煤矿安全管理执行力影响因素研究
Research on Influence Factors of Coal Mine Safety Management Execution
-
摘要: 为确定煤矿安全管理执行力影响因素及影响程度，提升煤矿安全管理执行力，采用文献查阅法、专家访谈法、归纳法确定煤矿安全管理执行力影响因素，在此基础上构建煤矿安全管理执行力影响因素路径关系模型并提出研究假设，最后用SPSS和AMOS进行分析实证。研究表明：组织结构、安全监督机制、安全战略目标、激励机制、安全岗位职责、安全管理技术、安全文化与管理人员执行能力之间的标准化路径系数为0.744、0.687、0.802、0.745、0.863、0.811、0.702，影响显著；组织结构、安全监督机制、安全战略目标、安全管理制度、激励机制、安全管理技术、安全文化与煤矿基层人员执行能力之间的标准化路径系数为0.721、0.750、0.692、0.675、0.763、0.849、0.683，影响显著；管理人员执行能力与基层人员执行能力之间的标准化路径系数为0.804，管理人员执行能力、基层人员执行能力与安全管理执行力之间的标准化路径系数为0.693、0.711，影响显著。Abstract: In order to determine the influence factors and influence degree of coal mine safety management execution and improve coal mine safety management execution, the methods of literature review, expert interview method, induction method are used to determine the influence factors of coal mine safety management execution. On this basis, we construct a path relationship model for the influence factors of coal mine safety management execution and put forward research hypotheses. Finally, we use SPSS and AMOS for analysis and demonstration. The research shows that the standardized path coefficients between organizational structure, safety supervision mechanism, safety strategic objectives, incentive mechanism, safety post responsibility, safety management technology, safety culture and execution of managers are 0.744, 0.687, 0.802, 0.745, 0.863, 0.811, 0.702, and the effects are significant; the standardized path coefficients between organizational structure, safety supervision mechanism, safety strategic objectives, safety management system, incentive mechanism, safety management technology, safety culture and execution of grass-roots personnel are 0.721, 0.750, 0.692, 0.675, 0.763, 0.849, 0.683, and the effects are significant; the standardized path coefficients between execution of managers, execution of grass-roots personnel and safety management execution are 0.693, 0.711, and the effects are significant.
-
-
[1] 韩素文.刍议煤矿企业安全管理执行力的提升[J].企业导报,2012,13(11):63-64. [2] 马文章,步磊,杨芳,等.基于执行力的煤矿安全文化的构建和推进[J].中国煤炭,2010,36(9):115-116. [3] 郎忠勤.执行力在煤矿管理中的分析[J].机械管理开发,2014,29(3):96-97. [4] Guotong Qiao, Yanna Zhu, Gang He. Evaluation of coal miners’ safety behavior based on AHP-GRAP and MATLAB[J]. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 2016, 16(1): 49-55. [5] 谭章禄,宋庆正.基于扎根理论的煤矿安全事故致因分析[J].煤矿安全,2017,48(9):238-240. [6] Zygmunt Korban. Quality assessment of occupational health and safety management at the level of business units making up the organizational structure of a coal mine: a case study[J]. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2015, 21(3): 373. [7] 王存飞,范文胜.新常态下矿井安全管理措施[J].煤矿安全,2017,48(1):109-112. [8] Cristian Costa, Lucian Lupu, Eduard Edelhauser. Safety Improvement Solutions In Coal Mines Using GIS[J]. ACTA Universitatis Cibiniensis, 2015, 66(1): 29-34. [9] Lianjiang Wei, Jiankun Hu, Xinrong Luo, et al. Study and analyze the development of China coal mine safety management[J]. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 2017, 11(1): 80-90. [10] Tiezhong Liu, Ziwei Wang, Wei Li, et al. Utility optimization strategy of safety management capability of coal mine A case study of JCIA[J]. Safety Science, 2012, 50(4): 684-688. [11] 张翼.煤矿安全质量标准化管理系统[J].煤矿安全, 2017,48(6):234-237. [12] Jianjun Zhu, Mingxing Li, He Yee. Performance Evaluation Research on Safety Management Capability of Coal Mine Enterprises based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, 2013(4): 866. [13] 李少军,刘斌.提升安全执行力促进煤矿安全发展[J].煤矿现代化,2008,17(1):6. [14] 林向阳.神华胜利露天煤矿安全管理执行力建设分析[J].露天采矿技术,2016(10):90-92. [15] Xueqiu He, Li Song. Status and future tasks of coal mining safety in China[J]. Safety Science, 2012, 50(4): 894-898.
计量
- 文章访问数: 150
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0
下载:
