矿井热动力灾害救援安全性评价指标体系
Evaluation Index System for Rescue Safety of Mine Thermodynamic Disasters
-
摘要: 在现代事故致因理论的基础上，采用“人-机-环-管理”系统分析法，结合矿井热动力灾害救援的特点，初步构建了具有14大类50个影响因素的矿井热动力灾害救援安全性评价指标体系；采用Delphi法和AHP法对初步提出的评价指标进行了优化，得到了具有6个一级指标、20个二级指标的评价指标体系结构；提出了评价指标预处理、量化和指标权重赋值方法，对优选后的矿井热动力灾害评价指标进行了处理，得到了矿井热动力灾害救援安全性评价指标体系。Abstract: Based on the modern accident causation theory, combining with rescue characteristics of mine thermodynamic disasters, the preliminary evaluation index system for the safety degree of mine thermodynamic disasters rescue was established, which through adopting the analysis method of “human - machine - environment - management” system. This evaluation index system consists of 14 categories and 50 influence factors. After that, the optimized evaluation index system with 6 first level indicators and 20 secondary level indicators were obtained through using the method of Delphi and AHP. Finally, based on the proposed method of evaluation index pretreatment, quantification and index weight assignment, the optimized evaluation indexes are processed. The safety evaluation index system of mine thermodynamic disaster rescue was obtained.
-
-
[1] 王海燕,王兵建.矿井热动力灾害学[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2010. [2] 文虎,郭军,金永飞,等.我国矿井热动力灾害评价研究进展及趋势[J].煤矿安全,2016,47(3):172-178. [3] 文虎.煤矿事故应急救援[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2014. [4] 岳宁芳.煤矿重大灾害事故应急能力评估指标体系的构建[J].煤炭技术,2009,28(2):3-5. [5] 施式亮.矿井安全非线性动力学评价模型及其应用研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2000. [6] 曾强.煤矿安全评价指标体系确定原则及其应用分析[J].矿业安全与环保,2005,32(6):79-81. [7] 施式亮,王海桥.矿井安全非线性动力学[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2001. [8] 郭军.矿井热动力灾害救援安全性评价与动态预测[D].西安:西安科技大学,2016. [9] 裴学军.专家评分评价法及应用[J].哈尔滨铁道科技,2000(1):32. [10] T L Saaty.The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]. New York: Mcgraw-Hill, 1980. [11] 徐星,孙文标.层次分析法在煤矿突水风险评价中的应用[J].煤炭技术,2016,35(6):143-144. [12] 郝长胜,盛军坤,樊雪敏,等.基于模糊层次分析法的矿山安全综合评价模型[J].煤炭技术,2016,35(2):234-236. [13] 屈娟,田水承,从常奎,等.基于AHP的煤矿瓦斯爆炸事故危险性分析与评价[J].矿业安全与环保,2008,35(4):77-79. -
期刊类型引用(1)
1. 王大顺. 巷道围岩最大主偏应力及塑性区分布形态演化规律研究. 煤矿安全. 2023(08): 118-127 . 
本站查看
其他类型引用(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 280
- HTML全文浏览量: 1
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 4
下载:
