• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

不同热破裂温度下煤岩的孔裂隙演化特征研究

李江华, 薛成洲, 韩强

李江华, 薛成洲, 韩强. 不同热破裂温度下煤岩的孔裂隙演化特征研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2020, 51(1): 22-25,29.
引用本文: 李江华, 薛成洲, 韩强. 不同热破裂温度下煤岩的孔裂隙演化特征研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2020, 51(1): 22-25,29.
LI Jianghua, XUE Chengzhou, HAN Qiang. Study on Fracture Evolution Characteristics of Coal Rock at Different Thermal Fracture Temperatures[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(1): 22-25,29.
Citation: LI Jianghua, XUE Chengzhou, HAN Qiang. Study on Fracture Evolution Characteristics of Coal Rock at Different Thermal Fracture Temperatures[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(1): 22-25,29.

不同热破裂温度下煤岩的孔裂隙演化特征研究

Study on Fracture Evolution Characteristics of Coal Rock at Different Thermal Fracture Temperatures

  • 摘要: 为了研究不同温度下煤页岩的细观孔隙结构,对经过20、100、300、500 ℃热破裂温度下的煤岩试样进行微米CT扫描试验,基于阈值分割算法得到了三维孔隙重构模型,并分析了孔隙率、孔喉尺寸参数和孔隙连通度的量化指标随温度变化的关系。结果表明,利用CT扫描技术获得煤岩的二维切片,经过重构可得到三维孔隙结构模型;表征孔隙含量的孔隙率与温度呈指数型函数关系;最大孔喉长度L和平均孔喉半径R随温度上升的增速呈先慢后快的特点;煤页岩的孔隙连通度随环境温度的升高保持初期迅速上升,在中期缓慢上升,到后期有所下降的变化。
    Abstract: To study the mesoscopic pore structure of coal shale rock under different temperatures, Micron CT scanning test was carried out on coal and rock samples at thermal fracture temperatures of 20, 100, 300 and 500 ℃. Based on the threshold segmentation algorithm, the three-dimensional pore reconstruction model is obtained, and the relationship between the pore ratio, pore throat size parameters and the quantitative index of pore connectivity with temperature is analyzed. The results show that the two-dimensional sections of coal and rock are obtained by CT scanning technology, and the three-dimensional pore structure model can be obtained by reconstruction. The relationship between porosity and temperature was exponential. The maximum pore throat length L and average pore throat radius R increase slowly and then rapidly with the increase of temperature. The pore connectivity of coal shale increased rapidly in the initial stage with the increase of ambient temperature, slowly increased in the middle stage, and decreased in the later stage.
  • [1] 王金波,黄耀辉,鞠杨,等.基于三维重构模型的孔隙岩石气体渗流的LBM模拟[J].煤炭工程,2014,46(5):77-80.
    [2] WANG Weishu, LIAO Yihan, LIU Jun, et al.Numerical Simulation and Optimization of Staged Combustion and NOx Release Characteristics in Precalciner[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2019, 28(5): 1024-1034.
    [3] 张天军,许鸿杰,李树刚,等.温度对煤吸附性能的影响[J].煤炭学报,2009,34(6):802-805.
    [4] 杨涛.超临界CO2抽提对煤的改性实验研究[D].太原:太原理工大学,2010.
    [5] Fenghai Li, Bing Yu, Hongli Fan, et al. Investigation on regulation mechanism of red mud on the ash fusion characteristics of high ash-fusion-temperature coal[J]. Fuel, 2019, 25(7): 1-10.
    [6] 王司建,李志强.构造煤多尺度孔隙中瓦斯扩散的动扩散系数新模型[J].煤矿安全,2015,46(5):16-19.
    [7] 周声才,李栋,张凤舞,等.煤层瓦斯抽采爆破卸压的钻孔布置优化分析及应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(4):807-813.
    [8] 刘玉龙,汤达祯,许浩,等.基于X-CT技术不同煤岩类型煤储层非均质性表征[J].煤炭科学技术,2017, 45(3):141-146.
    [9] Geet M V, Swennen R. Quantitative 3D‐fracture analysis by means of microfocus X Ray Computer Tomography(μCT): An example from coal[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2001, 28(17): 3333-3336.
    [10] 朱华银,安来志,焦春艳.恒速与恒压压汞差异及其在储层评价中的应用[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(7):1316-1322.
    [11] Thomas R Elliot, Richard J Heck. A comparison of optical and X-ray CT technique for void analysis in soil thin section [J]. Geoderma, 2007, 141(1): 801.
    [12] 韩强,屈展,叶正寅.页岩多尺度力学特性研究现状[J].应用力学学报,2018,35(3):564-570.
    [13] 贾小宝,牛海萍,刘鸿福,等.基于微焦点显微CT技术的不同煤体结构煤的孔裂隙定量表征[J].煤矿安全,2018,49(11):24-28.
  • 期刊类型引用(3)

    1. 张琨,张忍杰,任建喜,刘政,宋嘉炜. 冲击荷载作用下煤岩力学特性研究及能量演化特征. 煤炭技术. 2024(02): 1-5 . 百度学术
    2. 任智敏,吕梦蛟,王神虎,王禹,张广太. 大断面六边形巷道周边应力分布及其支架设计. 采矿与岩层控制工程学报. 2023(06): 28-42 . 百度学术
    3. 赵凌云,魏元龙,刘伟,张雄. 汪家寨煤岩各向异性的力学特性研究. 地下空间与工程学报. 2022(S2): 603-610 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(5)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  90
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 8
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2020-01-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回