基于NVivo的矿工“三违”行为致因因素研究
Analysis of Causes of “Three-disobeying” of Coal Mine Employees Based on NVivo
-
摘要: 为研究煤矿员工“三违”行为的致因因素,对鄂尔多斯4所煤矿近期有“三违”行为的96名矿工进行了座谈调研。基于行为安全“2-4”模型并采用NVivo质性分析方法,对座谈资料进行分析,归纳出了包含不安全物态、不安全动作、个人习惯性行为、组织管理漏洞与安全文化缺失的5个树状节点及其24个子节点,并绘制出“三违”行为节点逻辑关系图,构建了煤矿员工“三违”行为具体致因链。通过分析“三违”行为树状节点编码数据,以编码参考点数对各树状节点的子节点进行频次统计,确定了致因链各部分频次最高的节点。研究表明,设备故障或工具破损(30.20%)与作业空间受限(23.96%)等子节点是影响不安全物态的重要因素;隐患排查治理不到位(61.46%)、未正确使用劳动保护用品(53.12%)与安全监察不到位(48.96%)等子节点是导致不安全动作发生的重要因素。Abstract: In order to study the causal factors of the “three-disobeying” of coal mine employees, a discussion was held with 96 miners who have recently committed “three-disobeying” in four coal mines in Ordos. Based on the behavior safety “2-4” model and using NVivo qualitative analysis method to analyze the discussion data, five tree nodes including unsafe states, unsafe actions, personal habits, organizational management loopholes, and lack of safety culture and their divergent 24 sub-nodes are summarized, and the logical relationship diagram of the “three-disobeying” behavior node is obtained, thus the specific cause chain of the “three-disobeying” of coal mine employees is established. By analyzing the coding data of the tree node of the “three-disobeying” behavior, and counting the sub-nodes of each tree node with the number of coded reference points, the node with the highest frequency in each part of the cause chain was determined. Research shows that sub-nodes such as equipment failure or tool damage(30.20%) and limited working space(23.96%) are important factors affecting unsafe states; inadequate hazard investigation and management(61.46%), improper use of labor protection products(53.12%), and inadequate safety monitoring (48.96%) are important factors leading to unsafe actions.
-
-
[1] 陈崇善.三违行为管理“十二分制”的探索实践[J].铜业工程,2018(2):1-5. [2] Gabriele Baldissone, Lorenzo Comberti,Serena Bosca, et al. The analysis and management of unsafe acts and unsafe conditions. Data collection and analysis[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 119: DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.10.006. [3] 杨勇.煤矿“三违”闭环防控模式与运行机制研究[J].煤炭工程,2016,48(5):146-148. [4] 张翼.煤矿“三违”闭环管理系统设计与实现[J].能源与环保,2017,39(4):218-222. [5] 郭红领,刘文平,张伟胜.集成BIM和PT的工人不安全行为预警系统研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2014, 24(4):104-109. [6] 张江石,赵群,张文越.安全管理实践与行为关系研究[J].安全与环境学报,2018,18(6):2279-2284. [7] 傅贵,李任.24Model第五版[EB/OL].(2017-10-31)[2019-12-03].Http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-603730-1083115.html. [8] 武彦光.基于HFACS的井喷事故致因因素NVivo分析[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2016. [9] 胡雅萍,刘千里,何菊香.决策失误防范中的情报介入影响因素研究—基于Nvivo11的质性分析[J].图书情报工作,2019,63(11):80-87. [10] 韩豫,梅强,刘素霞,等.建筑工人习惯性不安全行为形成过程及其影响因素[J].中国安全科学学报,2015,25(8):29-35. [11] 李乃文,张丽,牛莉霞.工作压力、安全注意力与不安全行为的影响机理模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(6):14-19. [12] 张景钢,王胜男,杨泽灏,等.基于布拉德利曲线与BBS干预的煤矿工人不安全行为分析[J].煤矿安全,2019,50(10):243-247. [13] 赵鹏飞,贺阿红.煤矿企业安全文化水平综合评价及改进策略[J].煤矿安全,2019,50(7):301-304. [14] 施波,王秉,吴超.企业安全文化认同机理及其影响因素[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(16):195-200. -
期刊类型引用(5)
1. 刘佳，栗继祖. 基于扎根理论的智能化煤矿矿工安全行为影响因素研究. 矿业研究与开发. 2023(03): 172-178 . 
百度学术
2. 徐晶晶. 基于灰色-熵权评估模型的煤矿不安全动作研究. 安全与健康. 2023(03): 60-64+69 . 百度学术
3. 付净，韩子鹏，刘虹，聂方超. 基于24Model的不安全动作内在致因研究. 安全与环境工程. 2022(01): 1-7 . 百度学术
4. 张江石，朱金梅，梁云飞，卜小平，申雪，张熙莹. 基于NVivo与集对分析的自然资源领域安全生产风险研究. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2022(01): 36-41 . 百度学术
5. 刘宇栋，孙世梅，郝璐瑶，郝欣宇. 建筑施工过程的中毒事故原因分析. 工业安全与环保. 2022(03): 49-52 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(0)
计量
- 文章访问数: 26
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 5
下载:
