• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

不同方法表征的煤样应力敏感性对比研究

祝汉京, 石勇丽, 李林记, 张 苗

祝汉京, 石勇丽, 李林记, 张 苗. 不同方法表征的煤样应力敏感性对比研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2020, 51(12): 203-206,213.
引用本文: 祝汉京, 石勇丽, 李林记, 张 苗. 不同方法表征的煤样应力敏感性对比研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2020, 51(12): 203-206,213.
ZHU Hanjing, SHI Yongli, LI Linji, ZHANG Miao. Comparative Study of Coal Sample Stress Sensitivity Characterized by Different Methods[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(12): 203-206,213.
Citation: ZHU Hanjing, SHI Yongli, LI Linji, ZHANG Miao. Comparative Study of Coal Sample Stress Sensitivity Characterized by Different Methods[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(12): 203-206,213.

不同方法表征的煤样应力敏感性对比研究

Comparative Study of Coal Sample Stress Sensitivity Characterized by Different Methods

  • 摘要: 利用覆压核磁共振和渗透率技术,分别测试4组煤样的孔隙、裂隙的应力敏感性并进行综合分析。结果表明:基于覆压渗透率的压缩系数,随裂隙发育程度增加逐渐增大;孔隙、裂隙对应T2谱面积随应力增大呈指数下降,同一样品中裂隙应力敏感性大于渗流孔,吸附孔最低;相对于孔隙发育型样品,裂隙发育型吸附孔压缩系数随应力变化不甚明显;相同压力范围内,根据渗透率求得的压缩系数明显大于基于核磁共振测试求得的各范围压缩系数。
    Abstract: The stress sensitivity of pores and fractures in four groups of coal samples was measured and analyzed comprehensively by overburden nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR) and permeability. The results show that the compression coefficient based on the overburden permeability increases with the increase of fracture development, the corresponding T2 spectral area of pore and fracture decreases exponentially with the increase of stress, in the same sample, the stress sensitivity of fracture is greater than that of seepage pore, and the adsorption pore is the lowest; compared with the pore developed samples, the compression coefficient of the fissure developed adsorption pore did not change significantly with the stress; in the same pressure range, the compressibility obtained by permeability is obviously greater than that obtained by NMR.
  • [1] 陈金刚,秦勇,傅雪海.高煤级煤储层渗透率在煤层气排采中的动态变化数值模拟[J].中国矿业大学学报,2006(1):49-53.
    [2] 邓泽,康永尚,刘洪林,等.开发过程中煤储层渗透率动态变化特征[J].煤炭学报,2009,34(7):947-951.
    [3] 陈振宏,陈艳鹏,杨焦生,等.高煤阶煤层气储层动态渗透率特征及其对煤层气产量的影响[J].石油学报,2010,31(6):966-969.
    [4] 韩贝贝,秦勇,张政,等.基于压汞试验的煤可压缩性研究及压缩量校正[J].煤炭科学技术,2015,43(3):68-72.
    [5] 陈刚,秦勇,杨青,等.不同煤阶煤储层应力敏感性差异及其对煤层气产出的影响[J].煤炭学报,2014,39(3):504-509.
    [6] 刘俊刚.低场核磁共振技术在煤储层物性及流体作用规律分析中的应用[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2013.
    [7] 谢松彬,姚艳斌,陈基瑜,等.煤储层微小孔孔隙结构的低场核磁共振研究[J].煤炭学报,2015,40(S1):170-176.
    [8] 任会康,王安民,李昌峰,等.基于核磁共振技术的低阶煤储层孔隙特征研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2017,45(4):143-148.
    [9] 王肖.滇东老厂矿区煤层气地质特征及甜点区段优选[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2017.
    [10] 顾成亮.滇东黔西地区煤层气地质特征及远景评价[J].新疆石油地质,2002(2):106-110.
    [11] 吴财芳,刘小磊,张莎莎.滇东黔西多煤层地区煤层气“层次递阶”地质选区指标体系构建[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(6):1647-1653.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  25
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2020-12-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回