• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

蒙陕接壤区深埋型煤层顶板水文地质及水文地球化学特征

杨建

杨建. 蒙陕接壤区深埋型煤层顶板水文地质及水文地球化学特征[J]. 煤矿安全, 2016, 47(10): 176-179,183.
引用本文: 杨建. 蒙陕接壤区深埋型煤层顶板水文地质及水文地球化学特征[J]. 煤矿安全, 2016, 47(10): 176-179,183.
YANG Jian. Hydrogeological and Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of Deep Buried Coal Seam Roof in Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia Contiguous Area[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(10): 176-179,183.
Citation: YANG Jian. Hydrogeological and Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of Deep Buried Coal Seam Roof in Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia Contiguous Area[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016, 47(10): 176-179,183.

蒙陕接壤区深埋型煤层顶板水文地质及水文地球化学特征

Hydrogeological and Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of Deep Buried Coal Seam Roof in Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia Contiguous Area

  • 摘要: 为了弄清蒙陕接壤区深埋型煤层顶板水文地质及水文地球化学特征,利用水文地球化学数据开展了综合研究,结果表明:白垩系志丹群与第四系之间水力联系密切,矿化度较低,属于HCO3-Ca型水,与志丹群底板标高没有相关性。安定组可有效地阻隔上部含水层水对直罗组的补给;大部分矿井主采煤层到安定组顶板距离较大(>250 m),导水断裂带不会波及志丹群含水。主采煤层顶板含水层水中矿化度与地层标高呈负相关关系,大部分水样属于深部滞留型的SO4-Na型水;但榆横北区的几个矿,普遍属于SO4-Na·Ca型水,Cl/HCO3值也偏小,表明榆横北区上下含水层联系相对较好。
    Abstract: In order to make clear the hydrogeological and hydrogeochemical characteristics of deep buried coal seam roof in Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia contiguous area, hydrogeochemical data are used to carry out a comprehensive research. The results showed that Cretaceous Zhidan group has close hydraulic connection with Quaternary aquifer and the water chemical characteristic is HCO3-Ca type water with low degree of mineralization. The hydrogeochemical characteristics were not related with floor elevation of Zhidan group aquifer. Anding group can effectively cut off the upper aquifer water supply into Zhiluo formation aquifer and Yanan formation aquifer. The distance from main mining coal seam to Anding formation roof was larger (>250 m), and the height of diversion fissure zone could not reach Zhidan group aquifer. There was a negative correlation between total dissolved solids (TDS) and stratum elevation in the roof aquifer of main mining coal seam. The water chemical characteristic was SO4-Na type water in most coal mines. But the water chemical characteristic was SO4-Na·Ca type water in Yubei Mining Area, and the value of Cl/HCO3 was small. There was better hydraulic connection in Yubei Mining Area than other areas.
  • [1] 刘池洋, 赵红格, 桂小军, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地演化-改造的时空坐标及其成藏(矿)响应[J].地质学报,2006,80(5): 617-638.
    [2] 黄文辉, 敖卫华, 翁成敏, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪煤的煤岩特征及成因分析[J].现代地质, 2010, 24(6):1186-1197.
    [3] 王德潜, 刘祖植, 尹立河. 鄂尔多斯盆地水文地质特征及地下水系统分析[J].第四纪研究,2005,25(1):6-14.
    [4] 林学钰,廖资生,赵勇胜, 等.现代水文地质学[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2005.
    [5] 侯光才.鄂尔多斯白垩系盆地地下水系统及其水循环模式研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2008.
    [6] 窦妍. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部白垩系地下水水文地球化学演化及循环规律研究[D].西安:长安大学,2010.
    [7] 王玮. 鄂尔多斯白垩系地下水盆地地下水资源可持续性研究[D].西安:长安大学, 2004.
    [8] 董维红.反向水文地球化学模拟技术在鄂尔多斯白垩系自流水盆地深层地下水14C年龄校正中的应用[D].长春:吉林大学,2005.
    [9] 董维红, 苏小四, 谢渊, 等. 鄂尔多斯白垩系盆地地下水水2岩反应的锶同位素证据[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2010,40(2):342-348.
    [10] 杨建, 黄选明. 利用三维荧光光谱判别煤矿区含水层水力联系[J].煤矿安全,2015,46(7):40-43.
    [11] 赵俊峰, 刘池洋, 赵建设, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗系直罗组沉积相及其演化[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,38(3): 480-486.
    [12] 李振宏, 董树文, 冯胜斌, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中-晚侏罗世构造事件的沉积响应[J].地球学报, 2015, 36(1): 22-30.
    [13] 吕文宏. 覆岩顶板导水裂隙带发育高度模拟与实测[J].西安科技大学学报, 2014,34(3): 309-313.
  • 期刊类型引用(0)

    其他类型引用(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 2
出版历程
  • 发布日期:  2016-10-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回