中美煤矿事故调查报告的对比研究

    Comparative Study of Coal Mine Accident Investigation Reports in China and America

    • 摘要: 为找出中美煤矿事故调查报告的异同,给我国事故调查报告的编写提供具体建议,以中美两国正式发布的事故调查报告为研究基础,系统调研事故调查相关文献,对事故调查报告编写依据进行分析,并以中国金山沟煤矿“10·30”特别重大瓦斯爆炸事故和美国Upper Big Branch煤矿事故调查报告为例,从报告的结构内容和原因2方面进行具体分析。结果表明,中国应该出台统一的煤矿事故调查报告编写标准,实现事故调查报告标准化;美国事故调查报告不包含责任追究部分,原因分析部分所占篇幅多;美国事故调查进行原因分析时与中国所站角度不同,美国仅对事故单位进行分析,中国除此外还分析相关单位问题。

       

      Abstract: In order to find out the similarities and differences between Chinese and American coal mine accident investigation reports, and to provide specific suggestions for the compilation of China’s accident investigation reports, based on the officially released accident investigation reports of China and the United States, through systematic research on relevant documents of accident investigation, the basis for the preparation of accident investigation report was analyzed. Taking the “Oct. 30” major gas explosion accident in Jinshangou Coal Mine in China and the investigation report of Upper Big Branch Coal Mine in the United States as examples, the structural content and causes of the report were specifically analyzed. The results show that China should issue unified standards for the compilation of coal mine accident investigation reports and realize the standardization of accident investigation reports; the US accident investigation report does not include the accountability section, and the cause analysis section takes up a lot of space; the cause analysis of the accident investigation in the United States is different from that in China; the United States only analyzes the accident unit, while China also analyzes related unit problems.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回