循环载荷作用下混凝土预制裂纹断裂特性试验研究
Fracture Characteristics Test of Precast Concrete Cracks Under Cyclic Loading
-
摘要: 以改造废弃巷道作为压缩空气储能系统,研究改造后巷道混凝土衬砌在循环拉应力作用下的稳定性。利用MTS-816岩石伺服试验系统对预制切口混凝土梁在循环载荷作用下的断裂特征进行了研究。首先,进行了单调加载条件下的三点弯曲试验,获得平均破坏载荷和平均断裂韧度。然后,进行了循环载荷试验,并计算断裂韧度。研究表明:当上限载荷比为0.8,循环载荷作用下的峰值COD(裂纹开口位移)变化可分为减速扩展阶段、等速扩展阶段和加速扩展阶段;当上限载荷比小于0.8,循环载荷作用下的峰值COD经过减速扩展阶段和等速扩展阶段的发展后,进入停滞扩展阶段,COD不再增加,裂纹不再扩展;混凝土断裂韧度的衰减与循环载荷的上限载荷有关,当上限载荷比从0.6提高至0.8时,断裂韧度衰率从0.8%增加至12.7%,断裂韧度衰减显著,反之则不超过0.8%,基本无衰减。Abstract: Taking on the retrofit abandoned laneway as compressed air energy storage system, we study the stability of its concrete lining under cyclic tensile stress. MTS-816 rock servo experimental system was introduced to cyclic three-point-bending test of notched concrete beam. Firstly, the average failure load and the average fracture toughness were obtained by the three point bending test under monotonic loading. Then, cyclic loading tests were carried out and fracture toughness was calculated. The test results show that: when the upper load ratio is 0.8, the peak COD(crack open displacement) curve can be divided into three stages, i.e. decelerated stage, stable stage and accumulation stage; when upper load ratio is below 0.8, the peak COD curve will get into stagnation stage after stable stage, COD no longer increases, crack no longer expands; the attenuation of fracture toughness of concrete is related to the upper limit of cyclic load. When the upper limit load ratio increases from 0.6 to 0.8, the fracture toughness decline rate increases from 0.8% to 12.7%, and the fracture toughness decreases significantly; otherwise, it does not exceed 0.8%, and there is basically no attenuation.
-
-
[1] CHEN H, CONG T N, YANG W, et al. Progress in electrical energy storage system: A critical review[J]. Progress in Natural Science, 2009, 19(3): 291-312. [2] Armaroli N, Balzani V. Towards an electricity-powered world[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(9): 3193-3222. [3] Lutyński M. An overview of potential benefits and limitations of Compressed Air Energy Storage in abandoned coal mines[C]∥IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing Ltd, 2017, 268(1): 1203-1209. [4] 赵艳华,魏鹏,高洪波.混凝土双参数断裂模型和尺寸效应模型R阻力曲线比较[J].大连理工大学学报,2015(4):387-392. [5] 王碗琴,强晟,郭晓娜,等.基于三维固定裂缝模型的混凝土开裂数值模拟[J].中国农村水利水电,2017(2):130-134. [6] 张君,王林,孙明,等.粗细骨料比例和水泥石强度对混凝土断裂参数的影响[J].工程力学,2004,21(1):136-142. [7] WILLIAM F JR, TOHAN E. Plane Strain Crack Toughness Testing of High-Strength Metallic Materials[M]. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1966. [8] 陈篪.三点弯曲断裂韧度试样的应力强度因子K_I[J].力学学报, 1974, 10(3):121-124. [9] Tada H, Paris P C, Irwin G R. The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook[M]. London: Professional Engineering Publishing, 2000. [10] 魏炯,朱万成,李如飞,等.岩石抗拉强度和断裂韧度的三点弯曲试验研究[J].水利与建筑工程学报,2016,14(3):128-132. [11] 葛修润,蒋宇,卢允德,等.周期载荷作用下岩石疲劳变形特性试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003, 22(10):1581-1585. [12] 李连崇,徐涛,唐春安,等.单轴压缩下岩石蠕变失稳破坏过程数值模拟[J].岩土力学,2007,28(9):1978-1982. -
期刊类型引用(6)
1. 赵兵朝,陈迪,陈攀,王京滨,冯杰. 基于C#语言与ArcGIS Engine的开采沉陷预计系统开发. 煤矿安全. 2024(08): 184-190 . 本站查看
2. 赵阳,陈俊凝,韦启蒙. 浅埋煤层采动地表移动变形规律及电塔塔基稳定性研究. 矿业研究与开发. 2023(02): 121-127 . 百度学术
3. 王元贵. 浅埋煤层群开采覆岩结构破断特征与地表变形规律研究. 山西煤炭. 2023(01): 123-128 . 百度学术
4. 赵兵朝,马云祥,王海龙,侯恩科,王京滨,韦启蒙. 双煤层开采地表下沉影响因素分析. 矿业研究与开发. 2022(07): 120-124 . 百度学术
5. 甄泽,张杰. 薄基岩工作面开采覆岩运移规律. 陕西煤炭. 2020(04): 49-52 . 百度学术
6. 刘东海,邓念东,姚婷. 潞安矿区煤炭开采沉陷主要控制因素分析. 矿业安全与环保. 2020(05): 103-107 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 76
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 9