• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

煤体渗透率随酸化时间和压力及温度的变化规律

李紫竹

李紫竹. 煤体渗透率随酸化时间和压力及温度的变化规律[J]. 煤矿安全, 2019, 50(12): 36-40.
引用本文: 李紫竹. 煤体渗透率随酸化时间和压力及温度的变化规律[J]. 煤矿安全, 2019, 50(12): 36-40.
LI Zizhu. Change Laws of Coal Permeability with Acidification Time, Pressure and Temperature[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(12): 36-40.
Citation: LI Zizhu. Change Laws of Coal Permeability with Acidification Time, Pressure and Temperature[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(12): 36-40.

煤体渗透率随酸化时间和压力及温度的变化规律

Change Laws of Coal Permeability with Acidification Time, Pressure and Temperature

  • 摘要: 通过对3种不同煤样酸化前后的渗透率测试,分析每种煤样渗透率的变化趋势,在不同压力、温度条件下测试不同酸化时间下的渗透率,分析得出煤体酸化后渗透率随酸化时间、压力和温度变化的规律。结果表明:13#烟煤、2#贫瘦煤的渗透率优于3#无烟煤,即中低阶煤的酸化效果比高阶煤好;围压对于渗透率的影响较为明显,随着围压的增加,渗透率呈现出减小的趋势;不同煤样在温度增加的前期阶段,随着温度的升高,渗透率呈现出加速增大的态势;在酸化的中间阶段,渗透率逐渐下降;在温度增加的后期阶段,渗透率随温度的升高虽还有所降低,但变化趋势不再特别明显,逐渐进入平稳阶段。
    Abstract: Through the permeability test of three different coal samples before and after acidification, the change trend of permeability of each coal sample is analyzed, and then the permeability under different pressures and temperature conditions is tested under different acidification time, and the laws of permeability changing with acidification time, pressure and temperature are obtained. The results show that the permeability of 13# bituminous coal and 2# lean coal is better than that of 3# anthracite, that is, the acidification effect of medium and low rank coal is better than that of high rank coal; the influence of confining pressure on permeability is more obvious, with the increase of confining pressure, the permeability shows a decreasing trend; in the early stage of temperature increase, with the increase of temperature, the permeability of different coal samples decreases. In the intermediate stage of acidification, the permeability decreases gradually; in the later stage of temperature increase, the permeability decreases with the increase of temperature, but the change trend is no longer particularly obvious, and gradually enters a stable stage.
  • [1] 刘炎杰.低渗透煤储层酸化改造实验研究[D].焦作:河南理工大学,2016.
    [2] 彭春洋,陈健,原晓珠,等.煤层气储层渗透性影响因素分析[J].煤,2011,20(5):38-41.
    [3] 张迎新,杨杰,王鹏飞,等.酸化工艺的煤层增透新技术[J].黑龙江科技大学学报,2014,24(2):177-181.
    [4] 贺玉龙,杨立中.温度和有效应力对砂岩渗透率的影响机理研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(12):2420-2427.
    [5] 郝振良.热应力作用下的有效应力对多孔介质渗透系数的影响[J].水动力学研究与进展,2003,18(6):792-796.
    [6] 彭博,李雄,饶孜,胡勇.新维矿区围岩瓦斯渗透率演化规律研究[J].中国煤炭,2019(5):59-63.
    [7] 李志强,鲜学福,隆晴明.不同温度应力条件下煤体渗透率实验研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2009,38(4):523-527.
    [8] 曹树刚,郭平,李勇,等.瓦斯压力对原煤渗透特性的影响[J].煤炭学报,2010,35(4):595-599.
    [9] 李明敏.褐煤热解渗透及其微观结构变化的研究[D].太原:太原理工大学,2012.
  • 期刊类型引用(2)

    1. 贾宗凯,张云龙,宋广明,苏伟伟. 水力压裂过程中单位注液量变化特征研究. 煤矿安全. 2023(10): 36-42 . 本站查看
    2. 肖知国,郝梅. 煤层酸化增透技术的研究现状及进展. 煤矿安全. 2023(10): 1-7 . 本站查看

    其他类型引用(8)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  105
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 10
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2019-12-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回