特厚煤层卸压措施有效性实测分析

    Effectiveness Measured Analysis of Pressure Unloading Measures for Extra Thick Coal Seam

    • 摘要: 针对强冲击特厚煤层卸压措施难以选择的工程问题,通过理论研究与现场实测,对大直径卸压钻孔、煤层深孔卸压爆破、煤层注水3种卸压措施,进行了单卸压措施时效性对比实测。现场实测分析结果表明:大直径卸压钻孔卸压效果见效慢,但时效性较强,应作为常规的卸压措施;煤层深孔卸压爆破卸压效果见效快,但时效性较差,短时间内存在应力恢复现象,应作为临时解危措施;煤层注水卸压效果适中,同时具有较强的时效性,但存在应力转移和巷道大变形的情况,对于巷道断面较小的冲击地压工作面不应作为常规防冲措施,可以作为防尘措施实施。

       

      Abstract: For ultra-thick coal seams with strong rock burst tendency, it is difficult to select proper unloading measures. This investigation compared three unloading methods, such as large diameter unloading borehole method, deep-hole unloading method, and water-injecting method by theoretical study and field monitoring, and some conclusions are drawn. The large diameter unloading borehole method with good timeliness takes slow effect and therefore it can be viewed as a regular unloading method. The deep-hole unloading method with poor timeliness takes a fast effect and hence the stress will recover in a short time. This method can be selected as a temporary unloading method. The water-injecting method with good timeliness takes moderate effect; however, the stress will transfer and roadway may deform heavily. This method can be taken as dust-prevention not rock burst prevention measure for longwall panels with small roadway sections.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回