• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

近距离缓倾斜煤层群开采工作面自燃防治技术

陈庆丰

陈庆丰. 近距离缓倾斜煤层群开采工作面自燃防治技术[J]. 煤矿安全, 2021, 52(2): 78-82.
引用本文: 陈庆丰. 近距离缓倾斜煤层群开采工作面自燃防治技术[J]. 煤矿安全, 2021, 52(2): 78-82.
CHEN Qingfeng. Prevention and control technology of spontaneous combustion in mining face of closely inclined coal seam group[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2021, 52(2): 78-82.
Citation: CHEN Qingfeng. Prevention and control technology of spontaneous combustion in mining face of closely inclined coal seam group[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2021, 52(2): 78-82.

近距离缓倾斜煤层群开采工作面自燃防治技术

Prevention and control technology of spontaneous combustion in mining face of closely inclined coal seam group

  • 摘要: 以屯宝煤矿为例,分析了M9-10、M14、M15等自燃煤层布置的工作面在撤架期间出现自燃征兆的原因:各煤层工作面开采后,与上覆采空区形成复合采空区并与地表之间形成复杂的漏风通道;加之工作面布置设备多、支架吨位大,且受限于回撤工艺,支架拆解困难,导致工作面回撤周期大大延长;因此采空区破碎煤体蓄热条件充足,并超过煤层最短发火期,从而出现自燃征兆。为使工作面能顺利撤架,针对撤架期间采空区松散煤体的自燃特性,提出“全程监测、管风降氧、控制煤温、优化工艺”的防灭火思路,采取采空区保压控氧、注氮注浆联合减氧降温、高低位钻孔注浆靶向治理发热条带等综合防灭火技术措施,保障工作面长时间撤架工作下的安全。
    Abstract: Taking Tunbao Coal Mine as an example, the reasons for spontaneous combustion signs during working face layout of spontaneous coal seams such as M9-10, M14, M15 were analyzed: after the mining of each coal face, the complex goaf is formed with the overlying goaf and the complex air leakage passage is formed between it and the surface; in addition, the working face is equipped with equipment and the tonnage of the bracket is large, and it is limited by the withdrawal process, and the bracket disassembly is difficult, resulting in a greatly extended withdrawal period of the working face; therefore, the heat storage condition of broken coal body in goaf is sufficient, and it exceeds the shortest firing period of coal seam, thus spontaneous combustion signs appear. In order to allow the working face to be withdrawn smoothly, according to the spontaneous combustion characteristics of the loose coal in the goaf during the removal, the fire extinguishing ideas of “full monitoring, pipe wind oxygen reduction, coal temperature control, and optimized process” were proposed. Comprehensive fire-fighting technical measures, such as pressure maintaining and oxygen control in goaf, nitrogen injection grouting combined with oxygen reducing and cooling, and targeted treatment of heating strips by high and low position drilling grouting, are adopted to ensure the safety of the working face when it is removed from the pedestal for a long time.
  • [1] 邓军,李贝,王凯,等.我国煤火灾害防治技术研究现状及展望[J].煤炭科学技术,2016,44(10):1-7.

    DENG Jun, LI Bei, WANG Kai, et al. Research status and outlook on prevention and control technology of coal fire disaster in China[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2016, 44(10): 1-7.

    [2] 文虎,王文,陶维国,等.超长综采工作面撤架期间煤自燃预测及防控技术研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2020, 48(1):167-173.

    WEN Hu, WANG Wen, TAO Weiguo, et al. Study on coal spontaneous combustion prediction and prevention and control technology during the withdrawal of super long fully mechanized mining face[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2020, 48(1): 167-173.

    [3] 陈庆丰,吴玉海.长周期回撤工作面防灭火技术研究[J].煤矿安全,2018,49(1):93-96.

    CHEN Qingfeng, WU Yuhai. Practice of fire prevention and extinguishing technology in long period retirement face[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(1): 93-96.

    [4] 金永飞,郭军,邱吉龙,等.综放工作面停采撤架期间综合防灭火技术研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2014,42(2):38-40.

    JIN Yongfei, GUO Jun, QIU Jilong, et al. Study on comprehensive fire prevention technology of fully mechanized top coal caving face during the period of terminal mining and powered supports withdrawing[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2014, 42(2): 38-40.

    [5] 文虎,程斌,翟小伟,等.下分层采煤工作面回撤期间自然发火防治技术[J].煤炭科学技术,2014,42(4):54-56.

    WEN Hu, CHENG Bin, ZHAI Xiaowei, et al. Technology of spontaneous combustion prevention and control during withdrawing period in lower layered coal mining face[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2014, 42(4): 54-56.

    [6] 陈庆丰,宋双林,赵凯,等.综放工作面回撤期间火灾防治技术实践[J].煤矿安全,2016,47(11):87-91.

    CHEN Qingfeng, SONG Shuanglin, ZHAO Kai, et al. The practice of fire prevention technology for fully mechanized caving face during the period of withdrawal[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(11): 87-91.

    [7] 陈艾,侯树宏.易自燃煤层综放工作面回撤期间综合防灭火技术[J].煤炭科学技术,2012,40(9):45-47.

    CHEN Ai, HOU Shuhong. Comprehensive fire prevention and control technology for fully mechanized top coal caving mining face in easy spontaneous combustion seam during face equipment withdrawn period[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2012, 40 (9): 45-47.

    [8] 徐永亮,时国庆,王德明,等.条带工作面煤自燃综合防灭火技术[J].煤炭科学技术,2010,38(10):40.

    XU Yongliang, SHI Guoqing, WANG Deming, et al. Comprehensive fire prevention and control technology of coal spontaneous combustion in strip mining face[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2010, 38(10): 40.

    [9] 柏发松,方昌才,陈宿,等.综采工作面架间高位插管注浆防灭火应用研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2014,42(5):45-47.

    BAI Fasong, FANG Changcai, CHEN Su, et al. Study on application of grouting fire prevention and control with high level tube in goaf between hydraulic powered supports of fully mechanized coal mining face[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2014, 42(5): 45-47.

    [10] 任万兴,郭庆,左兵召,等.近距离易自燃煤层群工作面回撤期均压防灭火技术[J].煤炭科学技术,2016, 44(10):48-52.

    REN Wanxing, GUO Qing, ZUO Bingzhao, et al. Pressure balanced fire prevention and control technology during equipment withdrawing period of coal mining face in easy spontaneous combustion contiguous seams group[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2016, 44(10): 48-52.

  • 期刊类型引用(19)

    1. 马治青. 含水层上方煤层开采过程中覆岩移动及底板岩层损伤演化特征分析. 采矿技术. 2025(01): 1-5 . 百度学术
    2. 陈太勇,刘国磊,常笑笑,吴延成,马秋峰,郝喜庆,赵成博. 采场正断层损伤活化机理与特征. 煤矿安全. 2025(02): 126-136 . 本站查看
    3. 孙文斌,田殿金,马诚,薛彦超,杨灿,朱开鹏. 侧限条件下断层破碎岩体变形及渗流侵蚀特性. 煤田地质与勘探. 2025(01): 193-203 . 百度学术
    4. 王红梅,宁明诚,鲁海峰,周恒心. 断层影响下煤层开采突水风险流固耦合数值模拟研究. 煤炭技术. 2024(01): 180-184 . 百度学术
    5. 赵伟,刘洲,王琦,李文江. 陈四楼煤矿地面定向钻孔超前区域治理底板岩溶水害技术. 西安科技大学学报. 2024(01): 84-93 . 百度学术
    6. 朱登奎,张兴华,郁静静,谢彪,雷倩茹,王泉栋. 不同倾角断层对底板透水影响规律研究. 煤炭技术. 2024(03): 184-188 . 百度学术
    7. 杨超,姜淑印. PPGF-灰岩胶结面剪切力学特性试验研究. 金属矿山. 2024(04): 37-45 . 百度学术
    8. 杨晨,唐羽晗,孙远军. 伊犁一矿5号煤层1504E工作面底板水害分析与防治. 内蒙古煤炭经济. 2024(10): 39-41 . 百度学术
    9. 杨鹏. 煤层底板渐进破坏与渗流演化数值模拟研究. 晋控科学技术. 2024(04): 48-51 . 百度学术
    10. 李泽京,王勇,王一,王进,王婉璐,陈国峰. 基于层次分析法的某煤矿水文地质类型评价. 地下水. 2024(05): 24-26 . 百度学术
    11. 李萍,姜旭,段建华,丛琳. 基于微震监测的工作面底板破坏曲面提取方法. 煤炭工程. 2024(11): 140-148 . 百度学术
    12. 邢茂林. 煤层底板区域治理后断层突水原因及探讨. 煤矿安全. 2023(03): 204-211 . 本站查看
    13. 邢茂林. 桃园煤矿F_(28)断层突水原因及堵水技术. 煤炭技术. 2023(06): 156-160 . 百度学术
    14. 许延春,苗葳,宛志红,叶精灵,李磊,邢晁瑞. 底板加固改造工作面“双关键层”控水模型. 煤矿安全. 2023(05): 63-71 . 本站查看
    15. 孙文斌,杨辉,赵金海,薛延东,张晓波,刘倩慧. 断层突水灾变演化过程划分基础试验研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(07): 118-128 . 百度学术
    16. 宋团. 干河煤矿2-301工作面底板突水机理及治理技术研究. 煤炭与化工. 2023(09): 72-75 . 百度学术
    17. 杨峰,李明鑫,殷聪,江昱卓,张加齐. 充填开采底板隔水层损伤破坏特征及稳定性控制. 煤炭技术. 2023(11): 23-29 . 百度学术
    18. 林征,王来斌,刘梦琪. 基于GIS与熵值法的煤层底板突水危险性评价. 河南科技. 2023(23): 66-69 . 百度学术
    19. 刘倩,许光泉,石怡煊,刘晓娟,徐立佳,何文乔. 采区岩溶水文地质条件综合分析及疏放性评价. 宿州学院学报. 2023(12): 44-49 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(6)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  23
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 25
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2021-02-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回