不同劈裂角度下煤岩抗拉强度理论计算与试验研究

    Theoretical Calculation and Experimental Research on Tensile Strength of Coal Rock Under Different Splitting Angles

    • 摘要: 煤岩割理系统发育,采用巴西劈裂试验测定煤岩抗拉强度时,由于加载方向和面、端割理所呈夹角不同,试验结果离散性较强,无法准确描述煤岩真实的抗拉强度。假设面、端割理相互垂直,基于平面应力弹性力学,推导了割理倾角与煤岩抗拉强度的关系,依此确定了巴西劈裂试验不同劈裂角度下的煤样破坏方式,通过试验对理论计算结果进行验证,两者趋势吻合较好。研究表明:由于煤岩内部割理的存在,煤样不仅会沿加载轴线发生劈裂破坏,当加载方向与割理呈一定角度时,煤样也可能沿着面割理或端割理发生剪切破坏,煤样沿面割理剪切破坏的强度小于沿端割理剪切破坏的强度,二者均小于沿加载轴线劈裂的煤岩真实抗拉强度。

       

      Abstract: The cleat system of coal developed well and the experimental results show a strong discreteness when Brazilian test is used for determining the tensile strength of coal, due to the different angles between loading directions with face cleat and butt cleat respectively, it reduces the accurate degree for describing the tensile strength. We supposed that the face cleat and butt cleat are perpendicular to each other, thereupon then the relation between tensile strength of coal and the angle of loading direction and face cleat is deduced and the coal sample failure modes of different splitting angles in Brazilian test are determined. Plenty of experiments are carried out for validating the calculated results and they are in good agreement. The results show that coal samples are not only have splitting failure along with the loading axis, but also have failure by shearing along the face cleat and butt cleat when the loading direction and cleat is on a certain angle due to the existence of cleat in coal. The shearing strength of coal samples along with face cleat is less than the butt cleat, and they are both less than the true tensile strength of splitting along with the loading axis.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回