CF3H和CO2抑制CH4爆炸实验研究

    Study on suppression of CH4 explosion by CF3H and CO2

    • 摘要: 为对比研究CF3H和CO2对CH4爆炸特性的抑制效果,使用20 L球型爆炸压力测试系统分别测量对比2种抑制剂对CH4在空气中爆炸极限范围的影响;研究了不同体积分数的2种抑制剂对CH4体积分数9.5%爆炸压力参数影响,分析了2种抑制剂针对CH4在空气中爆炸的爆炸三角形。结果表明:CF3H和CO2均能缩小CH4在空气中的爆炸极限范围,抑制CH4至失爆所需CF3H和CO2体积分数分别为12.5%和21.5%;对比抑制CH4体积分数9.5%的爆炸参数(反应峰值压力和升压速率),10%CF3H的抑爆能力是等量CO2的1.95倍和1.3倍,但是低于体积分数4%的CF3H单独使用时对CH4爆炸存在微弱的促进作用;2种抑制剂作用下的爆炸三角形显示CF3H抑制下的可爆区域面积小于CO2,安全区域内CF3H的窒息比是CO2的57%。

       

      Abstract: To compare the inhibitory effects of HFC-23 (CF3H) and CO2 on methane explosion characteristics, a 20 L spherical explosion pressure testing system was used to measure the effects of two inhibitors on the explosion limit range of CH4 in air. The effects of two inhibitors with different volume fractions on the explosion pressure parameters of 9.5% volume fraction CH4 were studied, and the explosion suppression triangles of the two inhibitors for CH4 explosion in air were analyzed. The results indicate that both CF3H and CO2 can reduce the explosion limit range of methane in air, and the required volume fractions of CF3H and CO2 to suppress CH4 detonation are 12.5% and 21.5%, respectively. Compared the explosion suppression parameters (peak reaction pressure and pressure rise rate) that inhibit CH4 by volume fraction CH4, the explosion suppression ability of 10% CF3H is 1.95 times and 1.3 times that of an equal amount of 9.5% CO2, but CF3H with volume fraction of 4% has a weak promotion effect on the explosion of CH4 when it used alone. The explosion suppression triangle of the two inhibitors shows that the explosive area under CF3H suppression is smaller than CO2, and the suffocation ratio of CF3H in the safe area is 57% of CO2.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回