赵庄区块松软低渗煤层煤层气低产机理研究
Low Production Mechanism of Coalbed Methane in Soft and Low Permeability Coal Seam of Zhaozhuang Block
-
摘要: 为探究沁水盆地南部赵庄区块松软低渗煤层煤层气井低产原因,以3号煤层为研究对象,采用液氮吸附、扫描电镜及X衍射等手段,对目的煤层的孔-裂隙发育特征、黏土矿物组成等进行分析,查明松软低渗储层的物性特征。通过水敏性伤害实验,进一步分析松软低渗储层煤层气低产的机理。研究结果表明:赵庄3号煤层多数为开放型孔,少量发育一端封闭的不透气型孔;孔隙发育较密,孔径以小、中孔为主;微裂隙较宽,延伸距离远,但密度低,孔-裂隙中矿物填充显著;黏土矿物成分为铵伊利石/蒙皂石间层,水敏性强。因此,赵庄3号煤层水力压裂后渗透率差,难以获得理想的增透效果。Abstract: In order to explore the cause of coalbed methane wells with low production in soft and low permeability coal seam of Zhaozhuang block in southern Qinshui Basin, taking No.3 coal seam as the research object. The pore-fracture development characteristic and clay mineral composition of the target coal seam and so on were analyzed by means of liquid nitrogen adsorption (BET), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD), to ascertain the physical characteristic of soft and low permeability reservoir. The mechanism of low production of CBM in soft and low permeability reservoir was further analyzed by water sensitive injury experiment. The results showed that Zhaozhuang No.3 coal seam was mostly open-type pores, a small number of closed and impermeable pores were developed. The No.3 coal had dense pore development and the pore size was mainly small and medium. The micro-fracture was wide and long extension distance, but the density was low. The mineral filling of pore and fracture was obvious. The clay mineral composition was ammonium-bearing illite-smectite interlayer with strong water sensitivity. Therefore, Zhaozhuang No.3 coal seam resulted in poor permeability after hydraulic fracturing, and was difficult to achieve ideal permeability enhancement effect.
-
-
[1] 赵阳升,杨栋,胡耀青,等.低渗透煤储层煤层气开采有效技术途径的研究[J].煤炭学报,2001,26(5):455-458. [2] 张小东,张硕,孙庆宇,等.基于AHP和模糊数学评价地质构造对煤层气产能的影响[J].煤炭学报,2017, 42(9):2385-2392. [3] 倪小明,杨艳辉,王延斌,等.沁中南断层不发育区多期构造运动作用下煤层气直井产水产气特征[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(4):921-930. [4] 季长江,郝海金,郝春生,等.赵庄区块地下水特征对煤层气开发的影响分析[J].煤炭科学技术,2018,46(6):149-154. [5] 郭广山,邢力仁,廖夏,等.基于储层“三品质”的煤层气产能主控地质因素分析[J].天然气地球科学,2018,29(8):1198-1204. [6] 赵欣,姜波,张尚锟,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘三区块煤层气井产能主控因素[J].石油学报,2017,38(11):1310-1319. [7] 贾宗文,刘书杰,耿亚楠,等.柿庄区块钻完井工程对煤层气井产能的影响研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2017, 45(12):182-188. [8] 王志荣,杨杰,陈玲霞,等.水力压裂条件下焦作矿区低渗煤层气试验井产能预测[J].煤田地质与勘探,2019,47(3):70-76. [9] 王勃,姚红星,王红娜,等.沁水盆地成庄区块煤层气成藏优势及富集高产主控地质因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2018,39(2):366-372. [10] 康永尚,孙良忠,张兵,等.中国煤储层渗透率主控因素和煤层气开发对策[J].地质论评,2017,63(5):1401-1418. [11] 许耀波,朱玉双,张培河.沁水盆地赵庄井田煤层气产出特征及其影响因素[J].天然气地球科学,2019, 30(1):119-125. [12] 降文萍,张群,姜在炳,等.构造煤孔隙结构对煤层气产气特征的影响[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(1):173-179. [13] 傅雪海,秦勇,李贵中,等.山西沁水盆地中、南部煤储层渗透率影响因素[J].地质力学学报,2001,7(1):45-52. [14] 范俊佳,琚宜文,侯泉林,等.不同变质变形煤储层孔隙特征与煤层气可采性[J].地学前缘,2010,17(5):325-335. [15] De Boer J, Van Den Heuvel A, Linsen B. Studies on pore systems in catalysts IV. The two causes of reversible hysteresis[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 1964, 3(3): 268-273. [16] 陈萍,唐修义.低温氮吸附法与煤中微孔隙特征的研究[J].煤炭学报,2001,26(5):552-556. [17] 于兴河.油气储层地质学基础[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009:298-299. -
期刊类型引用(4)
1. 任峻杉，张洲，邢丽茹，余婉莹，王鹏翔，邹强，杨正滔. 沁水盆地柿庄南区块煤层气井煤粉产出特征及控制机理研究. 煤矿安全. 2025(02): 67-74 . 
本站查看
2. 胡皓，孔鹏，刘广景，张亚飞，张晓飞，张锦涛，任峻杉，张洲. 煤层气井筒单相流阶段煤粉动态沉降规律. 煤矿安全. 2025(02): 81-86 . 本站查看
3. 李盈. “三调法”治理大庆沙河子组低产气井实例分析. 西部探矿工程. 2024(05): 42-44 . 百度学术
4. 白杨，王路一，李翔，窦幻君，罗平亚. 煤层气储层保护钻井液技术研究进展. 天然气工业. 2024(10): 182-194 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(0)
计量
- 文章访问数: 36
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 4
下载:
