矿火灾防治技术现状与趋势[J].煤炭学报,2008,33(2):126-130.

    LIANG Yuntao, LUO Haizhu. Current situation and development trend for coal mine fire prevention & extinguishing techniques in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2008, 33(2): 126-130.

    [5] 申宝宏,雷毅,郭玉辉.中国煤炭科学技术新进展[J].煤炭学报,2011,36(11):1779-1783.

    SHEN Baohong, LEI Yi, GUO Yuhui. Progress of coal science and technology in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2011, 36(11): 1779-1783.

    [6] 张嬿妮,邓军,杨华,等.不同变质程度煤微观结构特征的试验研究[J].安全与环境学报,2014,14(4):67.

    ZHANG Yanni, DENG Jun, YANG Hua,et al. Experimental study of the characteristic features of the microstructure of coal at different coal sorts[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2014, 14(4): 67-71.

    [7] 邓军,张敏,雷昌奎,等.不同变质程度煤自燃特性及低温氧化动力学分析[J].安全与环境学报,2021,21(1):94-100.

    DENG Jun, ZHANG Min, LEI Changkui, et al. Kinetic analysis of the low temperature spontaneous oxidation combustion of the coal seams due to the different metamorphism extents[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2021, 21(1): 94-100.

    [8] 邓军,赵婧昱,张嬿妮,等.不同变质程度煤二次氧化自燃的微观特性试验[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(5):1164-1172.

    DENG Jun, ZHAO Jingyu, ZHANG Yanni, et al. Micro-characteristics of spontaneous combustion of second oxidation with different rank coals[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(5): 1164-1172.

    [9] 周西华,白刚,聂荣山,等.不同变质程度煤自燃特征参数实验研究[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版),2018,37(1):37-42.

    ZHOU Xihua, BAI Gang, NIE Rongshan, et al. Experimental study on spontaneous combustion characteristic parameters of coal in different metamorphic grades[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University (Natural Science), 2018, 37(1): 37-42.

    [10] 白刚,周西华,孙宝铁,等.不同变质程度煤燃烧特性参数试验研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2016,26(9):56-61.

    BAI Gang, ZHOU Xihua, SUN Baotie, et al. Experimental research on combustion characteristic parameters of coal samples different in metamorphic degree[J]. Journal of China Safety Science, 2016, 26(9): 56-61.

    [11] 刘宇帅.不同变质程度煤自燃特性实验研究[J].煤矿安全,2019,50(2):10.

    LIU Yushuai. Experimental study on spontaneous combustion characteristics of different degrees of metamorphic coal[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(2): 10.

    [12] 李娜,刘全生,甄明,等.不同变质程度煤燃烧反应性及FTIR分析其热解过程结构变化[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2016,36(9):2760-2765.

    LI Na, LIU Quansheng, ZHEN Ming, et al. Coal combustion reactivity of different metamorphic degree and structure changes of FTIR analysis in pyrolysis process[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2016, 36(9): 2760-2765.

    [13] 高鹏永,石必明,张雷林,等.不同含水率煤的燃烧特性实验[J].工矿自动化,2021,47(7):120-124.

    GAO Pengyong, SHI Biming, ZHANG Leilin, et al. Combustion characteristics experiments of coal with different moisture content[J]. Industry and Mine Automation, 2021, 47(7): 120-124.

    [14] 王康,刘运传,孟祥艳,等.锥形量热仪测量材料热释放速率的影响因素分析[J].消防科学与技术,2018, 37(4):449-452.

    WANG Kang, LIU Yunchuan, MENG Xiangyan,et al. Analysis on the influence factors of heat release rate tested by cone calorimeter[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2018, 37(4): 449-452.

    [15] 贾廷贵,强倩,娄和壮,等.不同变质程度煤样氧化自燃热特性试验研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2021,31(10):62-67.

    JIA Tinggui, QIANG Qian, LOU Hezhuang, et al. Experimental study on thermal characteristics of coal samples with different metamorphism degree during spontaneous combustion[J]. Journal of China Safety Science, 2021, 31(10): 62-67.

    [16] 周西华,李昂,聂荣山,等.不同变质程度煤燃烧阶段链烃生成规律[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(7):1741.

    ZHOU Xihua, LI Ang, NIE Rongshan, et al. Chain hydrocarbons formation law of different metamorphic grade coals at combustion phase[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(7): 1741.

    [17] 付钧泽,姜红,孙振文.不同阻燃剂阻燃聚丙烯的火灾危险性分析[J].工程塑料应用,2021,49(8):105.

    FU Junze, JIANG Hong, SUN Zhenwen. Fire risk analysis of polypropylene materials with different flame retardants[J]. Engineering Plastics Application, 2021, 49(8): 105.

  • 期刊类型引用(12)

    1. 曹建波,王艳萍. 煤柱回收工作面支护方案及顶板控制效果分析. 能源与环保. 2024(04): 243-248+253 . 百度学术
    2. 石磊,武超,吕冬,卢卫永,王鹏,孙耀辉. 基于能量耗散理论的深部巷道围岩松动圈范围分析. 煤矿安全. 2024(10): 150-157 . 本站查看
    3. 钮长松. 薄煤层高瓦斯矿井近距离煤层开采沿空留巷技术研究应用. 煤炭技术. 2023(03): 69-73 . 百度学术
    4. 刘泽威,刘洋. 薄煤层高瓦斯工作面沿空留巷研究及效益分析. 煤炭技术. 2023(04): 78-82 . 百度学术
    5. 王大顺. 巷道围岩最大主偏应力及塑性区分布形态演化规律研究. 煤矿安全. 2023(08): 118-127 . 本站查看
    6. 李本奎,常立宗. 高应力扰动破坏区巷道围岩稳定性控制研究. 山西煤炭. 2023(03): 8-16 . 百度学术
    7. 单仁亮,吴景铜,刘帅,李赓照,鲍永生,刘锦荣. 特厚煤层沿顶巷道抗剪锚管索帮角控制技术研究. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(06): 1-10 . 百度学术
    8. 谢志红,常庆粮,孙志猛. 断层附近高应力巷道围岩变形机理及控制技术. 煤矿安全. 2022(04): 121-128 . 本站查看
    9. 李明,马玉琨,董秀磊,马明月,张玉柏. 深部软岩大断面硐室开挖与支护方式优化. 煤炭技术. 2022(08): 46-49 . 百度学术
    10. 王巍,张传宝. 千万吨矿井回采巷道锚杆支护技术优化. 煤炭科学技术. 2022(S1): 106-111 . 百度学术
    11. 邹剑. 基于FLAC~(3D)采动巷道围岩支护参数优化分析. 中国矿山工程. 2021(05): 49-52 . 百度学术
    12. 杨静. 深部构造发育区回采巷道支护技术研究. 山西冶金. 2021(05): 125-127+149 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(6)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  53
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  35
  • 被引次数: 18
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2022-07-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回