• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

基于群决策理论的煤矿安全事故人因分析结果集结方法

乔楠, 陈兆波, 阴东玲, 曾建潮, 李亨英, 李忠卫

乔楠, 陈兆波, 阴东玲, 曾建潮, 李亨英, 李忠卫. 基于群决策理论的煤矿安全事故人因分析结果集结方法[J]. 煤矿安全, 2016, 47(10): 235-237,241.
引用本文: 乔楠, 陈兆波, 阴东玲, 曾建潮, 李亨英, 李忠卫. 基于群决策理论的煤矿安全事故人因分析结果集结方法[J]. 煤矿安全, 2016, 47(10): 235-237,241.
QIAO Nan, CHEN Zhaobo, YIN Dongling, ZENG Jianchao, LI Hengying, LI Zhongwei. Aggregated Method of Human Factor Analysis Results for Coal Mine Accidents Based on Group Decision-making Theory[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(10): 235-237,241.
Citation: QIAO Nan, CHEN Zhaobo, YIN Dongling, ZENG Jianchao, LI Hengying, LI Zhongwei. Aggregated Method of Human Factor Analysis Results for Coal Mine Accidents Based on Group Decision-making Theory[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(10): 235-237,241.

基于群决策理论的煤矿安全事故人因分析结果集结方法

Aggregated Method of Human Factor Analysis Results for Coal Mine Accidents Based on Group Decision-making Theory

  • 摘要: 为了解决多位分析人员基于HFACS模型对同一份煤矿安全事故报告进行人因分析时分析结果不一致的问题,基于群决策理论构建了煤矿安全事故人因分析结果的集结方法。在判定人因分析结果群体一致性的基础上,根据分析结果的差异程度确定分析人员权重,进而通过分析结果加权集结得到煤矿安全事故中各项人因因素群体一致性分析结果,从而提高煤矿安全事故人因分析结果的客观性。进一步,通过实例验证了设计的煤矿安全事故人因分析结果集结方法的有效性。
    Abstract: In order to solve the inconsistency problem of analysis results which are obtained from different analysts by using human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) to analyze the same mining accident, aggregated method for the analysis results is proposed based on group decision-making theory. Based on the consistency analysis of group human factor analysis results, analysts' weights are determined by difference of these results. And then, every human factor's group consistency analysis result in a mining accident is obtained by weighting aggregation to improve the objectivity of the human factor analysis results. Furthermore, an example is used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.
  • [1] 陈红,祈慧,宋学锋,等.煤矿重大事故中管理失误行为影响因素结构模型[J].煤炭学报,2006,31(5):689-696.
    [2] D A Wiegmann, S A Shappell. A human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents using the human factors analysis and classification system [R]. The Report of Office of Aviation Medicine Federal Aviation Administration, 2001: 1-18.
    [3] J T Reason. Managing the risks of organizational accidents [M]. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 1997.
    [4] 张正勋.HFACS在民航训练飞行人为差错分析的应用[D].成都:电子科技大学,2010.
    [5] 王盼盼,邓小鹏.基于人的因素分析和分类系统的建筑施工事故研究[J].工程管理学报.2010(2):60.
    [6] 陈兆波,刘媛媛,曾建潮,等.煤矿安全事故人因分析结果的一致性研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2014,24(2):145-150.
    [7] 达庆利,刘新旺.区间数线性规划及其满意解[J].系统工程理论与实践,1999,19(4):3-7.
    [8] 陈侠,樊治平,陈岩.一种基于区间数决策矩阵的专家群体判断一致性分析方法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2007,28(10):1509-1503.
    [9] 徐泽水.模糊互补判断矩阵的相容性及一致性研究[J].解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版),2002,3(2):94-96.
    [10] 刘万里.关于AHP中逆判问题的研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001,21(4):133-136.
    [11] 陈侠,樊治平.基于互补判断矩阵的专家群体判断一致性分析[J].东北大学学报,2005,6(6):595-598.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  192
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2016-10-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回