• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

过导水断层软岩巷道围岩稳定控制技术

王俊良

王俊良. 过导水断层软岩巷道围岩稳定控制技术[J]. 煤矿安全, 2020, 51(12): 85-92,99.
引用本文: 王俊良. 过导水断层软岩巷道围岩稳定控制技术[J]. 煤矿安全, 2020, 51(12): 85-92,99.
WANG Junliang. Surrounding Rock Stability Control Technology of Soft Rock Roadway Passing Water Conductive Faul[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(12): 85-92,99.
Citation: WANG Junliang. Surrounding Rock Stability Control Technology of Soft Rock Roadway Passing Water Conductive Faul[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(12): 85-92,99.

过导水断层软岩巷道围岩稳定控制技术

Surrounding Rock Stability Control Technology of Soft Rock Roadway Passing Water Conductive Faul

  • 摘要: 软岩巷道过导水断层破碎带时围岩往往面临着极大的失稳风险。基于此,考虑泥岩与粉砂岩浸水软化影响,采用FLAC3D对其通过断层时的应力、变形以及破坏特征展开数值模拟分析,并提出了“超前深孔帷幕注浆堵水+局部超前小导管注浆+锚带网索梁”联合支护技术,并对支护后的软岩巷道围岩变形破坏规律进行了对比研究。研究结果表明:当软岩巷道开挖接近导水断层破碎带时,由于顶板泥岩和粉砂岩受断层导水浸泡影响,其拱顶最大沉降以及侧墙水平位移增大约510%以及166%,而围岩塑性区破坏深度增大约0.5~4.6 m,进而导致部分支护结构失效;采用“超前深孔帷幕注浆堵水+局部超前小导管注浆+锚带网索梁”联合支护后,过断层软岩巷道围岩稳定性得到了有效控制,最终拱顶沉降以及侧墙位移均能控制在32 mm以内,而顶板以及两帮的塑性区破坏深度为1.7~2.0 m。
    Abstract: When soft rock roadway passes the water conductive fault fracture zone, the surrounding rock often faces grea tinstability risks. Based on this, FLAC3D is used to perform numerical simulation analysis on the stress, deformation and failure characteristics when it passes through the fault considering the softening effect of mudstone and siltstone by water. And the combined support technology of “advanced deep-hole curtain grouting for water blocking + local advanced small pipe grouting + anchor belt net and cable beam” is proposed, and the deformation and failure law ofsurrounding rock in the soft rock roadway after the support is comparatively studied. The research results show that: when the soft rock roadway is excavated close to the fracture zone of water conductive fault, the maximum settlement of the vault and the horizontal displacement of the side walls are about 510% and 166% higher than that before the immersion because the mudstone and siltstone of the coal roof are affected by the soaking of fault water. While the failure depth of the plastic zone of surrounding rock is about 0.5 m to 4.6 m larger, this leads to the part failure of supporting structure. After adopting the combined support of “advanced deep-hole curtain grouting for water blocking + local advanced small pipe grouting + anchor belt net and cable beam”, the stability for surrounding rock in soft rock roadway crossing the fault has been effectively controlled. And the final vault settlement and side wall displacement can be controlled within 32 mm, while the fracture depth of plastic zone is basically 1.7 m to 2.0 m in the roof and two sides.
  • [1] 陈建泉.断层破碎带切眼巷道顶板破坏特征研究[J].中州煤炭,2013(11):15-17.
    [2] 苏晓建,周世轩,张鹏,等.巷道过断层破碎带注浆防治水技术研究[J].中州煤炭,2013(8):7-9.
    [3] 刘勇.断层破碎带中巷道注浆加固设计与实践[J].煤矿开采,2012,17(6): 56-58.
    [4] 王振,题正义,常志峰.断层破碎带巷道的锚网喷架联合支护技术[J].有色金属(矿山部分),2012,64(2): 30-33.
    [5] 刘泉声,张伟,卢兴利.断层破碎带大断面巷道的安全监控与稳定性分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010, 29(10):1954-1962.
    [6] 郑全九,陈鹏,王永志.断层破碎带大断面巷道掘进与支护方式[J].煤矿开采,2004(1):65-66.
    [7] 刘传宝.过大断层、破碎带时巷道支护方式的选择[J].煤炭工程,2007(11):44-46.
    [8] 黄超.断层带破碎区巷道变形破坏规律与控制分析[J].煤矿安全,2012,43(5):170-173.
    [9] 王襄禹,柏建彪,李磊,等.近断层采动巷道变形破坏机制与控制技术研究[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2014,31(5):674-680.
    [10] 刘广超.高水压大断层时效性注浆加固技术研究[J].煤炭工程,2018,50(9):43-46.
    [11] 郝长胜,徐仁,尹旭,等.多断层构造应力下回采巷道围岩破坏特征及控制技术研究[J].煤炭技术,2019,38(7):18-21.
    [12] 张自政,李树清,于宪阳,等.深井穿断层回采巷道围岩变形机理与稳定控制对策[J].湖南科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020,35(1):10-16.
    [13] 郭修杰,赵仁乐,杨永杰.低强度泥化软岩巷道变形机理及支护技术[J].中国煤炭,2014,40(9):45-48.
    [14] 冯利民,黄玉东,张得现,等.高应力软岩巷道围岩变形机理及支护技术研究[J].煤炭工程,2014,46(9): 86-88.
    [15] 蒋康前,汪良海.深井穿断层破碎带软岩巷道围岩控制技术研究[J].煤炭工程,2014,46(3):42-44.
  • 期刊类型引用(1)

    1. 褚晓威. 多种工况螺纹钢锚杆应力应变特征研究. 煤炭工程. 2024(09): 136-145 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(3)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  11
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 4
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2020-12-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回