• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

边坡稳定性计算理论与评价标准分析及发展趋势

孙世国, 于茜, 董彦飞

孙世国, 于茜, 董彦飞. 边坡稳定性计算理论与评价标准分析及发展趋势[J]. 煤矿安全, 2020, 51(6): 232-235.
引用本文: 孙世国, 于茜, 董彦飞. 边坡稳定性计算理论与评价标准分析及发展趋势[J]. 煤矿安全, 2020, 51(6): 232-235.
SUN Shiguo, YU Xi, DONG Yanfei. Analysis and Development Trend of Slope Stability Calculation Theory and Evaluation Criteria[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(6): 232-235.
Citation: SUN Shiguo, YU Xi, DONG Yanfei. Analysis and Development Trend of Slope Stability Calculation Theory and Evaluation Criteria[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(6): 232-235.

边坡稳定性计算理论与评价标准分析及发展趋势

Analysis and Development Trend of Slope Stability Calculation Theory and Evaluation Criteria

  • 摘要: 滑坡是我国最常见的地质灾害问题之一,众多学者经过近百年的研究,边坡稳定性计算理论与评价方法、安全防控措施及预测理论都有了质的飞跃和提升,相关的设计规范和施工标准都比较全面,边坡稳定性评价中的有关极限平衡计算理论、地理信息系统、数值模拟等方法日臻完善,全面系统地保障了各项大型工程建设的安全性;但由于受时代认识水平和负责地质构造及工程地质组件这种特殊材料而言,空间变异性的复杂程度不能完全解决目前的工程问题,因此就边坡稳定性评价的不足及今后发展方向及其应该解决的问题进行了分析和讨论。
    Abstract: Landslide is one of the most common geological hazards in China. After nearly one hundred years of research by many scholars, the theory of slope stability calculation and evaluation, safety prevention and control measures and prediction theory have made qualitative leap and improvements. The relevant design and construction codes are relatively comprehensive, and the relevant limit in slope stability evaluation is also relatively high. Balanced calculation theory, geographic information system, numerical simulation and other methods are improving day by day, which fully and systematically guarantee the safety of various large-scale construction projects. However, due to the level of knowledge of the times and the special material responsible for geological structures and engineering geological components, the complexity of spatial variability cannot completely solve the current work. In this paper, the shortcomings of slope stability evaluation, the future development direction and the problems to be solved are analyzed and discussed.
  • [1] 赵婷,王畅.边坡稳定性分析方法及工程应用研究进展[J].水利水电技术,2019,50(5):196-203.
    [2] 孙玉科,牟会宠,姚宝魁.边坡岩体稳定性分析[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1998.
    [3] 孙玉科,姚宝魁.我国岩质边坡变形破坏的主要地质模式[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1983,2(1):67-76.
    [4] 王国体.边坡稳定和滑坡分析应力状态方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
    [5] Schulz W H,Kean J W,Wang G H. Landslide movement in southwest Colorado triggered by atmospheric tides[J]. Nature Geoscience,2009,2:863-866.
    [6] Iverson R M,Reid M E,Iverson N R,et al. Acute sensitivity of landslide rates to initial soil porosity[J]. Sci ence,2000,290(5491):513-516.
    [7] 卢庭浩,刘祖德.高等土力学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2006.
    [8] Fellenius, W. Calculation of the stability of earth dams[M]. Proc. 2nd Congr. Large Dams,Washington,D. C. 4,1936: 445-462.
    [9] Janbu N. Soil stability computations [M] //Hirschfeid R C,Poulos S J. Embankment Dam Engineering. New York:John Wiley and Sons,1973:47-87.
    [10] Morgenstern N R,Price V E. The analysis of the stability of general slip surfaces[J]. Geotechnique,1965(15):79-93.
    [11] SARMA S K. Stability analysis of embankments and slope[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1979,105:1511-1524.
    [12] 刘汉东,贾金禄.岩土工程数值计算方法[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,1998.
    [13] 陈祖煜,弥宏亮,汪小刚.边坡稳定三维分析的极限平衡方法[J].岩土工程学报,2001,23(5):525-529.
    [14] 卢坤林,朱大勇,甘文宁,等.一种边坡稳定性分析的三维极限平衡法及应用[J].岩土工程学报,2013,35(12):2276-2282.
    [15] 唐高朋,李亮,赵炼恒,等.非线性破坏准则下边坡稳定性极限分析斜条分法[J].岩土力学,2015,36(7):2063-2072.
    [16] 沈华章,王水林,郭明伟,等.应变软化边坡渐进破坏及其稳定性初步研究[J].岩土力学,2016,37(1):175.
    [17] 张江伟,李小军,王晓明,等.土质边坡地震稳定性状态判定方法研究[J].岩土工程学报,2018,40(11):2096-2102.
    [18] 祝玉学.边坡可靠度分析[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,1993.
    [19] 夏丙铎.基于随机集理论的边坡稳定性分析方法[J]. 杭州电子科技大学学报,2009,29(6):87-90.
    [20] 蒋水华,李典庆,黎学优,等.锦屏一级水电站左岸坝肩边坡施工期高效三维可靠度分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(2):349-361.
    [21] 饶运章,张学焱,李雪珍,等.滑坡概率在边坡稳定性分析中的应用[J].灾害学,2016,31(1):7-10.
    [22] 孙世国,王超,宋维琦.基于GIS的三维边坡稳定性分析和危险滑面搜索[J].矿业研究与开发,2018,38(4):46-50.
    [23] 王旭春,蒋宇静,赵月,等.滑坡GIS可视化研究与应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(S2):2511.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  22
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2020-06-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回