• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

基于改进突变级数法的瓦斯爆炸危险性评价

罗振敏, 李逵, 安亚飞, 李海涛, 傅文

罗振敏, 李逵, 安亚飞, 李海涛, 傅文. 基于改进突变级数法的瓦斯爆炸危险性评价[J]. 煤矿安全, 2018, 49(6): 246-250.
引用本文: 罗振敏, 李逵, 安亚飞, 李海涛, 傅文. 基于改进突变级数法的瓦斯爆炸危险性评价[J]. 煤矿安全, 2018, 49(6): 246-250.
LUO Zhenmin, LI Kui, AN Yafei, LI Haitao, FU Wen. Risk Assessment of Gas Explosion Based on Improved Catastrophe Progression Method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(6): 246-250.
Citation: LUO Zhenmin, LI Kui, AN Yafei, LI Haitao, FU Wen. Risk Assessment of Gas Explosion Based on Improved Catastrophe Progression Method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2018, 49(6): 246-250.

基于改进突变级数法的瓦斯爆炸危险性评价

Risk Assessment of Gas Explosion Based on Improved Catastrophe Progression Method

  • 摘要: 为对复杂的瓦斯爆炸指标体系进行瓦斯爆炸危险性的评价,提出了基于突变级数理论的瓦斯爆炸危险性评价模型。基于突变级数法和合主成分分析法从“物-机-人-管理”4个方面构建矿井瓦斯爆炸危险性评价指标结构,对影响瓦斯爆炸的28个因素进行多层次分解,建立满足突变级数法要求的评价模型,以4个煤矿采掘工作面为例,确定各层指标的相对重要性,对各层指标数据进行无量纲化和归一化处理,确定突变级数值,并将计算结果与灰色-层次分析法评价进行比较,结果表明,2种模型评价结果总体保持一致,验证了所提方法的有效性和可靠性,为瓦斯爆炸危险性评价提供了一种新方法。
    Abstract: To evaluate the risk of gas explosion in the complex gas explosion index system, risk evaluation model of gas explosion based on catastrophe progression theory was proposed. We constructed assessment index system based on the principal component analysis and catastrophe progression to form “object-machine-human-management” four aspects to carry out multi-level decomposition from twenty-eight factors affecting gas explosion, and the evaluation model satisfying the requirements of catastrophe progression method was established; 4 coal mining faces were taken as the examples to determine the relative importance of each layer indicator; after the nondimensionalization and normalization processing of the influencing factors, catastrophe progression value was determined, and the results were compared with gray analytical hierarchy process. The study shows that the result of the two models was consistent, and the validity and reliability of the proposed method are verified.
  • [1] 徐尚仲,朱传杰,高玉成,等.煤矿瓦斯爆炸重大危险源辨识与风险评价[J].煤矿安全,2007,38(2):11.
    [2] 张爱然,罗新荣.基于模糊神经网络的瓦斯爆炸危险性评价模型[J].黑龙江科技大学学报,2008,18(1):54-57.
    [3] 张勇,王超,魏明尧,等.基于事故树分析的煤矿掘进面瓦斯爆炸危险评价研究[J].煤炭技术,2010,29(11):70-73.
    [4] 余帅雷.基于熵权模糊综合的煤矿瓦斯爆炸危险性评价[J].现代矿业,2011,27(8):38-40.
    [5] 施式亮,李润求.煤矿瓦斯爆炸事故演化危险性评价的AHP-GT模型及应用[J].煤炭学报,2010,35(7):1137-1141.
    [6] 施式亮.矿井安全非线性动力学评价[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2001.
    [7] 张旺,冯涛,武剑,等.基于突变级数法的煤矿瓦斯爆炸危险性评价[J].矿业工程研究,2016(1):41-45.
    [8] 李润求,施式亮,彭新.煤矿瓦斯爆炸事故演化的突变模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(3):22-27.
    [9] 秦毅,杨胜强,马旭东.基于主成分分析法的煤与瓦斯突出危险性评价[J].煤矿安全,2012,43(9):215.
    [10] 徐雅静,汪远征.主成分分析应用方法的改进[J].数学的实践与认识,2006,36(6):68-75.
    [11] 田水承,李华.基于神经网络的掘进面瓦斯爆炸危险源安全评价[J].煤田地质与勘探,2005,33(3):19.
    [12] 严敏.综放面瓦斯爆炸危险性非线性分析模型及应用[D].西安:西安科技大学,2009.
    [13] 陈晓红,彭佳,吴小瑾.基于突变级数法的中小企业成长性评价模型研究[J].财经研究,2004,30(11):5-15.
    [14] 宋谦,王静.我国科技服务业发展水平评价—基于改进突变级数法[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(6):51.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  152
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2018-06-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回