非导水陷落柱采动裂隙发育深度研究

Research on Development Depth of Mining Fracture in Non-flowing Water Collapse Column

摘要: 为了探索采动对构造内岩体的影响，以晋煤集团成庄煤矿为试验现场，通过对比正常煤层与含非导水陷落柱煤层的底板采动破坏情况，综合研究构造的采动裂隙发育规律。结果表明：正常煤层与含构造煤层底板采动破坏深度的理论、模拟与工程探测结果均在19 m和31 m附近，结果吻合且可靠，即非导水陷落柱的采动裂隙发育深度约为正常煤层的1.7倍。
- 煤层底板 /
- 非导水陷落柱 /
- 裂隙发育深度 /
- 应力-应变试验 /
- 突水
Abstract: In order to explore the influence of coal mining on rock mass within the structure, taking Chengzhuang Coal Mine of Jincheng Anthracite Mining Group as testing site, through the contrast analysis of floor destruction in normal coal seam and non-flowing water collapse column, we comprehensively research the laws of mining fractures within structure. The results show that the results of floor mining-induced damage depth for normal coal seam and tectonic coal seam from numerical simulation, theoretical calculation and engineering tests are 19 m and 31 m; the data matched each other very well. In other word, the mining-induced fracture depth of non-flowing water collapse column is 1.7 times of the normal coal seam.
- coal seam floor /
- non-flowing water collapse column /
- fracture development depth /
- stress-strain test /
- water inrush

[1]	王永红,沈文.中国煤矿水害预防及治理[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1996.
[2]	白海波，戎虎仁，刘树才，等.白云乌素煤矿奥陶系顶部碳酸岩层隔水性及应用研究[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2012,29(5):601-606.
[3]	焦阳,白海波，张勃阳，等.煤层开采对第四系松散含水层影响的研究[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2012,29(3):239-245.
[4]	焦阳,白海波.煤层底板含隐伏溶洞滞后突水机理[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(2):377-382.
[5]	李连崇,唐春安，左宇军，等.煤层底板下隐伏陷落柱的滞后突水机理[J].煤炭学报,2009,34(9):1212.
[6]	李连崇,唐春安，李根，等.含隐伏断层煤层底板损伤演化及滞后突水机理分析[J].岩土工程学报,2009,31(12):1838-1844.
[7]	刘树才.煤矿底板突水机理及破坏裂隙带演化动态探测技术[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2008.
[8]	李文军,焦阳，白海波，等.带压煤层开采底板裂隙发育深度综合研究[J].煤矿安全，2014,45（2）：38-40.
[9]	白海波，缪协兴.水资源保护性采煤的研究进展与面临的问题[J].采矿与安全工程学报，2009，26(3)：253-262.
[10]	白海波，茅献彪，唐军华，等.潞安矿区煤水共采技术研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报，2009，28(2)：395.
[11]	钱鸣高，许家林，缪协兴.煤矿绿色开采技术[J].中国矿业大学学报，2003，32(4)：343-347.