• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

特厚煤层卸压措施有效性实测分析

杜建鹏, 魏全德, 杨光宇, 曲效成

杜建鹏, 魏全德, 杨光宇, 曲效成. 特厚煤层卸压措施有效性实测分析[J]. 煤矿安全, 2017, 48(9): 186-189.
引用本文: 杜建鹏, 魏全德, 杨光宇, 曲效成. 特厚煤层卸压措施有效性实测分析[J]. 煤矿安全, 2017, 48(9): 186-189.
DU Jianpeng, WEI Quande, YANG Guangyu, QU Xiaocheng. Effectiveness Measured Analysis of Pressure Unloading Measures for Extra Thick Coal Seam[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(9): 186-189.
Citation: DU Jianpeng, WEI Quande, YANG Guangyu, QU Xiaocheng. Effectiveness Measured Analysis of Pressure Unloading Measures for Extra Thick Coal Seam[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2017, 48(9): 186-189.

特厚煤层卸压措施有效性实测分析

Effectiveness Measured Analysis of Pressure Unloading Measures for Extra Thick Coal Seam

  • 摘要: 针对强冲击特厚煤层卸压措施难以选择的工程问题,通过理论研究与现场实测,对大直径卸压钻孔、煤层深孔卸压爆破、煤层注水3种卸压措施,进行了单卸压措施时效性对比实测。现场实测分析结果表明:大直径卸压钻孔卸压效果见效慢,但时效性较强,应作为常规的卸压措施;煤层深孔卸压爆破卸压效果见效快,但时效性较差,短时间内存在应力恢复现象,应作为临时解危措施;煤层注水卸压效果适中,同时具有较强的时效性,但存在应力转移和巷道大变形的情况,对于巷道断面较小的冲击地压工作面不应作为常规防冲措施,可以作为防尘措施实施。
    Abstract: For ultra-thick coal seams with strong rock burst tendency, it is difficult to select proper unloading measures. This investigation compared three unloading methods, such as large diameter unloading borehole method, deep-hole unloading method, and water-injecting method by theoretical study and field monitoring, and some conclusions are drawn. The large diameter unloading borehole method with good timeliness takes slow effect and therefore it can be viewed as a regular unloading method. The deep-hole unloading method with poor timeliness takes a fast effect and hence the stress will recover in a short time. This method can be selected as a temporary unloading method. The water-injecting method with good timeliness takes moderate effect; however, the stress will transfer and roadway may deform heavily. This method can be taken as dust-prevention not rock burst prevention measure for longwall panels with small roadway sections.
  • [1] 姜福兴,魏全德,姚顺利,等.冲击地压防治关键理论与技术分析[J].煤炭科学技术,2013,41(6):6-9.
    [2] 宋振骐,卢国志,彭林军,等.煤矿冲击地压事故预测控制及其动力信息系统[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2006,25(4):1-5.
    [3] 潘立友,孙刘伟,范宗乾.深部矿井构造区厚煤层冲击地压机理与应用[J].煤炭科学技术,2013,41(9):126.
    [4] 潘俊锋,连国明,齐庆新,等.冲击危险性厚煤层综放开采冲击地压发生机理[J].煤炭科学技术,2007,35(6):87-90,94.
    [5] 姜福兴,魏全德,王存文,等.巨厚砾岩与逆冲断层控制型特厚煤层冲击地压机理分析[J].煤炭学报,2014,39(7):1191-1196.
    [6] 姜福兴,王平,冯增强,等.复合型厚煤层“震-冲”型动力灾害机理、预测与控制[J].煤炭学报,2009,34(2):1605-1609.
    [7] 刘宏军.双侧采空孤岛工作面钻孔卸压技术及效果研究[J].煤炭工程,2016,48(4): 58 -61.
    [8] 李金奎,熊振华,刘东生,等.钻孔卸压防治巷道冲击地压的数值模拟[J].西安科技大学学报,2009,29(4):424-426.
    [9] 周林生,樊克恭,刘军,等.冲击地压工作面爆破卸压效果的数值模拟[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,24(4):77-80.
    [10] 魏明尧,王恩元,刘晓斐,等.深部煤层卸压爆破防治冲击地压效果的数值模拟研究[J].岩土力学,2011,32(8):2539-2543.
    [11] 郝其林.复合型灾害矿井特厚煤层工作面注水效果分析[J].煤矿安全,2012,43(10):174-177.
    [12] 曲效成,姜福兴,于正兴,等.基于当量钻屑法的冲击地压监测预警技术研究及应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(11):2346-2351.
    [13] 刘金海,姜福兴,孙广京,等.强排煤粉防治冲击地压的机制与应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(4):747-754.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  217
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2017-09-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回