• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

上覆遗留煤柱区冲击地压综合防控技术

孙刘伟, 秦子晗, 韩凉

孙刘伟, 秦子晗, 韩凉. 上覆遗留煤柱区冲击地压综合防控技术[J]. 煤矿安全, 2019, 50(7): 201-204.
引用本文: 孙刘伟, 秦子晗, 韩凉. 上覆遗留煤柱区冲击地压综合防控技术[J]. 煤矿安全, 2019, 50(7): 201-204.
SUN Liuwei, QIN Zihan, HAN Liang. Comprehensive Prevention Technology of Rock Burst in Overlying Retained Coal Pillar Area[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(7): 201-204.
Citation: SUN Liuwei, QIN Zihan, HAN Liang. Comprehensive Prevention Technology of Rock Burst in Overlying Retained Coal Pillar Area[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(7): 201-204.

上覆遗留煤柱区冲击地压综合防控技术

Comprehensive Prevention Technology of Rock Burst in Overlying Retained Coal Pillar Area

  • 摘要: 为防止南山煤矿18#煤层北三段工作面穿越上覆遗留煤柱区时发生冲击地压灾害,基于应力来源和表现形式,分析了冲击地压致灾力源因素,制定了静载荷卸压降载-动载荷减震消能的分源防控措施。实践表明,近距离遗留煤柱区动、静力源相互叠加,冲击危险性高,基于冲击力源分源防治思想,采用综放开采、爆破卸压降低巷道围岩静载荷水平,顶板爆破预裂、煤柱水力压裂降低动载荷扰动,巷道补强支护增强围岩抗冲能力,保证了巷道围岩处于低应力,微震能量以低能级、多频次形式释放,降低冲击显现程度,有效避免了遗留煤柱区冲击地压的发生。
    Abstract: To prevent the rock burst disaster when the northern 3# section of No. 18 coal seam crossed the overlying retained pillar area in Nanshan Coal Mine, based on the stress source and manifestation of stress, the factors causing the rock burst disaster were analyzed, the prevention measures including static partial pressure relief and dynamic load shock absorption and energy dissipation were formulated. Practice showed that the dynamic and static force superposed in the overlying retained pillar area, and the impact risk was high. Based on the thought of separate source prevention, the static load level of the surrounding rock of the roadway was reduced by fully mechanized caving mining and blasting pressure relief, the dynamic load disturbance was reduced by roof blasting pre-splitting and coal pillar hydraulic fracturing, and support reinforcement of full roadway section was designed to improve the anti-outburst ability, which ensured that the surrounding rock of the roadway was in low stress, and the micro-seismic energy was released in the form of low energy level and multi-frequency. It effectively avoided the occurrence of rock burst.
  • [1] 姜福兴,王玉宵,李明,等.上保护层煤柱引发被保护层冲击机理研究[J].岩土工程学报,2017,39(9):1689-1695.
    [2] 李静,何江,巩思园,等.上覆遗留煤柱作用下冲击矿压预测预警案例研究[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(S2):305-310.
    [3] 刘金海,魏尊义,魏振全,等.深井煤柱区冲击地压危险性分析与防治技术[J].煤炭科学技术,2014,42(12):41-44.
    [4] 许斌,于凤启,袁安营,等.上边界煤柱对下采场应力分布规律影响数值模拟[J].煤矿安全,2013,44(9):77-80.
    [5] 武泉林,陈万东,王普.上覆煤柱影响区应力状态及冲击地压防治[J].煤矿安全,2015,46(5):190-192.
    [6] 吴向前.保护层的降压减震吸能效应及其应用研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2012:15-16.
    [7] 齐庆新,李晓璐,赵善坤.煤矿冲击地压应力控制理论与实践[J].煤炭科学技术,2013,41(6):1-5.
    [8] 窦林名, 白金正, 李许伟, 等.基于动静载迭加原理的冲击矿压灾害防治技术研究[J].煤炭科学技术, 2018,46(10):1-8.
    [9] 潘俊锋.煤矿冲击地压启动理论及其成套技术体系研究[J].煤炭学报,2019,44(1):173-182.
    [10] 鞠文君.冲击矿压巷道锚杆支护原理分析[J].煤矿开采,2009,14(3):59-61.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  115
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2019-07-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回